ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2859

Do Preventive Cardiology Consults Versus Usual Care Improve Cardiovascular Risk Factor Assessment and Management in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis?

Ellen Romich1, Haitham Ahmed2, Amy Nowacki3 and M. Elaine Husni4, 1Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 2Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, 3Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, 4Rheumatology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Best practices, Cardiovascular disease, Electronic Health Record, risk assessment and risk management

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2018

Title: 5T106 ACR Abstract: Measures of Healthcare Quality I: QI in RA (2856–2861)

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients have around 50% increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Both traditional and RA-specific cardiovascular (CV) risk factors contribute to the excess risk. Although RA is an independent risk factor for CVD, management of traditional CV risk factors is inadequate in this population. In order to improve risk factor management, we implemented a best practice alert (BPA) in the electronic health record (EHR) to prompt referral to preventive cardiology. We then investigated the impact of preventive cardiology on CV risk factor assessment and management in RA patients compared to usual care.

Methods: This retrospective cohort included adult RA subjects without CVD who were seen by a board-certified rheumatologist from 2009-2015 and exposed to the BPA, which prompted referral to preventive cardiology. The date that the BPA triggered was the baseline date. The main analysis included intervention subjects (referred and attended cardiology) and primary control subjects (referred but did not attend). A secondary analysis combined additional control subjects (not referred at all) with the primary control group. The primary outcome was CV risk factor assessment, defined as 4 of 5 traditional risk factors measured within one year. The secondary outcome was risk factor management, including starting or adjusting cardiac medications and providing lifestyle management counseling.

Results: 1,979 RA subjects (mean ± standard deviation age: 56 ± 14 years, 80% female, 74% white) were included. Overall, 266 (13%) subjects were referred to preventive cardiology; 145 (55%) subjects attended at least one preventive cardiology appointment (intervention), and 121 (45%) subjects were referred but did not attend (primary control). The remaining 1,713 subjects (not referred at all) were included in the combined control group (n=1834). One-third of subjects had risk factor assessment in the year prior to baseline. In the year after baseline, risk factor assessment occurred in 133 (92%) intervention vs. 35 (29%) primary control subjects (p<0.0001; Figure 1). The intervention group had higher frequency of lipid-lowering medication management (intervention 36% vs. primary control 12%, p<0.0001) and lifestyle management counseling (intervention 46% vs. 3% primary control, p<0.0001). Additionally, the intervention group experienced significant decreases in total cholesterol (-14.6 ± 32.2 mg/dl, p=0.03) and low-density lipoprotein (-13.8 ± 23.8 mg/dl, p=0.002) at one year. Results were similar using the combined control group.

Conclusion: RA patients who attended preventive cardiology visits prompted by an EMR-based technology had increased CV risk factor assessment, pharmacologic and lifestyle management, and improved lipid profiles compared to usual care.


Disclosure: E. Romich, None; H. Ahmed, None; A. Nowacki, None; M. E. Husni, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Romich E, Ahmed H, Nowacki A, Husni ME. Do Preventive Cardiology Consults Versus Usual Care Improve Cardiovascular Risk Factor Assessment and Management in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis? [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/do-preventive-cardiology-consults-versus-usual-care-improve-cardiovascular-risk-factor-assessment-and-management-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/do-preventive-cardiology-consults-versus-usual-care-improve-cardiovascular-risk-factor-assessment-and-management-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology