ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1330

Effect of Guselkumab (TREMFYA®), a Selective IL-23p19 Inhibitor, on Axial-Related Endpoints in Patients with Active PsA: Results from a Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study Through 2 Years

Philip Mease1, Philip S Helliwell2, Dafna Gladman3, Denis Poddubnyy4, Xenofon Baraliakos5, Soumya Chakravarty6, Alexa Kollmeier7, Xie Xu8, Shihong Sheng8, Stephen Xu8, May Shawi9, Désirée van der Heijde10 and Atul Deodhar11, 1Swedish Medical Center/Providence St. Joseph Health and University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 2Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, 3Schroeder Arthritis Institute, Krembil Research Institute, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, 4Department of Rheumatology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany, 5Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet Herne, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Herne, Germany, 6Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC and Drexel University College of Medicine, Horsham, PA, 7Janssen Research & Development, LLC, La Jolla, CA, 8Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, PA, 9Janssen Immunology Global Commercial Strategy Organization, Toronto, ON, Canada, 10Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Meerssen, Netherlands, 11Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: Biologicals, clinical trial, Psoriatic arthritis, Spondylarthropathies, X-ray

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 8, 2021

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including PsA – Treatment Poster II: Psoriatic Arthritis I (1329–1363)

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Guselkumab (GUS), a selective IL-23p19 inhibitor, resulted in greater mean improvements in BASDAI scores vs placebo (PBO) at W24 among patients (pts) with active PsA and investigator-confirmed sacroiliitis in pooled post hoc analyses of data from two phase 3 trials, DISCOVER-1&2. Improvements in these symptoms of axial involvement were maintained through 1 year.1We aimed to further assess maintenance of GUS effect on symptoms of axial involvement among biologic-naïve PsA pts with investigator-confirmed sacroiliitis through 2 years of DISCOVER-2.

Methods: In this phase 3, double-blind, PBO-controlled study, 739 bio-naïve pts with active PsA (≥5 swollen joints, ≥5 tender joints, CRP ≥0.6mg/dL despite standard therapies) were randomized 1:1:1 and treated with GUS 100 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W; n=245), GUS 100 mg at W0, W4, then Q8W (n=248), or PBO (n=246), with PBOàGUS 100 mg Q4W at W24. Pts identified by the investigator as having axial symptoms and sacroiliitis (prior X-ray or MRI, or pelvic X-ray at screening) were evaluated. Efficacy was assessed by change in BASDAI, modified BASDAI (mBASDAI, excluding Q3 [peripheral joint pain]), and BASDAI Q2 (Spinal Pain) scores and proportions of pts achieving BASDAI 50 response, Spinal Pain score ≤2, and AS Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) responses through W100. Through W24, pts who met treatment failure criteria or had missing data were considered nonresponders or to have no change from baseline. After W24, missing data were imputed as nonresponse for binary endpoints or no change from baseline for continuous endpoints (nonresponder imputation [NRI]). Axial-related outcomes were also summarized by HLA-B27 status (+/-) among 149 pts with available data.

Results: 246 pts had sacroiliitis confirmed by the investigator. Baseline characteristics were similar across treatment groups (62% male; mean age 44.4 years); mean BASDAI scores ranged from 6.5-6.6. At W24, LSmean/mean changes in BASDAI (-2.4/-2.6) and ASDAS (-1.3/-1.5) scores were greater in GUS than PBO-treated pts. Mean changes from baseline were maintained through W100 in GUS-treated pts for BASDAI (-3.1), Spinal Pain (-3.1), mBASDAI (‑3.1), and ASDAS (‑1.7) scores. Similar response patterns were observed for BASDAI 50 response rates among GUS-treated pts (W24 38-40%; W100 49-54%). At W24, GUS-treated pts had higher response rates for achievement of ASDAS inactive disease, major improvement, and clinically important improvement vs. PBO; response rates (NRI) were maintained, or in some cases further increased, at 2 years. Consistent results were observed for achievement of ASDAS LDA and Spinal Pain score ≤2 (data not shown). GUS-related improvements in axial symptoms through W100 were generally consistent across pts who were HLA-B27+/- (data not shown).

Conclusion: In bio-naive pts with active PsA and investigator-confirmed sacroiliitis, GUS provided durable improvements in axial symptoms through W100, with substantial proportions of pts achieving and maintaining clinically meaningful improvements.

References:
1. Mease PJ. Lancet Rheumatol 2021; In press.

Table. Axial symptom assessments through W100 in PsA pts with investigator-confirmed sacroiliitis in DISCOVER_2 (NRI)

Figure. Proportion of PsA patients with investigator-confirmed sacroiliitis achieving BASDAI 50 response (A), and ASDAS clinically important improvement (decrease ≥1.1) (B), major improvement (decrease ≥2.0) (C), and inactive disease ( < 1.3) (D) through W100 (NRI)


Disclosures: P. Mease, AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Amgen, 2, 5, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 6, Galapagos, 2, 5, Celgene, 2, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, Genentech, 2, 5, 6, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, Gilead Sciences, 2, 5, 6, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, Sun Pharma, 2, 5, UCB Pharma, 2, 6, GSK, 2; P. Helliwell, Pfizer Inc, 1, Novartis, 6, Janssen, 1, 6, AbbVie, 6, Galapagos, 1, Eli Lilly, 1; D. Gladman, AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, Galapagos, 2, 5, Gilead, 2, 5, Janssen, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, UCB, 2, 5, Celgene, 2, 5, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, 5; D. Poddubnyy, AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Eli Lilly and Company, 2, 5, 6, MSD, 2, 5, 6, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, UCB, 2, 6, BMS, 2, 6, Roche, 2, 6; X. Baraliakos, AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Chugai, 2, 5, 6, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, UCB, 2, 5, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, 6, Celegene, 2, 5, 6, Merck, 2, 6, Werfen, 2; S. Chakravarty, Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC (a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson), 3, 11; A. Kollmeier, Janssen Research & Development, LLC (a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson), 3, 11; X. Xu, Janssen Research & Development, LLC (a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson), 3, 11; S. Sheng, Janssen Research & Development, LLC (a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson), 3, 11; S. Xu, Janssen Research & Development, LLC (a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson), 3, 11; M. Shawi, Janssen Global Services, LLC (a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson), 3, 11; D. van der Heijde, AbbVie, 2, Amgen, 2, Astellas, 2, AstraZeneca, 2, Bayer, 2, BMS, 2, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, Celgene, 2, Cyxone, 2, Daiichi, 2, Eisai, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, Galapagos, 2, Gilead, 2, GlaxoSmithKline, 2, Janssen, 2, Merck, 2, Novartis, 2, Pfizer, 2, Regeneron, 2, Roche, 2, Sanofi, 2, Takeda, 2, UCB Pharma, 2, Imaging and Rheumatology BV, 4; A. Deodhar, Amgen, 2, Celgene, 2, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, 12, Paid Instructor, AbbVie, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, Glaxo Smith & Kline, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, 12, Paid Instructor, UCB, 2, 5, Janssen, 2, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Mease P, Helliwell P, Gladman D, Poddubnyy D, Baraliakos X, Chakravarty S, Kollmeier A, Xu X, Sheng S, Xu S, Shawi M, van der Heijde D, Deodhar A. Effect of Guselkumab (TREMFYA®), a Selective IL-23p19 Inhibitor, on Axial-Related Endpoints in Patients with Active PsA: Results from a Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study Through 2 Years [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/effect-of-guselkumab-tremfya-a-selective-il-23p19-inhibitor-on-axial-related-endpoints-in-patients-with-active-psa-results-from-a-phase-3-randomized-double-blind-placebo-controlled-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/effect-of-guselkumab-tremfya-a-selective-il-23p19-inhibitor-on-axial-related-endpoints-in-patients-with-active-psa-results-from-a-phase-3-randomized-double-blind-placebo-controlled-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology