ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0620

Do Physical Therapists Follow Evidence-Based Practice Recommendations for Treatment of Inflammatory Arthritides?

Debbie Ehrmann Feldman1, Tatiana Orozco1, Sasha Bernatsky2, François Desmeules1, Maude Laliberté3, Kadija Perreault4, Jonathan El-Khoury5, Jean Légaré4 and Linda Woodhouse6, 1Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada, 2The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, ON, Canada, 3Integrated Health and Social Services University Network for West-Central Montreal, Montreal, Canada, 4Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada, 5Université de Sherbrooke, Montreal, QC, Canada, 6Curtin University, Perth, Australia

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: Clinical practice guidelines, physical therapy, practice guidelines

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 7, 2020

Title: Health Services Research Poster

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Physical therapy plays an important role in the global management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Therapeutic exercises (mobility, strength and aerobic) and patient education are recommended whereas passive modalities, such as electrotherapy, are more controversial. Our purpose was to document the type of interventions used by physical therapists for patients with RA and AS, to assess whether intervention choices follow current evidence-based practice recommendations, and to explore factors associated with such choices.

Methods: We sent an online survey to physical therapists in the province of Quebec, Canada. Participants were asked about what kind of treatment they would provide for 2 patients showing typical signs and symptoms of RA and AS. Descriptive statistics were used to illustrate the proportions for each treatment chosen by physical therapists. We explored associations between choice of treatments with physical therapists’ demographic and practice related factors, using inferential statistics and regression analyses.

Results: A total of 298 physical therapists responded to the online survey. For both RA and AS respectively, the most common interventions were mobility exercises (91.0%; 98.3%) and patient education (90.1%; 92.8%). For both cases, just over 60% selected strength exercises. Passive manual forms of therapy were chosen by 36% of PTs for RA and 58% for AS, and electrotherapy was chosen by 30% for RA and 40.9% for AS. Aerobic exercise was rarely selected as a mode of treatment (less than 3% of the PTs for both RA and AS). For RA, choosing electrotherapy (p= 0.006) and passive manual forms of therapy (p< 0.001) were highly associated with working in the private sector. For AS, selecting passive manual forms of therapy were highly associated with working in the private sector (p< 0.001) and having taken post-graduate related courses (p< 0.001).

Conclusion: Most physical therapists chose mobility exercises and patient education, which both represent evidence-based treatment approaches for RA and AS. Despite evidence recommending strength and aerobic exercise for these clienteles, physical therapists underutilize these interventions, especially aerobic exercise. There is a need for better knowledge translation to physical therapists regarding the importance of strength and aerobic exercise for patients with RA and AS.


Disclosure: D. Ehrmann Feldman, None; T. Orozco, None; S. Bernatsky, None; F. Desmeules, None; M. Laliberté, None; K. Perreault, None; J. El-Khoury, None; J. Légaré, None; L. Woodhouse, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Ehrmann Feldman D, Orozco T, Bernatsky S, Desmeules F, Laliberté M, Perreault K, El-Khoury J, Légaré J, Woodhouse L. Do Physical Therapists Follow Evidence-Based Practice Recommendations for Treatment of Inflammatory Arthritides? [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/do-physical-therapists-follow-evidence-based-practice-recommendations-for-treatment-of-inflammatory-arthritides/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/do-physical-therapists-follow-evidence-based-practice-recommendations-for-treatment-of-inflammatory-arthritides/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology