ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1576

Effect of Conventional Synthetic and Biological Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs on the Immunogenicity of Hepatitis B Vaccine in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Samanan Intongkam1, Rattapol Pakchotanon2, Sumapa Chaiamnuay2, Paijit Asavatanabodee2 and Pongthorn Narongroeknawin2, 1Internal medicine, Rheumatic Disease Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Phramongkutklao Hospital and Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand, 2Rheumatic Disease Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Phramongkutklao Hospital and Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Hepatitis, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and vaccines

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2015

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Clinical Aspects Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Immunogenicity of pneumococcal and influenza vaccine in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have been assessed in many studies. However, the humoral immune response of hepatitis B vaccination in RA patients is not clearly known. This study aims to assess the humoral immune response of hepatitis B vaccination in RA patients receiving conventional synthetic and biological disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs and bDMARDs).

Methods:

Forty-five patients with RA (study group), 33 patients received only csDMARDs and 12 patients received both csDMARDs and bDMARDs, and 9 healthy age- and sex-matched subjects (control group) were enrolled in this prospective open-label single-center study. All patients had negative results for hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis B core antibody, and hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) on screening. All subjects received 20 μg of recombinant hepatitis B vaccine (Euvax B®) at weeks 0, 4, and 24. Blood samples were collected 8 weeks after receipt of the third vaccine dose to test for anti-HBs. The responder and high responder were defined as anti-HBs levels of ≥ 10 mIU/ml and ≥ 100 mIU/ml, respectively. Treatment related adverse events reported by patients or observed by physician were collected at every visit. The study was approved by the ethic committee and institutional review board.

Results:

Eight weeks after vaccination, the number of responder significantly lower in study group than control group (64% vs 100%, p = 0.04) (Table). In the study group, older age and rituximab use were significantly associated with hepatitis B vaccine non-response (p = 0.04 and p = 0.02, respectively), while disease duration, disease activity, comorbidities, and the use of prednisolone, methotrexate, etanercept, or infliximab were not associated with hepatitis B vaccine non-response. In subgroup analyses, RA patients receiving csDMARDs tended to has lower number of responder compared with control group (70% vs 100%, p = 0.09). However, the number of high responder was significantly lower in patients receiving csDMARDs compared with control group (52% vs 100%, p = 0.01). In RA patients receiving bDMARDs, the number of responder and high responder were significantly lower compared with control group (50% vs 100%, p = 0.02, 42% vs 100%, p = 0.01). No serious adverse event was observed, but one patient (2%) experienced flare of arthritis.

Conclusion:

In RA patients receiving csDMARDs and bDMARDs, older age and rituximab use associated with impaired humoral immune response to hepatitis B vaccine. Further studies are required to confirm these findings in larger numbers of subjects.

Table Proportions of responders and high responders in rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving conventional synthetic and biological disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs compared with healthy subjects

Healthy subjects

(n = 9)

All RA patients

(n = 45)

RA receiving csDMARDs

(n = 33)

RA receiving bDMARDs

(n = 12)

Responder (anti-HBs ≥ 10 mIU/ml), %

100%

64% 

(p = 0.04)

70%

(p = 0.09)

50%

(p = 0.02)

High responder (anti-HBs ≥ 100 mIU/ml), %

100%

49%

(p = 0.01)

52%

(p = 0.01)

42%

(p = 0.01)


Disclosure: S. Intongkam, None; R. Pakchotanon, None; S. Chaiamnuay, None; P. Asavatanabodee, None; P. Narongroeknawin, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Intongkam S, Pakchotanon R, Chaiamnuay S, Asavatanabodee P, Narongroeknawin P. Effect of Conventional Synthetic and Biological Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs on the Immunogenicity of Hepatitis B Vaccine in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/effect-of-conventional-synthetic-and-biological-disease-modifying-anti-rheumatic-drugs-on-the-immunogenicity-of-hepatitis-b-vaccine-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/effect-of-conventional-synthetic-and-biological-disease-modifying-anti-rheumatic-drugs-on-the-immunogenicity-of-hepatitis-b-vaccine-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology