ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2031

Early Adherence to Methotrexate in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Is High:  a Prospective Longitudinal Study of New Users

Holly Hope1, Kimme Hyrich2, James Anderson1, Lis Cordingley3 and Suzanne Verstappen2, 1NIHR Manchester Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom, 2Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom, 3Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Institute of Inflammation and Repair, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: methotrexate (MTX) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Epidemiology and Public Health (ACR): Rheumatoid Arthritis Pathogenesis and Treatment

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose Methotrexate (MTX) is the recommended first-line DMARD for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in most countries, however response is not universal. Non-adherence may explain this to some degree. The aim of this analysis was to (1) describe patient self-reported adherence to MTX over the first 6 months of therapy and (2) identify factors associated with non-adherence.

Methods Patients were enrolled in the Rheumatoid Arthritis Medication Study (RAMS) a 1 year prospective study of MTX new-users for RA in the UK. At baseline, data was collected on demographic factors, alcohol and smoking history, disease activity (DAS28) and disease duration. In addition patients completed the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), visual analogue scales (VAS) for pain and fatigue, The Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ), Brief Illness Perceptions Questionnaire (B-IPQ), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the EQ-5D quality of life questionnaire and the Compliance Questionnaire–Rheumatology (CQ-R), a self-report adherence measure. To measure adherence during the first 6 months after MTX commencement patients completed a weekly MTX diary detailing any missed doses including reasons. Proportional adherence was determined using number of non-adherent weeks compared to total number of eligible weeks. Nonadherence was defined as ≥1 dose missed against medical advice. The associations between patient characteristics, measures of illness and medicine cognitions, and adherence were assessed applying adjusted (age, sex, disease duration and disease activity) univariate logistic regression analysis.

Results Analyses included the first 392 patients recruited to RAMS who completed the 6 month diary (median age 61 years, 70% female, mean DAS28 = 4.3 [sd 1.3]. In total, 20% (n=80) of patients reported 174 non-adherent weeks. Reasons for non-adherent weeks included (% weeks): no reason given (30%), adverse effects (28%), feeling unwell/ suspected infection (18%), forgetting (12%), taking a drug holiday (9%) or delayed prescription refill (3%). Overall mean proportional adherence was very high (98%). Of adherent patients, 19% missed at least one dose under medical advice. Factors associated in adjusted analyses with being ever non-adherent included higher baseline DAS28 score (OR 1.31 per unit DAS28 (95%CI:1.06, 1.61) and lower baseline CQ-R score (0.95 per unit CQ-R 95%CI:0.92, 0.99). BMQ concern and necessity scores, HADS depression score, illness perceptions and other patient characteristics were not associated with adherence.

Conclusion Over 20% of individuals were nonadherent although as many patients missed doses under medical advice. The effects of relatively low levels of non-usage of MTX, either due to non-adherence or to advised withdrawal, on disease outcomes is yet to be evaluated, however, these data suggest that levels of overall adherence to MTX over the first 6 months of therapy were very high.

Table 1: Baseline characteristics of cohort and association with nonadherence

Baseline variable

n

Adherent

n

Nonadherent

Adjusted odds ratio (95%CI)Ɨ

p

Age (years)

304

61.4 (51.5-70.1)

79

59.7 (48.6-69.0)

0.98 (0.96-1.00)

0.103

Gender-female

307

210 (68.4%)

79

60 (75.9%)

1.19 (0.65-2.18)

0.578

Currently drinks alcohol

292

213 (72.9%)

83

53 (63.9%)

0.63 (0.37-1.12)

0.116

Currently smokes

305

49 (16.1%)

80

19 (23.8%)

1.50 (0.791-2.85)

0.214

Disease duration (months)

304

9.6 (4.5-31.4)

80

12.9 (5.4-28.9)

1.00 (1.00-1.00)

0.712

1 current co morbidity

312

99(31.7%)

80

25 (31.3%)

1.01 (0.55-1.85)

0.981

≥1 current co morbidity

312

49 (15.7%)

80

17 (21.3%)

1.56(0.75-3.22)

0.233

DAS-28

279

4.3 (3.3-5.3)

74

4.6 (3.9-5.7)

1.31 (1.06-1.61)

0.011*

VAS-pain

302

49 (28-70)

79

49 (25-73)

0.99 (0.98-1.00)

0.109

VAS-fatigue

304

50 (23-71)

78

59 (26-77)

1.00 (0.99-1.01)

0.780

Disability (HAQ)

303

1.0 (0.5-1.6)

80

1.1 (0.4-1.8)

0.89 (0.58-1.37)

0.595

HQOL (EQ-5D)

291

0.74 (0.62-0.80)

78

0.71 ( 0.62-0.80

3.59 (0.20-64.0)

0.384

Depression (HAD)

300

8 (7-9)

78

8 (7-9)

1.12 (0.89-1.41)

0.339

Anxiety (HAD)

295

13 (12-15)

77

14 (12-15)

1.13 (0.95-1.34)

0.178

Necessary beliefs (BMQ)

288

19 (17-23)

76

20 (17.5-22)

0.99 (0.91-1.06)

0.740

Concerns (BMQ)

291

15 (12-17)

77

16 (14-18)

1.02 (0.95-1.10)

0.527

 B-IPQ

280

46 (38-53)

71

47 (39-55)

1.00 (0.97-1.03)

0.907

CQ-R

142

75.4(66.7-84.2)

36

69.3 ( 63.2-76.3)

0.95 (0.92-0.99)

0.009**

All values n(%) or median(IQR) unless stated.

*p < 0.05              ** P < 0.01                          Ɨadjusted for age, gender, DAS28, disease duration


Disclosure:

H. Hope,
None;

K. Hyrich,
None;

J. Anderson,
None;

L. Cordingley,
None;

S. Verstappen,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/early-adherence-to-methotrexate-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-ra-is-high-a-prospective-longitudinal-study-of-new-users/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology