ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1258

Divided By a Common Language: Challenges in Physician-Patient Communication Limit Patient Understanding and Support in Systemic Sclerosis with Interstitial Lung Disease (SSc-ILD)

Christopher Denton1, Bee Laird2, Lizette Moros3 and José Luis Luna Flores4, 1Department of Rheumatology, University College London, Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom, 2Reframe Research, East Sussex, United Kingdom, 3Boehringer-Ingelheim, Ingelheim, Germany, 4Boehringer Ingelheim, Ingelheim, Germany

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: patient assistance, patient engagement and systemic sclerosis, Scleredema

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 6, 2017

Title: Patient Outcomes, Preferences, and Attitudes Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Systemic sclerosis is a potentially life-threatening, clinically diverse, and rare condition. The prognosis and course of disease is difficult to predict and treatment is complex. This can be challenging to understand or explain, posing challenges for effective physician-patient communication. Our study explored communication between physicians and patients with SSc-ILD to assess communication and understanding and identify information gaps and needs.

Methods:

23 20-minute consultations between physicians (rheumatologists, pulmonologists) and patients (19 real, 4 actors) with diagnosed SSc-ILD across 5 countries were directly observed and video/audio recorded. SSc-ILD (limited/diffuse) of all severities, with a range of other organ involvement, was represented. None of the discussants were known to one another. Consultations were analysed using linguistic techniques based on interactional sociolinguistic discourse analysis to understand the pattern and meaning of communication, whether the needs of both participants were met, and the level of understanding between participants.

Results:

The following issues inhibited effective communication between patients and physicians:

  1. 1. Consultation pattern: In most consultations, patients were given little opportunity to explain their concerns or ask questions. Physicians solicited the patient’s story but quickly diverted it to extract clinical information. During effective consultations, patients were invited to tell their story, guided by physicians, who also gathered clinical information. Physicians used techniques to check and demonstrate understanding, express empathy and build rapport.
  1. 2. Use and meaning of language: Physicians used plain language in their explanations but often reverted to medical terminology when the issue became complex. Patients often used medical terminology with limited understanding of the terms. Hence, some physicians mistakenly believed patients had a better understanding than they actually had.
  1. 3. Cognitive models: Physicians and patients had different ways of understanding SSc-ILD based on their knowledge, experiences, expectations and beliefs. This determined what information patients shared and how they interpreted information from physicians. Differences in cognitive models between patients and physicians were responsible for misunderstandings.

Conclusion:

Communication challenges between patients and physicians limit joint understanding of SSc-ILD and may result in both parties missing important information and patients being less aware of self-help management approaches. Strategies should be developed with physicians to facilitate effective communication and increase patient understanding and support.


Disclosure: C. Denton, None; B. Laird, None; L. Moros, None; J. L. Luna Flores, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Denton C, Laird B, Moros L, Luna Flores JL. Divided By a Common Language: Challenges in Physician-Patient Communication Limit Patient Understanding and Support in Systemic Sclerosis with Interstitial Lung Disease (SSc-ILD) [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/divided-by-a-common-language-challenges-in-physician-patient-communication-limit-patient-understanding-and-support-in-systemic-sclerosis-with-interstitial-lung-disease-ssc-ild/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/divided-by-a-common-language-challenges-in-physician-patient-communication-limit-patient-understanding-and-support-in-systemic-sclerosis-with-interstitial-lung-disease-ssc-ild/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology