ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2799

Does Early Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Prevent Further Meniscal Damage? Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Barbara Snoeker 1, Frank Roemer 2, Aleksandra Turkiewicz 1, Stefan Lohmander 3, Richard Frobell 1 and Martin Englund1, 1Lund University, Lund, Sweden, 2University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany, 3Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden, Lund, Sweden

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: injury, Knee and meniscus, Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), surgery

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 12, 2019

Title: 5T098: Orthopedics, Low Back Pain & Rehabilitation (2798–2803)

Session Type: ACR/ARP Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:30PM-4:00PM

Background/Purpose: It has been suggested that recurrent instability episodes in a non-reconstructed anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injured knee increase the risk for an incident meniscal tear. However, the evidence comes from observational studies with high risk on selection bias. Our objective was to determine development of meniscal damage over 5 years after ACL injury using data from the only randomized controlled trial in the field, comparing rehabilitation plus early ACL reconstruction (“early ACLR”) vs rehabilitation with optional delayed ACL reconstruction (“optional delayed ACLR”).

Methods: We used longitudinal knee MRIs including 121 young adults (ISRCTN 84752559; ethics approval LU 535-01). One musculoskeletal radiologist read baseline and 5-year follow-up images using the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Osteoarthritis Score (ACLOAS). We defined development of meniscal damage both dichotomously and as sum score representing severity (based on the sum of reclassified ACLOAS meniscus grades). Using a full analyzis set as randomized, we studied the development of meniscal damage (yes/no) with logistic regression, and severity with zero-inflated Poisson regression. Analyses were performed both on knee and on compartment level, and adjusted for age, sex, and baseline meniscal damage.

Results: In early ACLR, 60 of 62 participants remained (2 missing baseline MRIs). In optional delayed ACLR, 55 of 59 subjects had longitudinal MRIs. After 5 years we found a relative risk for development of meniscal damage on knee level of 1.3 (95% confidence interval [95%CI]=0.9-1.9) in optional delayed ACLR vs early ACLR (Table 1). For medial and lateral meniscal damage, respectively, the relative risks were 2.1 (95%CI=1.1-3.9) and 1.0 (95%CI=0.6-1.5). The mean severity score was 1.5 higher (more severe damage) on knee level in optional delayed ACLR vs early ACLR (95%CI=1.1-1.9) among those with meniscal damage at 5 years. For medial and lateral meniscal damage, respectively, the corresponding scores were 1.7 (95%CI=1.2-2.5) and 1.0 (95%CI=0.8-1.4) (Figure 1).

Conclusion: A strategy of early ACLR may reduce development of medial meniscal damage following ACL injury. For the lateral meniscus, ACLR seems neither to be protective nor to increase the risk of damage.


Disclosure: B. Snoeker, None; F. Roemer, BICL, 1, Boston Imaging Core Lab, 1, 6, Shareholder BICL,LLC, 1; A. Turkiewicz, None; S. Lohmander, Pfizer, 8, Roche, 5, GSK, 5, Johnson & Johnson, 5, Galapagos, 5, Regeneron, 5; R. Frobell, None; M. Englund, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Snoeker B, Roemer F, Turkiewicz A, Lohmander S, Frobell R, Englund M. Does Early Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Prevent Further Meniscal Damage? Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/does-early-anterior-cruciate-ligament-reconstruction-prevent-further-meniscal-damage-secondary-analysis-of-a-randomized-controlled-trial/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/does-early-anterior-cruciate-ligament-reconstruction-prevent-further-meniscal-damage-secondary-analysis-of-a-randomized-controlled-trial/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology