ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1944

Does Renin Angiotensin System Blockade in Addition to Immunosuppressive Therapy Improve Proteinuria in Acute Lupus Nephritis?

Konstantinos Tselios1, Dafna D Gladman2, Jiandong Su1 and Murray Urowitz2, 1University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2Rheumatology, University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Nephritis and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 22, 2018

Title: 4M107 ACR Abstract: SLE–Clinical II: Renal & Neuropsychiatric Disease in SLE (1941–1945)

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose:

Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are currently recommended for patients with lupus nephritis (LN) as an adjunctive therapy for the optimal control of proteinuria. However, that recommendation is mainly extrapolated from studies in diabetes, hypertension and IgA nephropathy with no supportive evidence from patients with LN. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of such treatment on proteinuria in active LN.

Methods:

Patients from our long-term longitudinal cohort who were treated with glucocorticosteroids (GCS) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF, 2-3g/day) or azathioprine (AZA, 2mg/kg) for their first episode of active LN after 2001 were included. They had at least one year of follow-up with visits at 6 and 12 months. Individuals with end-stage renal disease (eGFR≤15ml/min/1.73m2) or LN class VI at baseline were excluded. Patients were divided into two groups according to the concurrent treatment with ACEIs/ARBs or not. Demographic, clinical, immunological and therapeutic variables were compared at baseline; cumulative GCS dose and blood pressure at baseline, 6 and 12 months were also assessed. Proteinuria (24h) and eGFR were compared at 6 and 12 months after therapy initiation. Complete renal response was defined as proteinuria<500mg/day. Statistical analysis was performed with SAS 9.4; p<0.05 was considered significant.

Results:

One hundred forty three patients were included (77 with concomitant ACEI/ARB treatment and 66 without). There were no significant differences concerning age at LN diagnosis, gender, race, disease duration, SLEDAI-2K and SLICC/Damage Index as well as LN histopathologic class, eGFR and blood pressure at baseline. Severity of proteinuria (2.2±1.5 vs. 2.1±1.8g/day, p=0.78) and nephrotic syndrome (proteinuria>3g/day) were also similar (15.6% vs. 18.2%, p=0.68). There were no differences in the initial GCS and MMF/AZA doses as well as antimalarial usage. Cumulative GCS dose at 12 months and blood pressure at 6 and 12 months were also comparable. Overall, 55.2% of the patients achieved a complete renal response with a significant mean reduction (60%) in proteinuria at 6 and 12 months. Prevalence of complete renal response, level of proteinuria and eGFR between groups are shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Complete response and level of proteinuria and eGFR over time

ACEIs/ARBs (+) (n=77)

ACEIs/ARBs (-) (n=66)

p

Complete renal response at 6 months (%, n)

35.1% (27)

50% (33)

Complete renal response at 12 months (%, n)

49.4% (38)

62.1% (41)

Proteinuria at baseline (mean±SD, g/day)

2.2±1.5

2.1±1.8

Proteinuria at 6 months (mean±SD, g/day)

1.2±1.2

1.1±1.4

Proteinuria reduction at 6 months (% from baseline)

45.5%

47.6%

NS

Proteinuria at 12 months (mean±SD, g/day)

0.9±1.0

0.8±1.3

Proteinuria reduction at 12 months (% from baseline)

59.1%

61.9%

NS

eGFR (ml/min/1.73m2) at baseline (mean±SD)

92±38

104±39

eGFR (ml/min/1.73m2) at 12 months (mean±SD)

89±35

107±34

Change in eGFR at 12 months (% from baseline)

-3.3%

2.9%

NS

A sub-analysis of the patients who were treated only with MMF (n=81, 51 with concomitant ACEI/ARB treatment and 31 without) yielded similar results.

Conclusion:

A majority of patients achieved complete renal response at 12 months without significant differences between groups. Similarly, there was a significant improvement in proteinuria at 6 and 12 months with no significant deterioration of the eGFR and no difference between groups. Renin angiotensin system blockade may not be necessary in the acute phase of LN.


Disclosure: K. Tselios, None; D. D. Gladman, AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene Corporation, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, 2, 5; J. Su, None; M. Urowitz, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Tselios K, Gladman DD, Su J, Urowitz M. Does Renin Angiotensin System Blockade in Addition to Immunosuppressive Therapy Improve Proteinuria in Acute Lupus Nephritis? [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/does-renin-angiotensin-system-blockade-in-addition-to-immunosuppressive-therapy-improve-proteinuria-in-acute-lupus-nephritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/does-renin-angiotensin-system-blockade-in-addition-to-immunosuppressive-therapy-improve-proteinuria-in-acute-lupus-nephritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology