ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1234

Does SLE Care in a Lupus Clinic Result in Higher Quality Scores Than in General Rheumatology Clinics?

Shilpa Arora1, Ailda Nika1, Joel Block2, Winston Sequeira1, Jinoos Yazdany3, Laura Trupin3 and Meenakshi Jolly1, 1Rheumatology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, 2Section of Rheumatology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, 3Medicine/Rheumatology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Quality Indicators and SLE

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2016

Title: Health Services Research - Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: We compared the quality of care received by SLE patients at two settings within the same academic institution (lupus clinic or general rheumatology clinic) using validated SLE quality indicators (QI).

Methods: 150 consenting, consecutive patients fulfilling the ACR classification criteria for SLE receiving longitudinal care at Rush University Rheumatology outpatient clinic and subspecialty Lupus clinic were recruited. A validated QI survey was updated, modified and administered during participantsÕ routine visit. Retrospective rheumatology medical chart reviews were done for complete evaluation of performance on each QI. The overall performance rate (total number of QIs met by total number of QIs that the participants were eligible for) and performance on 20 QIs were calculated for the two groups and compared using non-parametric tests. P-value <0.05 was considered significant.

Results: 77 patients from sub-specialty lupus clinic and 73 patients from general rheumatology clinic participated. Patients receiving care at lupus clinic had longer disease duration [9.8 ± 7.1 vs. 7.0 ± 7.2 years; P= 0.02] and met more number of ACR criteria [5.3 ± 1.6 vs. 4.6 ± 1.0; P= 0.001] compared to patients from general rheumatology clinics. The overall performance rate was significantly greater among lupus clinic SLE patients [85.8% (IQR: 19.6%) vs. 70.2% (IQR: 11.5%), P= 0.001]. Differences noted among the two groups were in counseling for use of sunscreen (98.7% vs. 83.6%, p=0.001), testing for antiphospholipid antibodies (71.4% vs. 37%, p< 0.001), recommendation for pneumococcal vaccine if on immunosuppressive medication/s (84.8% vs. 48.8%, p< 0.001), bone mineral density test performance (94.2% vs. 54.5%, p<0.001), counselling about drugs (92.2% vs. 80.8%, p=0.04), prescribing a steroid sparing agent and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor if eligible(100% vs. 82%, p< 0.007 and 94.4% vs. 58.3%, p=0.03, respectively) and assessment of cardiovascular disease risk (40.3% vs. 15.1%, p=0.01) (Figure 1; Table 1). Patients from lupus clinic were less often on corticosteroids as compared to patients from general rheumatology clinic (32.5% vs. 47.9%, p=0.05).

Conclusion: SLE patients seen in the dedicated lupus clinic had better overall and specific QI performance relative to general rheumatology clinics. This may suggest greater recognition among lupus clinic physicians of the importance of preventive care and disease monitoring among SLE patients. Figure 1: Differences in performance of QIs between Lupus clinic and General Rheumatology clinic (p-value <0.05)


Disclosure: S. Arora, None; A. Nika, None; J. Block, None; W. Sequeira, None; J. Yazdany, None; L. Trupin, None; M. Jolly, Pfizer Inc, 9.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Arora S, Nika A, Block J, Sequeira W, Yazdany J, Trupin L, Jolly M. Does SLE Care in a Lupus Clinic Result in Higher Quality Scores Than in General Rheumatology Clinics? [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/does-sle-care-in-a-lupus-clinic-result-in-higher-quality-scores-than-in-general-rheumatology-clinics/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/does-sle-care-in-a-lupus-clinic-result-in-higher-quality-scores-than-in-general-rheumatology-clinics/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology