ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1541

Early Treatment Failure with Apremilast Among Biologic-naïve Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis

Keith Betts 1, Pankaj Patel2, Jinlin Song 1, Jing Zhao 3, Yan Wang 1, Jenny Griffith 2 and Eric Wu 4, 1Analysis Group, Inc., Los Angeles, CA, 2AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, 3Analysis Group, Inc., Denver, CO, 4Analysis Group, Inc., Boston, MA

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: DMARDs and outcomes, Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 11, 2019

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Clinical Poster II: Treatment of Axial Spondyloarthritis & Psoriatic Arthritis

Session Type: Poster Session (Monday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Clinical studies have shown that a large proportion of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients treated with apremilast failed to achieve improved physical function or experienced severe gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms. This study used administrative claims data to evaluate the proportion of biologic treatment-naïve patients experiencing early treatment failure with apremilast, identify characteristics associated with early treatment failure with apremilast, and assess subsequent treatment use after apremilast discontinuation in the real-world setting.

Methods: Adult biologic-naïve patients with PsA and apremilast use during Q1 2013 to Q3 2016 were selected from the IBM MarketScan Research Database (Copyright © 2017 Truven Health Analytics LLC, All Rights Reserved). The index date was defined as the first claim for apremilast after PsA diagnosis. Patients were required to have continuous enrollment during the 6 months before (baseline period) and the 6 months after the index date (study period). Early treatment failure was defined as the occurrence of treatment discontinuation, GI-related healthcare encounters, treatment switching/addition, or dose escalation/reduction within the 6-month study period. Time to treatment failure was described using the Kaplan-Meier method. A logistic regression model was used to assess characteristics associated with early treatment failure with apremilast. Subsequent treatment use was assessed through the end of continuous enrollment among patients who discontinued apremilast within 6 months.

Results: A total of 1,503 biologic-naïve patients with PsA who were treated with apremilast were included, 869 (57.8%) with and 634 (42.2%) without early treatment failure. Median time to apremilast failure was 3.9 months and treatment discontinuation was the most common treatment failure event (Figure 1). Clinically relevant baseline characteristics that were significantly different between patients with and without early apremilast failure were included in the model (Table 1). Presence of GI-related comorbidities (odds ratio [OR]: 1.76, p< 0.001), orally administered corticosteroid use (OR: 1.27, p=0.04), and opioid use (OR: 1.29, p=0.02) were significantly associated with a higher risk of early treatment failure with apremilast. Among the 572 patients (38.1%) who discontinued apremilast within 6 months, 46.5% did not have subsequent treatment use; 20.3% subsequently initiated adalimumab, 15.7% subsequently initiated etanercept, 9.2% subsequently initiated secukinumab, and 9.2% subsequently initiated ustekinumab.

Conclusion: This retrospective claims study showed that approximately 60% of biologic-naïve PsA patients treated with apremilast experienced treatment failure within 6 months. Presence of GI-related comorbidities, use of orally administered corticosteroids, and use of opioids before apremilast initiation were associated with an increased risk of early treatment failure. In addition, approximately 54% of patients initiated a subsequent treatment following apremilast discontinuation. The results of this real-world study are consistent with findings from clinical trials.

Figure 1. Early treatment failure rates with apremilast


Table 1

Table 1. Characteristics associated with early treatment failure with apremilast


Disclosure: K. Betts, AbbVie, 9; P. Patel, AbbVie, 3, 4; J. Song, AbbVie, 9; J. Zhao, AbbVie, 9; Y. Wang, Analysis Group, Inc., 9; J. Griffith, AbbVie, 3, 4; E. Wu, AbbVie, 9.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Betts K, Patel P, Song J, Zhao J, Wang Y, Griffith J, Wu E. Early Treatment Failure with Apremilast Among Biologic-naïve Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/early-treatment-failure-with-apremilast-among-biologic-naive-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/early-treatment-failure-with-apremilast-among-biologic-naive-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology