ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 557

Early Intensification of Treatment Induces Superior Outcomes in Two Randomized Trials According to Predicted Vs. Observed Radiographic Progression in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Adrian Levitsky1, Marius C. Wick2, Timo Möttönen3, Marjatta Leirisalo-Repo4, Leena Laasonen5, Hannu Kautiainen6,7, Markku Korpela8, Ronald F. van Vollenhoven1 and Vappu Rantalaiho8, 1Department of Medicine, Unit for Clinical Therapy Research, Inflammatory Diseases (ClinTRID), The Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden, 2Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden, 3Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Turku University Central Hospital, Turku, Finland, 4Rheumatology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland, 5Helsinki Medical Imaging Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland, 6Unit of Primary Health Care, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland, 7Unit of Primary Health Care, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland, 8Department of Internal Medicine, Center for Rheumatic Diseases, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: anti-TNF therapy, DMARDs, Early Rheumatoid Arthritis, prognostic factors and radiography

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2015

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy Poster I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Predicted vs. Observed Radiographic Progression in early Rheumatoid Arthritis (POPeRA) is a method that has previously confirmed the relative radiographic efficacy of synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and anti-TNF treatment (1, 2). Here, we applied the POPeRA technique to the randomized Finnish Rheumatoid Arthritis Combination trial (3) (FIN-RACo, combination vs. single) as well as the NEO-RACo trial (4) (combination+anti-TNF vs. combination+placebo) in order to demonstrate how various treatment modalities affect radiographic progression.

Methods:

POPeRA utilizes the baseline radiographic score divided by the patient-reported symptom duration in months before baseline to predict radiographic outcomes over time, and simulates how patients would progress as if not on treatment. It was applied to 144 and 90 patients with eRA from the FIN-RACo and NEO-RACo trials, respectively. The Larsen score (FIN-RACo) and Sharp-van der Heijde score (SHS) (NEO-RACo) was available at baseline, 2, and 5 years. For FIN-RACo, patients were randomized either to a single DMARD (all starting with sulfasalazine; 60% had prednisolone in accordance to the physician’s judgment) or to more intensive DMARD combination therapy (all starting with triple therapy: methotrexate+sulfasalazine+hydroxychloroquine with prednisolone). In NEO-RACo, all patients were assigned to FIN-RACo combination protocol plus a randomized 6-month induction of either placebo or anti-TNF treatment (infliximab). For both trials, treatment became unrestricted after 2 years.

Results:

In FIN-RACo, combination vs. single therapy resulted in superior outcomes in the change from predicted progression over 2 and 5 years (mean 35.7% reduction vs. -32.9%, a worsening from predicted, p=0.001; 34.2% vs. -17.8%, p=0.003, n=72, respectively). Patients positive for rheumatoid factor (RF) (n=102) had significantly worse changes from predicted at 2 and 5 years than RF-negative patients (n=42) (-13.6 vs. 38.1, p=0.035; -6.7 vs. 44.3, p=0.002, respectively). Superiority for combination vs. single therapy was observed in both RF-positive and RF-negative patients.

In NEO-RACo, combination+6-month anti-TNF therapy (n=44) led to significantly greater reductions from predicted progression than combination+placebo (n=46) both at 2 and 5 years of follow-up (98.5% vs. 83.4%, p=0.005; 92.4% vs. 82.5%, p=0.027, respectively). However, anti-TNF add-on treatment was superior only among RF-positive patients (n=67).

Conclusion:

These results confirm that conventional combination therapy in eRA has a

long-term radiographic benefit versus monotherapy. Using the POPeRA method, the addition of anti-TNF induction therapy for 6 months was shown to further increase the long-term radiographic benefit in RF-positive patients.

References:

1. Wick MC, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64:134–7.

2. Levitsky A, et al. Scand J Rheumatol. 2015 May 20:1-6. [Epub ahead of print].

3. Möttönen T, et al. Lancet. 1999 May 8;353(9164):1568-73.

4. Leirisalo-Repo M, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Jun;72(6):851-7.


Disclosure: A. Levitsky, None; M. C. Wick, None; T. Möttönen, Abbvie, Amgen, BMS, Eli Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, 5; M. Leirisalo-Repo, Abbvie, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, MSD, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, 5; L. Laasonen, Abbvie, Pfizer, MSD, VTT (Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd.), 5; H. Kautiainen, None; M. Korpela, None; R. F. van Vollenhoven, AbbVie, BMS, GSK, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, 2,AbbVie, Biotest, BMS, Crescendo, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, Vertex, 5; V. Rantalaiho, Orion-Farmos Research Foundation, 2,Abbvie, BMS, GSK, Pfizer, MSD, Roche, UCB Pharma, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Levitsky A, Wick MC, Möttönen T, Leirisalo-Repo M, Laasonen L, Kautiainen H, Korpela M, van Vollenhoven RF, Rantalaiho V. Early Intensification of Treatment Induces Superior Outcomes in Two Randomized Trials According to Predicted Vs. Observed Radiographic Progression in Rheumatoid Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/early-intensification-of-treatment-induces-superior-outcomes-in-two-randomized-trials-according-to-predicted-vs-observed-radiographic-progression-in-rheumatoid-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/early-intensification-of-treatment-induces-superior-outcomes-in-two-randomized-trials-according-to-predicted-vs-observed-radiographic-progression-in-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology