ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1407

Disease Activity Trackers to Support Treat to Target Strategies: A Needs Assessment Survey

Boulos Haraoui1, Majed M. Khraishi2, May Shawi3 and Meagan Rachich4, 1Institut de Rhumatologie de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada, 2Nexus Clinical Research, St Johns, NF, Canada, 3Janssen Inc, Toronto, ON, Canada, 4Medical Affairs, Janssen, Toronto, ON, Canada

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Disease Activity and rheumatic disease

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2016

Title: Quality Measures and Quality of Care - Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:  Custom-built software applications (apps) have become an integral part of medical practice today to help physicians be more efficient. They are being widely used for diagnostic purposes and for monitoring chronic conditions. In rheumatology, medical apps may help health professionals track disease activity and aid treatment decision in real-time to achieve optimal patient outcomes. The objective was to assess the need of a digital disease tracker to monitor disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients and psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

Methods:  A needs assessment survey of Canadian rheumatologists was conducted in the spring of 2015. Our goals were to understand their views about Treat to Target strategies, and their perceptions of digital trackers to provide benefit to their patients and practice.

Results:  Of 410 surveys sent via Survey Monkey, we received 70 responses (17% response rate). Responders were representative of the distribution of rheumatologists in Canada with the majority being in Ontario and Quebec. Among responders, 67% had practiced for 15 to 20 years and were serving predominantly urban patient populations (86%). The majority (56%) utilize both paper and electronic medical records (EMR). An additional 31% use EMR only. The vast majority (87%) accessed EMR via desktop/laptop computer with only 15.7% also utilizing tablets or smart phones. Clinical practice guidelines were widely used (87%) to make treatment decisions. CRA guidelines were mostly commonly selected, followed by ACR then EULAR. Treat to target strategies were employed by 92.86% of respondents, with swollen joint count (85.94%), physician global assessment (69.35%) and patient global assessment (57.14%) being the most common targets while DAS28 (45.45%) and SDAI (42%) were used less frequently . Over 80% of respondents do not use an RA disease tracking tool at this time. However 54.3% of respondents were very interested in having access to an efficient, user-friendly electronic device or app to help assess RA patients’ disease activity at each visit, and track it over time. Many strongly believed such an app would benefit their practice (48.57%) and their patients (44.93%) and felt it was very important that the tracker be integrated with EMR (62.86%). Similar to accessing EMRs most respondents selected desktop/laptop as their preferred device for use of a digital RA Tracker.

Conclusion: Our survey found that most Rheumatologist apply Treat to Target strategies but are not currently using an RA disease tracking tools in their practice. An easy to use digital RA disease assessment tracker may be of value to Rheumatologists in Canada.


Disclosure: B. Haraoui, None; M. M. Khraishi, None; M. Shawi, Janssen, 3,Johnson & Johnson, 1; M. Rachich, Janssen Inc, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Haraoui B, Khraishi MM, Shawi M, Rachich M. Disease Activity Trackers to Support Treat to Target Strategies: A Needs Assessment Survey [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/disease-activity-trackers-to-support-treat-to-target-strategies-a-needs-assessment-survey/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/disease-activity-trackers-to-support-treat-to-target-strategies-a-needs-assessment-survey/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology