ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0616

Disparities in Health-Related Quality of Life Among Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Victoria Delk1, Dulaney Wilson2, Gary Gilkeson2, Jim Oates2 and Diane Kamen2, 1Medical University of South Carolina, North Charleston, SC, 2Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: Disparities, quality of life, socioeconomic factors, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 16, 2024

Title: SLE – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a systemic autoimmune disease with the potential to severely diminish patients’ quality of life (QoL). SLE disproportionately affects young Black females in both prevalence and disease severity. One goal of this study was to measure the impact of race and other demographic features on mental and physical QoL domains in patients with SLE compared to controls.

Methods: This study was nested in a longitudinal IRB-approved observational registry of patients with SLE and population-matched unaffected controls. We included adults ≥18 years with and without diagnosed SLE who completed at least one 36-Item Short Form version 2 (SF-36) questionnaire. The SF-36 includes 4 physical component score (PCS) domains and 4 mental component score (MCS) domains. Disease damage was measured using the SLICC/ACR Damage Index (SDI). Comparisons were made between demographic factors, disease factors, and SF-36 scores using t-tests for continuous variables, Chi-squared tests for categorical variables, and multivariable logistic regression.

Results: Included were 514 patients with SLE (71.4% identified as Black, 93.2% female) and 215 controls (81.4% Black, 82.3% female). There were no statistically significant differences between patients and controls in high school graduation or insurance status (comparing insured to uninsured), however a greater proportion of controls had private insurance (76.1% vs. 57.3%, p< 0.01). (Table 1)

When comparing QoL scores, patients with SLE had significantly worse scores in all domains compared to controls (all p< 0.01) except mental health (p=0.84). Compared to non-Black patients with SLE, Black patients had significantly worse SF-36 scores in 3 of the 4 PSC domains (physical function, role-physical, bodily pain) and 1 of the 4 MSC domains (role emotional). Although the total PCS was worse in Black patients (38.2±11.2 vs 40.9±12.9, p=0.02), the total MCS was similar between Black and non-Black patients (p=NS). (Table 2)

Black patients with SLE compared to non-Black had higher rates of discoid rash (21.0 vs 13.1, p< 0.01), alopecia (50.3% vs. 27,7%, p< 0.01), arthritis (80.1% vs. 67.2%, p< 0.01), renal disease (56.4% vs. 27.0, p< 0.01), any disease damage (SDI >0) (69.9% vs. 54.7%, p< 0.01), and high disease damage (SDI≥2) (50.4% vs. 31.4%, p< 0.01). MCS and PCS scores were not significantly different in patients with compared to without renal disease. Over 68.8±44.6 months of follow-up, patients with SLE had no significant change in PCS scores but had a significant improvement in MSC scores over time (by 1.6±11.4, p=0.02), predominately among the Black patients (by 1.8±11.9, p=0.02). In a multivariate regression model, there was no significant association between Black race and either total PCS or MCS once adjusted for age, disease duration, sex, insurance status, BMI, SDI damage score, and depression. (Table 3)

Conclusion: In addition to previously reported disparities in health outcomes between Black and non-Black patients with SLE, our study finds substantial differences in self-reported QoL that are likely multifactorial in etiology. The continuation of this work will help inform future interventions to improve QoL for patients with SLE.

Supporting image 1

Table 1. Demographics of controls and patients with SLE

Supporting image 2

Table 2. SF_36 QoL scores compared between cases and controls and further categorized by race

Supporting image 3

Table 3. Clinical characteristics of patients in SLE and associated SF_36 QoL scores


Disclosures: V. Delk: None; D. Wilson: None; G. Gilkeson: None; J. Oates: None; D. Kamen: Alpine Immune Sciences, 1, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), 1.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Delk V, Wilson D, Gilkeson G, Oates J, Kamen D. Disparities in Health-Related Quality of Life Among Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/disparities-in-health-related-quality-of-life-among-patients-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/disparities-in-health-related-quality-of-life-among-patients-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology