ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2617

Economic Burden of Non-Responders to Biologic DMARD Treatments in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Vibeke Strand1, Namita Tundia2, Yan Song3, Dendy Macaulay4 and Mahesh Fuldeore5, 1School of Medicine, Division of Immunology/Rheumatology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, 2AbbVie, Inc., North Chicago, IL, 3Analysis Group, Inc., Boston, MA, 4Analysis Group, Inc., New York, NY, 5AbbVie, Inc, North Chicago, IL

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: anti-TNF therapy, Biologic drugs, economics and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2016

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy - Poster III

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Biologic agents are effective in treating patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA); however, some patients either fail to respond or lose response over time. This study assessed the direct and indirect economic burden among RA patients who had inadequate responses to initial biologic therapy compared with treatment responders.

Methods: Data from 1/1/1998-3/31/2014 were used from a large de-identified, privately insured claims database, which included work loss from a subset of reporting companies. Study sample consisted of patients with ≥1 claim for a biologic DMARD (bDMARD) approved for treatment of RA and ≥2 RA diagnoses in the claim history, with continuous eligibility for 6 months before (baseline) and 12 months after (study period) the date of the first bDMARD claim (index date). Patients were classified as responders and non-responders based on a validated, claim-based algorithm. All-cause and RA-related healthcare resource use and costs, work loss, and indirect costs during the study period were compared for bDMARD responders vs. non-responders. Multivariable regressions were used to adjust for baseline characteristics. As different treatments were approved over time and the pattern of costs and resources use may have changed, subgroup analyses of resource use and direct costs were conducted for patients with index dates in 1998-2007 and in 2008-2013.

Results: This study included 7,540 eligible RA patients, with 2,527 bDMARD responders and 5,013 non-responders; 407 responders and 723 non-responders had work loss data. Compared with responders, non-responders had significantly higher adjusted rates of resource use, including inpatient admissions (incidence rate ratio [IRR]=1.94), outpatient visits (IRR=1.19), emergency department visits (IRR=1.53), and number of prescription fills (IRR=1.09) (all p-values < 0.001). Non-responders had significantly higher adjusted all-cause and RA-related medical costs compared with responders (all-cause: $12,868 vs. $9,621, RA-related: $5,740 vs. $4,495, adjusted p-values<0.001) (Figure 1). Results for subgroup analyses of resource use and direct costs by index date were consistent with the full sample. Non-responders also had significantly more days of work loss compared with responders (22.1 vs. 16.7 days, IRR=1.21, adjusted p-value=0.007) and higher indirect costs ($3,548 vs. $2,890, adjusted p-value = 0.002).

Conclusion: Two-thirds of RA patients had inadequate responses to their initial bDMARD. These non-responders faced a significantly higher burden, including increased healthcare resource use, direct medical costs, and work loss compared to responders. Figure 1. Medical costs of biologic non-responders vs. responders


Disclosure: V. Strand, AbbVie, 5; N. Tundia, AbbVie, 1,AbbVie, 3; Y. Song, Analysis Group, Inc, 3; D. Macaulay, Analysis Group, Inc, 3; M. Fuldeore, AbbVie, 1,AbbVie, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Strand V, Tundia N, Song Y, Macaulay D, Fuldeore M. Economic Burden of Non-Responders to Biologic DMARD Treatments in Rheumatoid Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/economic-burden-of-non-responders-to-biologic-dmard-treatments-in-rheumatoid-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/economic-burden-of-non-responders-to-biologic-dmard-treatments-in-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology