ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1640

Effect of BMI on Baricitinib Efficacy: Pooled Analysis from Two Phase 3 Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials

Cristiano A.F Zerbini1, David Muram2, Vipin K. Arora2, Jahangir Alam2 and Jeffrey R. Curtis3, 1Centro Paulista de Investigação Clinica, São Paulo, Brazil, 2Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, 3Division Clinical Immunology & Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: body mass, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and treatment

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2016

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy - Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose : The efficacy of some rheumatoid arthritis (RA) therapies is reduced among patients with high BMI. This analysis assessed the effects of baseline BMI on the response to baricitinib treatment in patients with RA and incomplete responses to conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (cDMARDs).

Methods: This post hoc analysis used pooled data from two phase 3, double-blind, randomized, controlled trials of 6-12 months’ duration in patients with RA and an incomplete response to cDMARDs. Efficacy outcomes (e.g., ACR responses, and changes in DAS28-hsCRP, HAQ-DI, SDAI, and CDAI scores) were analyzed by baseline patient BMI tertile (calculated from height and weight measurements at screening).

Results: In all BMI tertiles, patients who received baricitinib 4-mg (n=714) achieved improved clinical outcomes compared to those who received placebo (n=716) in efficacy measures including ACR20, ACR50 and ACR70, mean change in DAS28, SDAI, and CDAI, as well as the proportions of patients who reached low disease activity or remission (Table). No clear pattern emerged to suggest that baseline BMI tertile had a consistent effect on baricitinib efficacy. For some outcomes (e.g., ACR responses), a numeric trend toward reduced efficacy was observed among patients with greater BMI who received baricitinib 4-mg (Table).

Conclusion: Post hoc analysis of these pooled RA trial data suggests that baricitinib therapy is associated with improved clinical outcomes compared to placebo, regardless of baseline patient BMI tertile. As has been shown for other DMARDs, baricitinib treatment effect for patients with higher BMI was numerically smaller than for patients with lower BMI.  

 

Outcome

Lowest BMI Tertile (<22.9)

Middle BMI Tertile (22.9-30.7)

Highest BMI Tertile (>30.7)

ACR20 NRI response, n (%)

 

 

 

Placebo (N=716)

90 (36.1%)

92 (40.4%)

104 (43.5%)

Baricitinib 4 mg (N=714)

160 (68.4%)

166 (68.0%)

152 (64.7%)

ACR50 NRI response, n (%)

 

 

 

Placebo (N=716)

36 (14.5%)

38 (16.7%)

37 (15.5%)

Baricitinib 4 mg (N=714)

103 (44.0%)

110 (45.1%)

81 (34.5%)

ACR70 NRI response, n (%)

 

 

 

Placebo (N=716)

7 (2.8%)

10 (4.4%)

13 (5.4%)

Baricitinib 4 mg (N=714)

44 (18.8%)

51 (20.9%)

37 (15.7%)

DAS28-hsCRP, mLOCF LSM change from baseline (SE)

 

 

 

Placebo (N=716)

-1.2 (0.12)

-0.9 (0.11)

-1.2 (0.10)

Baricitinib 4 mg (N=714)

-2.5 (0.13)

-2.2 (0.11)

-2.0 (0.10)

HAQ-DI, mLOCF LSM change from baseline (SE)

 

 

 

Placebo (N=716)

-0.4 (0.06)

-0.3 (0.05)

-0.4 (0.04)

Baricitinib 4 mg (N=714)

-0.7 (0.06)

-0.6 (0.05)

-0.6 (0.04)

CDAI, mLOCF LSM change from baseline (SE)

 

 

 

Placebo (N=716)

-14.4 (1.25)

-12.2 (1.12)

-15.0 (1.00)

Baricitinib 4 mg (N=714)

-24.0 (1.27)

-21.6 (1.13)

-21.1 (0.99)

SDAI, mLOCF LSM change from baseline (SE)

 

 

 

Placebo (N=716)

-14.6 (1.29)

-12.2 (1.16)

-14.9 (1.03)

Baricitinib 4 mg (N=714)

-25.6 (1.32)

-22.7 (1.17)

-22.2 (1.02)

mTSS change ≤0 LE (no progression of structural damage), n (%)

 

 

 

Placebo (N=716)

137 (60.4%)

155 (74.9%)

176 (83.8%)

Baricitinib 4 mg (N=714)

180 (81.1%)

180 (80.0%)

188 (85.5%)

All outcomes are at week 12 except mTSS is at week 24 with data up to rescue.

 


Disclosure: C. A. F. Zerbini, Pfizer Inc, Merck, Sanofi, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Celltrion, Novartis, 2,Pfizer Inc, Eli Lilly, 8; D. Muram, Eli Lilly and Company, 1,Eli Lilly and Company, 3; V. K. Arora, Eli Lilly and Company, 1,Eli Lilly and Company, 3; J. Alam, Eli Lilly and Company, 1,Eli Lilly and Company, 3; J. R. Curtis, Roche/Genentech, UCB, Janssel, Corrona, Amgen, Pfizer, BMS, Crescendo, AbbVie, 2,Roche/Genentech, UCB, Janssel, Corrona, Amgen, Pfizer, BMS, Crescendo, AbbVie, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Zerbini CAF, Muram D, Arora VK, Alam J, Curtis JR. Effect of BMI on Baricitinib Efficacy: Pooled Analysis from Two Phase 3 Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/effect-of-bmi-on-baricitinib-efficacy-pooled-analysis-from-two-phase-3-rheumatoid-arthritis-clinical-trials/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/effect-of-bmi-on-baricitinib-efficacy-pooled-analysis-from-two-phase-3-rheumatoid-arthritis-clinical-trials/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology