ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2299

Disease Activity Scoring: Comparing Patient and Physician Global Assessment Of Disease Activity In Rhumatoid Arthritis Patients Starting a First Biologic Agent

Boulos Haraoui1, Louis Bessette2, Diane Sauvageau1, Jean Pierre Pelletier3, Jean-Pierre Raynauld1, Edith Villeneuve1, Louis Coupal3 and Denis Choquette3, 1Rheumatology, Institut de Rhumatologie de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada, 2Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, pavillon CHUL, Sainte-Foy, QC, Canada, 3Rheumatology, Institut de rhumatologie de Montréal (IRM), Montréal, QC, Canada

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Assessment, measure, patient-reported outcome measures and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis-Clinical Aspects III: Outcome Measures, Socioeconomy, Screening, Biomarkers in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Visual analogue scales (VAS) are routinely used in daily clinical practice and are part of the different composite outcome measures such as the DAS, CDAI and SDAI.  Studies often report weak to moderate positive correlations between physician and patient global assessment of disease activity. It is thought that they are driven by different considerations such as pain, fatigue and mental status for patients and more objective measures such as the swollen joint count and acute phase reactants for physicians. We hypothesized that while absolute values of patient and physician global disease activity do not always correlate, changes in these measures may offer a better correlation. To this end, we looked at global evaluation changes before and after introduction of a first biologic agent in patient with RA.

Methods: We included patients treated for at least 6 months with a first anti-TNF agent (adalimumab, etanercept or infliximab) starting in January 2005.The patient and physician global assessments of disease activity of RA patients were extracted from the RHUMADATA® clinical database and registry. Pearson correlations coefficients between pre, post and pre-post changes in patient and physician assessments were computed (SAS v 9.13) and compared. 

Results: The global disease activity scores from 83 patient-physician pairs were available for this analysis. The pre-treatment assessments were made within 0 and 176 days (mean 33 days) of biologic initiation while the post treatment assessments occurred between 182 and 799 days (mean 268 days). The patient and physician pre, post, and pre-minus-post global assessment means and standard deviations are presented below. The pre and post treatment Pearson correlations coefficients between patient and physician assessments are respectively r2=0.34 (p=0.001) and r2=0.19 (p=0.08). The correlation coefficient between patient and physician change in global assessment is 0.15 (p=0.19).

Physician and patient global disease activity assessment

 

Physician

Patient

Difference (Patient-physician)

 

Mean (StD)

Mean (StD)

Mean (StD)

Pre-treatment

5.27 (1.19)

5.58 (2.96)

0.31 (2.94)

Post-treatment

1.42 (1.78)

3.79 (2.81)

2.37 (3.02)

Difference (post-pre)

-3.85 (2.31)

-1.79 (2.95)

 

Conclusion: While the pre  treatment initiation global disease activity assessments showed moderate correlation, the change in these assessments exhibited a weak relationship. Both physicians and patients agree on disease activity improvement although their magnitudes differ. Reasons for this difference are being explored.


Disclosure:

B. Haraoui,
None;

L. Bessette,
None;

D. Sauvageau,
None;

J. P. Pelletier,
None;

J. P. Raynauld,
None;

E. Villeneuve,
None;

L. Coupal,
None;

D. Choquette,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/disease-activity-scoring-comparing-patient-and-physician-global-assessment-of-disease-activity-in-rhumatoid-arthritis-patients-starting-a-first-biologic-agent/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology