ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 771

Does Cognitive Function Change over-Time in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus?

Zahi Touma1, Robin Green2, Carmela Tartaglia3, Lesley Ruttan4, Sabrina Lombardi5, Nicole Anderson6, Jiandong Su1, Kenneth Colosimo4, Michelle Vitti1, Joan E. Wither7, Marvin J. Fritzler8 and Dorcas Beaton9, 1University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2Brain and Therapeutics, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada, 3University of Toronto, Krembil Neurosciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada, 4Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada, 5Psychology & Neuropsychology Complex Injury, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada, 6Division of Rheumatology, University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, 7Department of Immunology, Department of Immunology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 8Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada, 9Mobility Program Clinical Research Unit, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Cognitive dysfunction and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 21, 2018

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Clinical Poster I: Clinical Manifestations and Comorbidity

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Cognitive impairment (CI) is a common neurobehavioral manifestation of SLE. In our recent systematic review, the prevalence of CI was 38% (95% CI: 33-43%).  Studies assessing CI in SLE are mostly cross-sectional and do not provide longitudinal data.  Therefore, we aim to report the prevalence of CI and the change over-time in an SLE cohort using a comprehensive battery (CB) of tests.

 

Methods: Consecutive consenting SLE patients, aged 18-65 years, who attended a single centre (Jul 2016-Apr 2018) were recruited.  Patients were administered the CB at baseline (T0), 6 months (T1) and 12 months (T2) which evaluates the following cognitive domains: simple attention and processing speed, visual-spatial construction, verbal fluency, learning and memory (visuospatial and memory), executive functioning (untimed and timed) and manual motor speed and dexterity.

Patient scores were compared to a normative sample of age- and gender-matched healthy controls to obtain z-scores. CI was operationalized on the CB as a z-score of ≤-1.5 (as compared to controls) on ≥2 domains.  We determined the status of cognitive function based on the CB at T0, T1 and T2.

 

Results: Of the 220 patients (89.1% female), the mean age at SLE diagnosis was 28.3 ± 10.5 and disease duration at enrolment was 14.1 ± 10.4 years (Table 1). The prevalence of CI at T0 in 220 patients was 40.9%. Of the 220 patients, 124 had a 6 month follow-up with a CI prevalence of 29.8% and 71 patients had a 12 month follow-up with a CI prevalence of 35.2%.

 

CI status over 6 months for T0 and T1: Of the 220 patients, 123 had both a T0 and T1 assessment. Sixty-two (50.4%) patients remained non-CI and 30 (24.4%) patients remained CI.  Twenty-four (19.5%) patients transitioned from CI to non-CI at T1 and 7 (5.7%) patients transitioned from non-CI to CI at T1.

 

CI status over 12 months for T0, T1 and T2: Of the 220 patients, 56 patients had 3 assessments at T0, T1 and T2. Of these, 41 (73.2%) patients remained stable across all three time points. Of the 41 patients, 30 patients remained non-CI and 11 patients remained CI over all three time points. Of 56, 15 (26.8%) patients changed CI status from CI to non-CI or vice versa (Table 2).

 

Conclusion:  Cognitive function status in SLE patients fluctuates over time, with 26.8% of patients showing a change in status over a 12-month period. Our results advocate for close monitoring of cognitive function in patients with SLE.

 

 

 

 

 

Table 1. Cohort characteristics at enrolment (n=220)

Characteristic

Value (N=220)

Gender (Female)

196 (89.1%)

Ethnicity:

Asian

Black

Caucasian

Other

18 (8.2%)

45 (20.5%)

128 (58.2%)

25 (11.4%)

Age:

18-29

30-39

40-49

50-59

60-69

38 (17.3%)

57 (25.9%)

55 (25.0%)

50 (22.7%)

20 (9.1%)

Education:

Grade 8

High School

College

University

9 (4.2%)

39 (18.4%)

73 (34.4%)

91 (42.9%)

Age at SLE diagnosis (mean ± SD)

28.3 ± 10.5

Age at enrolment (mean ± SD)

42.4 ± 12.1

Disease duration at enrolment (mean ± SD)

14.1 ± 10.3

 

 

Table 2. CI status at T0, T1 and T2 (N=56)

CI Status

Frequency (%)

Non-CI at all visits

30 (53.6)

CI at all visits

11 (19.6)

Transitioned form non-CI at T0 or T1 to CI at T2

6 (10.7)

Transitioned from CI at T0 or T1 to non-CI T2

9 (16.1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Disclosure: Z. Touma, None; R. Green, None; C. Tartaglia, None; L. Ruttan, None; S. Lombardi, None; N. Anderson, None; J. Su, None; K. Colosimo, None; M. Vitti, None; J. E. Wither, None; M. J. Fritzler, Inova Diagnostics Inc., BioRad, Euroimmun GmbH, Mikrogen GmbH, Dr. Fooke Laboratorien GmbH, ImmunoConcepts, SKF Canada, Amgen and Pfizer, 5,ImmunoConcepts, Inova Diagnostics, Euroimmun GmbH, and Alexion Canada, 7; D. Beaton, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Touma Z, Green R, Tartaglia C, Ruttan L, Lombardi S, Anderson N, Su J, Colosimo K, Vitti M, Wither JE, Fritzler MJ, Beaton D. Does Cognitive Function Change over-Time in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus? [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/does-cognitive-function-change-over-time-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/does-cognitive-function-change-over-time-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology