ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1703

Early Onset of Efficacy with Apremilast Monotherapy in Biologic-Naive Patients with Active Psoriatic Arthritis: A Phase IIIb, Randomized, Controlled Trial

Peter Nash1, Kamal Ohson2, Jessica Walsh3, Nikolay Delev4, Dianne Nguyen4, Lichen Teng4, Juan J Gomez-Reino5 and Jacob A Aelion6, 1University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia, 2Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NF, Canada, 3University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, 4Celgene Corporation, Summit, NJ, 5Hospital Clinico Universitario, Santiago, Spain, 6West Tennessee Research Institute, Jackson, TN

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2016

Title: Spondylarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis – Clinical Aspects and Treatment - Poster II: Psoriatic Arthritis

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: ACTIVE is the first apremilast (APR) trial that evaluated time to onset of efficacy beginning at Wk 2 in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients (pts) who were biologic-naïve and may have had ≤1 prior conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drug. We report the study results through Wk 52.

Methods: Pts were randomized (1:1) to APR 30 mg BID or placebo (PBO). At Wk 16, pts whose swollen and tender joint counts (SJC/TJC) had not improved ≥10% were eligible for early escape (investigator discretion): PBO pts received APR, and APR pts continued on APR. At Wk 24, all pts entered the active treatment phase with APR. The primary endpoint was ACR20 response at Wk 16. Other assessments included changes in DAS-28 (CRP), SJC, TJC, and HAQ-DI, morning stiffness duration/severity, and enthesitis, as measured by the Gladman Enthesitis Index (GEI; 0=no enthesitis, 6=all 6 sites active). Along with collection of safety data, tolerability adverse events (AEs) of diarrhea were further characterized.

Results: A total of 219 pts were randomized (APR: n=110; PBO: n=109); 84.5% completed Wk 24 (APR: n=87; PBO: n=98). Separation in the proportion of ACR20 responders to APR vs PBO was noted at Wk 2 (16.4% vs 6.4%; P=0.0252), the first post-baseline (BL) visit. Early onset of response to APR was observed across clinical assessments, with improvements in DAS-28 (CRP), SJC, HAQ-DI, enthesitis, and morning stiffness severity (Table). At Wk 16, APR showed significant reduction in PsA disease activity and manifestations vs PBO, with an ACR20 response rate of 38.2% vs 20.2% (P=0.0040); DAS-28 (CRP) change of −1.07 vs −0.39 (P<0.0001); SJC change of −44.8% vs 1.9%; HAQ-DI change of −0.21 vs −0.06 (P=0.0229); improvement in morning stiffness severity in 46.4% vs 26.6% of pts; and GEI change of −1.5 vs −0.4 (P=0.0014). With continued APR exposure, the Wk 52 ACR20 response rate was 63.3%, ACR50 and ACR70 response rates were 32.4% and 14.0%, and percent change in SJC was −74.5%. Among APR pts with BL enthesitis, 62.8% reached a GEI of 0. Overall incidence of AEs in the PBO-controlled period was generally similar between APR and PBO. The most commonly reported AEs in ≥5% of pts with APR vs PBO were nasopharyngitis (8.3% vs 6.4%), nausea (8.3% vs 1.8%), headache (7.3% vs 3.7%), hypertension (6.4% vs 6.4%), and diarrhea (14.7% vs 11.0%); using a protocol-defined characterization of diarrhea (≥2 watery/liquid stools/day), overall incidence was lower for APR and PBO (11.0% and 8.3%). Serious AEs were lower with APR vs PBO (2.8% vs 4.6%). In general, no increase was seen in AE incidence/severity with longer-term exposure to APR.

Conclusion: In biologic-naïve pts treated with APR, onset of effect was observed starting with Wk 2, with sustained improvements across PsA manifestations, including morning stiffness and enthesitis through Wk 52. AEs were consistent with those reported for other APR phase III PsA and psoriasis studies.


Disclosure: P. Nash, None; K. Ohson, Celgene Corporation, 2; J. Walsh, Celgene Corporation, Novartis, 5,Amgen, Pfizer, UCB, 2; N. Delev, Celgene Corporation, 3; D. Nguyen, Celgene Corporation, 3; L. Teng, Celgene Corporation, 3; J. J. Gomez-Reino, Roche, Schering-Plough, 2,BMS, Pfizer, Roche, Schering-Plough, UCB, 5; J. A. Aelion, Abbvie, Boehringer, Celgene Corporation, Janssen, 5,Abbvie, Amgen, Boehringer, Celgene Corporation, Janssen, UCB, 2,UCB, 8.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Nash P, Ohson K, Walsh J, Delev N, Nguyen D, Teng L, Gomez-Reino JJ, Aelion JA. Early Onset of Efficacy with Apremilast Monotherapy in Biologic-Naive Patients with Active Psoriatic Arthritis: A Phase IIIb, Randomized, Controlled Trial [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/early-onset-of-efficacy-with-apremilast-monotherapy-in-biologic-naive-patients-with-active-psoriatic-arthritis-a-phase-iiib-randomized-controlled-trial/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/early-onset-of-efficacy-with-apremilast-monotherapy-in-biologic-naive-patients-with-active-psoriatic-arthritis-a-phase-iiib-randomized-controlled-trial/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology