ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 557

Effect of Certolizumab Pegol On the Multiple Facets of Psoriatic Arthritis As Reported by Patients: 24 Week Patient Reported Outcome Results of a Phase 3 Double Blind Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study

Dafna D. Gladman1, Roy Fleischmann2, Geoffroy Coteur3, Franz Woltering4 and Philip J. Mease5, 1Centre for Prognosis Studies in The Rheumatic Diseases, Toronto Western Research Institute, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX, 3UCB Pharma, Brussels, Belgium, 4UCB Pharma, Monheim, Germany, 5Seattle Rheumatology Associates, Seattle, WA

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: anti-TNF therapy, certolizumab pegol, Fatigue, pain and psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Spondylarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis: Clinical Aspects and Treatment

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:

RAPID-PsA (NCT01087788) reports efficacy and safety of certolizumab pegol (CZP), a PEGylated Fc-free anti-TNF, in psoriatic arthritis (PsA).1 The effect of different imputation methodologies on radiographic progression outcomes is reported.

Methods:

The ongoing 158 week (Wk) RAPID-PsA trial is double-blind and placebo (PBO) controlled to Wk24, dose-blind to Wk48 and then open label to Wk158. Recruited patients (pts) had active PsA and had failed ≥1 DMARD. Pts could have been secondary failures to 1 previous anti-TNF. Pts were randomized 1:1:1 to PBO or 400mg CZP at Wk0, 2 and 4 (loading dose, LD) followed by either 200mg CZP every 2 wks (Q2W) or 400mg CZP every 4 wks (Q4W).1 Pre-specified analyses included change from baseline (CFB) in modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) (average scores of 2 independent readers), the primary endpoint, and % non-progressors (mTSS CFB ≤0). In the pre-specified imputation methodology performed in all randomized pts minimum observed baseline (BL) score for missing BL values (0) and maximum observed Wk24 score for missing Wk24 values (356.5) in pts with <2 available x-rays were imputed. Post hoc analyses used alternative methods of imputation for change from BL in mTSS for pts with <2 available x-rays, including no imputation, imputation with the median, mean or maximum CFB in mTSS scores.

Results:

409 pts were randomized. BL demographics were similar between groups. 19.1% and 19.8% of PBO and CZP (combined dose) pts received prior anti-TNF. The pre-specified imputation analysis inappropriately overestimated radiographic progression in all arms including PBO (LS mean 28.9 and 18.3 for PBO and CZP (combined dose) respectively p≥0.05) (Table) as pts with missing Wk24 values were assigned to a change from BL in mTSS of up to 356.5, which is an implausible progression with respect to clinical practice. Significantly more pts were non-progressors in both CZP groups (200mg Q2W and 400mg Q4W) compared with PBO (83.3% and 76.3% vs 34.6%, respectively, p<0.001). Multiple post-hoc analyses showed that CZP effectively inhibited radiographic progression compared to PBO (Table). ACR20 response at Wk12 was significantly higher in both CZP arms (200mg Q2W and 400mg Q4W) vs PBO (58.0% and 51.9% vs 24.3%, respectively, p<0.001). The safety profile was similar to that observed with CZP in RA.

Conclusion:

Conventional radiographic imputation methods showed that CZP effectively inhibited radiographic progression in pts with PsA. Significantly fewer patients had progression with either CZP dose compared to placebo. The highly conservative pre-specified imputation method resulted in an unrealistic assessment of progression in all arms including PBO Differences in methodologies for imputing missing radiographic data can greatly impact assessment and reporting of mean changes from BL in mTSS.

References:

1. Mease PJ. Ann Rheum Dis 2012;71(Suppl3):150

 


 


Disclosure:

D. D. Gladman,
None;

R. Fleischmann,

UCB,

2,

UCB,

5;

G. Coteur,

UCB,

1,

UCB,

3;

F. Woltering,

UCB,

1,

UCB,

3;

P. J. Mease,

UCB,

2,

UCB,

5,

UCB,

8.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/effect-of-certolizumab-pegol-on-the-multiple-facets-of-psoriatic-arthritis-as-reported-by-patients-24-week-patient-reported-outcome-results-of-a-phase-3-double-blind-randomized-placebo-controlled-stu/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology