ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 622

DMARD Withdrawal in RA Patients Achieving Therapeutic Response with Certolizumab Pegol Combined with Dmards: Results from a Canadian Randomized Study

Janet E. Pope1, Emmanouil Rampakakis2, Julie Vaillancourt2, Eric Grant3, Louis Bessette4, Juris Lazovskis5, Boulos Haraoui6 and John S. Sampalis7, 1Department of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada, 2JSS Medical Research, Montreal, QC, Canada, 3Private Practice, Saint John, NB, Canada, 4Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada, 5Riverside Professional Centre, Sydney, NS, Canada, 6Institut de Rhumatologie de Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada, 7McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: certolizumab pegol, DMARDs, methotrexate (MTX) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 21, 2018

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Treatments Poster I: Strategy and Epidemiology

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: The efficacy and safety of certolizumab pegol (CZP) in the treatment of adult patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA), when administered either in combination with methotrexate (MTX) or as monotherapy, has been previously shown in several controlled clinical trials. However, a detailed assessment of CZP in combination with a wide range of non-biologic disease-modifying drugs (nbDMARDs) used in clinical practice compared to switching to monotherapy after achieving a response when added to nbDMARD(s) is lacking. The objective of this trial was to compare the effectiveness and tolerability of CZP given as add-on to nbDMARDs, including MTX and others, or as monotherapy after achieving a DAS28(ESR) improvement of ≥1.2.

  Methods: RA patients who had CZP added in clinical practice to their existing DMARD regimen due to inadequate response to their nbDMARD(s) were eligible. At 3 or 6 months, those patients who achieved a change in DAS28 of ≥1.2 were randomized to continue combination therapy (Combination group) or withdraw nbDMARD therapy (Monotherapy group) and be followed up to 18 months. A sample size of 125 randomized patients was estimated to be required to have 100 randomized (50 per group) to detect a difference of 15% in response.  

Results: A total of 124 patients were enrolled, of whom 81 were randomized to continue combination therapy (n=37) or withdraw nbDMARDs (n=44). No significant differences were observed between-groups in baseline age (58.4 vs. 54.2 years), gender (84% vs. 71% female), race (87% vs. 91% Caucasian), rheumatoid factor status (58% vs. 60% positive), or prior biologic experience (16% vs. 11%).

At 18 months, upon adjusting for baseline scores, similar improvements were observed between groups in DAS28(ESR) (-2.1 vs. -2.1) (Figure 1). Furthermore, the odds of achieving DAS28 LDA (OR [95%CI]: 1.08 [0.36-3.23]), ΔDAS28≥1.2 (1.59 [0.51-4.89]), LDA and/or ΔDAS28≥1.2 (1.36 [0.43-4.36), and remission (1.00 [0.35-2.89) were not different between the Combination and Monotherapy groups. Similarly, no differences were observed between groups at 12 months of treatment with respect to these outcomes.

Conclusion: The results suggest that, among RA patients achieving a therapeutic response when on combination therapy with certolizumab pegol and nbDMARDs, nbDMARDs could be withdrawn without significant impact on treatment effectiveness over the next year.

 

Figure 1. DAS28 (ESR) Scores

Figure 2. Proportions of Patients Achieving LDA and Remission at Month 18


Disclosure: J. E. Pope, AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, GSK, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, and UCB, 5, 9; E. Rampakakis, JSS Medical Research, 3; J. Vaillancourt, JSS Medical Research, 3; E. Grant, None; L. Bessette, Amgen, BMS, Janssen, Roche, UCB, AbbVie, Pfizer, Celgene, Eli Lilly, and Novartis, 5,Amgen, BMS, Janssen, Roche, UCB, AbbVie, Pfizer, Merck, Celgene, Sanogi, Eli Lilly, and Novartis, 9,Amgen, BMS, Janssen, Roche, UCB, AbbVie, Pfizer, Merck, Celgene, Eli Lilly, and Novartis, 8; J. Lazovskis, None; B. Haraoui, AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB, 6,AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Janssen, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB, 2,Amgen, BMS, Janssen, Pfizer, and UCB, 8; J. S. Sampalis, JSS Medical Research, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Pope JE, Rampakakis E, Vaillancourt J, Grant E, Bessette L, Lazovskis J, Haraoui B, Sampalis JS. DMARD Withdrawal in RA Patients Achieving Therapeutic Response with Certolizumab Pegol Combined with Dmards: Results from a Canadian Randomized Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/dmard-withdrawal-in-ra-patients-achieving-therapeutic-response-with-certolizumab-pegol-combined-with-dmards-results-from-a-canadian-randomized-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/dmard-withdrawal-in-ra-patients-achieving-therapeutic-response-with-certolizumab-pegol-combined-with-dmards-results-from-a-canadian-randomized-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology