ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1587

Do Physical Therapists Use Recommended Treatments for Chronic Low Back Pain?

Debbie Feldman1, Jonathan El-Khoury2, Tatiana Orozco1, François Desmeules3, Maude Laliberté1 and Kadija Perreault4, 1Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada, 2Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada, 3Research Centre of Hôpital Maisonneuve Rosemont, Montréal, QC, Canada, 4Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: Back pain, physical therapy, practice guidelines

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 9, 2021

Title: Orthopedics, Low Back Pain, & Rehabilitation Poster (1584–1588)

Session Type: Poster Session D

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Chronic low back pain has been the subject of many studies in medicine and physical therapy for over half a century. Clinical practice guidelines based on evidence have not changed much in the past 30 years, recommending patient education and self-management, and generalized exercise programs. Other treatments such as orthotics, acupuncture, electrotherapies are not recommended, whereas manual therapy, psychological therapies are considered helpful in combination with patient education and exercise. Persons with chronic low back pain often consult a physical therapist. The purpose of our study was to determine whether physical therapists provide recommended treatments for a typical case of chronic low back pain. We also sought to identify factors associated with the use of some specific types of treatment, notably, electrotherapy (which is not recommended) and manual therapy (which can be recommended together with exercise).

Methods: We sent an online survey to physical therapists in the province of Quebec, Canada. The survey contained clinical vignettes of four different cases, one of which was chronic low back pain with sciatica. Participants were asked about what kind of treatment they would provide for this patient showing typical signs and symptoms of chronic low back pain with sciatica as well as whether they would refer the patient to another professional. Descriptive statistics were used to illustrate the proportions for each treatment chosen by physical therapists. We explored associations between choice of treatments with physical therapists’ demographic and practice related factors, using inferential statistics and regression analyses.

Results: There were 176 physical therapists who responded, 41 who identified as male (23.3%) and the majority (63.6%) worked in private practice. The vast majority of physical therapists would provide education (93.8%) and exercise (81.8% mobility exercises, and 65.9% strengthening exercises). Nearly 73% would use manual therapy while 46% would use electrotherapy. The percentage who selected manual therapy together with any type of exercise was 72.7. Many thought it would be important to refer to another health professional such as a family physician (70.6%), a physical therapist who specializes in backs (62.1%), but not to a rheumatologist (0.4%). Regression analyses revealed certain factors associated with the selection of various treatments. Physical therapists with less experience were more likely to select manual therapy (p=0.01) while those working in rural areas were more likely to choose electrotherapy (p=0.03).

Conclusion: Physical therapists would treat a patient with chronic low back pain with the recommended treatments, i.e. education and exercise. Most would also use manual therapy, and for the majority, this was in conjunction with both education and exercise. However, there is a need for improved knowledge translation/education since nearly half would still use the non-recommended electrotherapy treatment.


Disclosures: D. Feldman, None; J. El-Khoury, None; T. Orozco, None; F. Desmeules, None; M. Laliberté, None; K. Perreault, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Feldman D, El-Khoury J, Orozco T, Desmeules F, Laliberté M, Perreault K. Do Physical Therapists Use Recommended Treatments for Chronic Low Back Pain? [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/do-physical-therapists-use-recommended-treatments-for-chronic-low-back-pain/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/do-physical-therapists-use-recommended-treatments-for-chronic-low-back-pain/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology