ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1597

Dose-Response Modeling Is a Useful Tool to Determine Doses for Phase 3: Experience from Olokizumab

Russell Reeve1, Doris Weilert2, Elena Korneva3, Dmitry Koloda3 and Saeed Fatenejad4, 1Quintiles, Inc., Durham, NC, 2Quintiles, Inc., Kansas City, MO, 3R-Pharm CJSC, Moscow, Russian Federation, 4Fatenejad Consultancy, Miami, FL

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: IL-6 and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2016

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy - Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Olokizumab (OKZ) is an anti-interleukin-6 (IL-6) monoclonal antibody in development for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In phase 2 studies, treatment with OKZ+methotrexate (MTX) resulted in significant improvements in disease activity compared to placebo (PBO)+MTX.1,2 Here, we use dose-response modeling based on phase 2 efficacy and safety data to determine the optimal OKZ doses for phase 3 development. This modeling approach utilizes all available data to reach a scientifically-based decision.

Methods: The nonparametric Jonkheere-Terpstra (JT) test was fitted to DAS28(CRP) data from two phase 2, double-blind, randomized, dose-ranging (60 to 480 mg 4-week [wk] cumulative dose [cd]) studies (RA0056 [NCT01242488] and RA0083 [NCT01463059]) to test for a monotonic dose-response curve with no assumptions on curve shape. The JT test indicated that a dose-response model was statistically significant, allowing the Hill parametric model to be used, with study as a categorical covariate that affected both the ED50 and Emax parameters. Mean and 95% confidence intervals for response were calculated. The Hill model fitted the data adequately, allowing estimation of the response curves using all available information. To select an appropriate dose, a balance between both safety and efficacy must be achieved. Thus a dose-response model for the incidence of adverse events (AEs) was also required. A logistic regression model was fitted to the 17 most commonly observed preferred terms across pooled phase 2 data.

Results: The JT test indicated a statistically significant monotonic dose-response relationship: p<0.005 for all dosing regimens (every 2 wks [Q2W] and every 4 wks [Q4W]) in each study, and across pooled data from the two studies. Categorical DAS28(CRP) endpoints also indicated a monotonic dose-response relationship (Table). A parametric dose-response curve fitted using a Hill model3 to combined data from the studies (Figure) adequately described the data, with an inflection point of 120 mg 4-wk cd. This is the smallest dose that attains a response near the maximum. Dosing frequency had a small, non-statistically significant effect on categorical DAS28(CRP) response. Logistic regression analysis of AEs did not indicate a dose-related increase in AEs vs PBO+MTX, with the exception of injection site reaction.

Conclusion: Efficacy increased with dose without an increase in safety events, and plateaued at approximately 120 mg 4-wk cd. Modeling data were robust, with comparable results for individual studies vs pooled data, and continuous vs categorical responses. Thus a dose at the inflection point (128 mg 4-wk cd, given as 64 mg Q2W) and a dose below the inflection point (64 mg 4-wk cd) were selected for inclusion in the phase 3 program. References: 1. Genovese M. Ann Rheum Dis 2014;73(9):1607–15; 2. Takeuchi T. Mod Rheum 2016;26(1):15–23; 3. Reeve R. 2013. J Biopharm Stat 2013;23(3):648–61


Disclosure: R. Reeve, Quintiles, Inc., 3; D. Weilert, Quintiles, Inc., 3; E. Korneva, R-Pharm CJSC, 3; D. Koloda, R-Pharm CJSC, 3; S. Fatenejad, R-Pharm CJSC, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Reeve R, Weilert D, Korneva E, Koloda D, Fatenejad S. Dose-Response Modeling Is a Useful Tool to Determine Doses for Phase 3: Experience from Olokizumab [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/dose-response-modeling-is-a-useful-tool-to-determine-doses-for-phase-3-experience-from-olokizumab/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/dose-response-modeling-is-a-useful-tool-to-determine-doses-for-phase-3-experience-from-olokizumab/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology