ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 481

Duration of Sustained Remission and Differences in Responce Between Medications, in Tumor Necrosis factor inhibitor Treated Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients

Jon T. Einarsson1, Pierre Geborek2, Tore Saxne3 and Meliha C. Kapetanovic4, 1Dept of Clinical Sciences, Section of Rheumatology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden, 2Dept of Clinical Sciences Lund, Section of Rheumatology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden, 3Section of Rheumatology, Deparment of Clinical Sciences, Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden, 4Section of Rheumatology, Dept of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund, Sweden

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: remission and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:

Remission is increasingly becoming a treatment goal in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients and DAS28 remission criteria are widely used, despite their limitations.

The purpose of this study was to study frequency, duration, and timing of sustained remission (SR) defined as DAS<2.6 for at least 6 months, and to compare efficacy of different therapies, in patients with established RA treated with Tumor Necrosis Factor inhibitors (aTNF) in the observational setting of Southern Sweden.

 

Methods:

aTNF treatments in RA patients registered in the SSATG register were eligible for this study. Remission time was defined as time between first visit after treatment initiation with DAS28<2.6 and subsequent visit with DAS28>2.6.

The comparison of the drugs was done using logistic regression analysis, adjusting for baseline variables, and the ORs for achieving SR 12 and 24 months were adjusted for baseline age, disease duration, DAS28, HAQ, concomitant MTX and prednisolone. Life-table techniques were used to estimate SR time, looking only on first biologic treatments.

 

Results:

Of 3446 initiated treatments, 481 (14 %) fulfilled the criteria.  Of those who reached SR 63.2% did so within the first year.

Among patients naïve to biologic treatments and after correction for baseline variables, the ORs for achieving SR within the first 12 months of treatment were 1.9 for etanercept and 1.7 for adalimumab, with infliximab as the reference drug, while etanercept and adalimumab were not significantly different, see figure 1.

Median estimated SR survival time was 3.9 years (etanercept 4.4y, adalimumab 4.8y and infliximab 3.0y). Estimated SR survival was significantly longer for etanercept and adalimumab compared to infliximab (p < 0.05), with no significant difference between etanercept and adalimumab. The estimated SR survival, at 12, 24, and 48 months was 94%, 68% and 48% respectively. After 120 months 11% remained in SR.

 

Conclusion:

Differences were seen in remission rates and duration between different medications.  Within 12 months etanercept and adalimumab had significantly higher likelihood of reaching remission than infliximab, and the estimated remission survival was significantly longer for etanercept and adalimumab compared to infliximab.

Figure 1. Odds of having achieving sustained remission on first biologic after 12 and 24 months, and for all treatments after 24 months.  Drug on right the reference drug.

Adjusted for age, sex, disease duration, concomitant methotrexate and prednisolone treatment, CRP, DAS28 and HAQ score at baseline.

 


Disclosure:

J. T. Einarsson,
None;

P. Geborek,
None;

T. Saxne,
None;

M. C. Kapetanovic,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/duration-of-sustained-remission-and-differences-in-responce-between-medications-in-tumor-necrosis-factor-inhibitor-treated-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology