ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 737

Dynamic Prediction of Pulmonary Hypertension Development in Systemic Sclerosis Patients Using Landmark Analysis – Comparison of Two Models

Svetlana I. Nihtyanova1, Voon H. Ong2, Emma C. Derrett-Smith3, Benjamin Schreiber4, J. Gerry Coghlan4, Bianca DeStavola5 and Christopher Denton6, 1Division of Medicine, Centre for Rheumatology and Connective Tissue Diseases, University College London, London, United Kingdom, 2Rheumatology, UCL Division of Medicine, London, United Kingdom, 3Centre for Rheumatology and Connective Tissue Diseases, UCL Division of Medicine, London, United Kingdom, 4National Pulmonary Hypertension Service, Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom, 5Faculty of Population Health Sciences, UCL Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom, 6Department of Rheumatology, University College London, Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: pulmonary complications, scleroderma and systemic sclerosis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 5, 2017

Title: Systemic Sclerosis, Fibrosing Syndromes and Raynaud's – Clinical Aspects and Therapeutics Poster I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) contributes substantially to systemic sclerosis (SSc)-related morbidity and mortality. It tends to develop later in the disease, creating an opportunity for early risk stratification.

Previously published prediction models for PH have been based on cross-sectional data.

We set out to develop a model predicting PH development within 12 months, accounting for disease duration and utilising time-updated clinical characteristics, including serial measurements of lung function. We compare the use of most recent lung function results and serial changes in lung function over the preceding 4 years.

Methods:

We used data from a large unselected longitudinal cohort of SSc patients.

Sequential survival analyses with origins set at 6 consecutive landmark (LM) time-points, 12 months apart, starting at 60 months from disease onset were performed. The predictor variables included time-invariant characteristics (sex, subset and autoantibodies) and LM-specific information (age, presence of organ disease, FVC and DLCO, % predicted). Time to PH from the LMs was calculated with censoring at 12 months. Analyses were combined using a stratified Cox proportional hazards model, with each LM representing a stratum.

Results:

The study cohort consisted of 652 SSc patients. Of those 41.3% had diffuse SSc, 14.9% were male and the average age at disease onset was 48 years. Most patients (96%) either died during follow-up or were followed for over 10 years from disease onset. At the end of follow-up 13.3% of the subjects had developed PH.

The two final multivariable models both included the values at LM of age, presence of pulmonary fibrosis (PF) and antibody specificities (anti-U3RNP and anti-RNA polymerase (ARA)). Model 1 used most recent DLCO values, while Model 2 incorporated patient-specific intercept and slope of DLCO change over the 4 years prior to the LM (Table 1).

Both models were very similar, demonstrating that older age, ARA and anti-U3RNP positivity increase the hazard for PH development. Lower DLCO, both included as most recent measurement and as intercept and slope for the serial change in DLCO over the 4 years prior to LM, predicted increased hazard for PH. This effect was attenuated by presence of clinically-significant PF. None of the estimated effects varied between LM strata.

The two models had very similar fit and discrimination performance with C-index=0.88 for the model with most recent DLCO and C-index=0.87 for the one using intercept and slope for the linear change in DLCO.

Conclusion:

Our results show that comparatively simple models, using only information on age, autoantibodies and serial DLCO assessments could be used for risk stratification and prediction of PH development with good discriminating ability. After validation, this model could be used in clinical practice or for cohort enrichment in clinical trials.

Table 1. Comparison of the two prediction models for PH development

Model 1 Model 2
HR (95% CI) p-value HR (95% CI) p-value
Anti-RNA polymerase antibody 4.9 (1.91, 12.56) 0.001 4.81 (1.87, 12.35) 0.001
Anti-U3RNP antibody 5.97 (1.73, 20.69) 0.005 5.7 (1.62, 20.11) 0.007
Age at landmark, years 1.03 (1.00, 1.06) 0.066 1.03 (1.00, 1.07) 0.043
DLCO last assessment, % 0.9 (0.87, 0.92) <0.001
DLCO last assessment, % x Pulmonary fibrosis 1.05 (1.03, 1.07) <0.001
DLCO intercept, % 0.91 (0.88, 0.94) <0.001
DLCO intercept, % x Pulmonary fibrosis 1.05 (1.03, 1.08) <0.001
DLCO slope, % (standardised) 0.57 (0.42, 0.79) 0.001
Model performance
Akaike information criterion 320.023 325.192
Bayesian information criterion 348.283 359.105
Concordance Index (Harrell’s C) 0.8826 0.8724

Disclosure: S. I. Nihtyanova, None; V. H. Ong, None; E. C. Derrett-Smith, None; B. Schreiber, None; J. G. Coghlan, None; B. DeStavola, None; C. Denton, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Nihtyanova SI, Ong VH, Derrett-Smith EC, Schreiber B, Coghlan JG, DeStavola B, Denton C. Dynamic Prediction of Pulmonary Hypertension Development in Systemic Sclerosis Patients Using Landmark Analysis – Comparison of Two Models [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/dynamic-prediction-of-pulmonary-hypertension-development-in-systemic-sclerosis-patients-using-landmark-analysis-comparison-of-two-models/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/dynamic-prediction-of-pulmonary-hypertension-development-in-systemic-sclerosis-patients-using-landmark-analysis-comparison-of-two-models/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology