ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 418

Discrepancy in Reported and Actual Rates of Counseling on Teratogenicity and the Need for Contraception When Initiating Mycophenolate in Women of Childbearing Age

Jenna Thomason1 and Alison Bays2, 1Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 2Rheumatology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Counseling, mycophenolate mofetil, quality improvement and quality of care

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2016

Title: Quality Measures and Quality of Care - Poster I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Many women of childbearing potential with autoimmune diseases require terotogenic medications, such as mycophenolate. On October 29, 2007 the FDA deemed mycophenolate a pregnancy class D medication given the risks of first trimester abortion and congenital malformations.1 The encounter when mycophenolate is initiated is arguably the most important time to counsel patients on its risks and the need for effective contraception. We compared reported rates versus actual documentation of counseling in the electronic medical record (EMR).

Methods: We developed a 10 question, anonymous survey that was distributed to all rheumatology providers at our institution. The survey asked respondents at how often they provide and document adequate counseling when initiating mycophenolate in women of childbearing age. Subsequently, using our institution’s De-identified Clinical Data Repository, we identified women aged 17-45 on mycophenolate who had been seen in one of our rheumatology clinics since October 29, 2007, and assessed actual documentation of counseling at initiation of mycophenolate.

Results: Fifteen faculty and fellows (83%) responded to the survey. On average, respondents reported providing and documenting adequate counseling when initiating mycophenolate in 74% and 64% of encounters, respectively. Of 219 charts reviewed, 65 patients met inclusion criteria; the patients included were predominately Caucasian (38%) with an average age of 35. In 5 encounters (8%) providers documented advising the patient that mycophenolate is a teratogen and in only 1 encounter did a provider discuss the specific risks (Table I). The need for contraception while taking mycophenolate and 6 weeks afterwards, as well as the type of contraception utilized were also scarcely documented (n=6, 9%; n=0, 0%; n=9, 14%, respectively). In 22 (34%) encounters providers documented discussion of other side effects or that information was provided. Barriers to effective counseling identified by the survey included lack of time (50%) and inadequate knowledge (33%).

Conclusion: Documentation of counseling on teratogenicity and the need for contraception at the initiation of mycophenolate was reported at much higher rates than was actually observed on chart review, despite higher documentation of other side effects. By educating providers and using the EMR to prompt them to provide counseling when prescribing mycophenolate, we may be able to increase documentation rates. Additionally, “dot phrases” with risks and contraception information could be imported into the provider note and patient instructions as a time saving strategy. Table I. Mean reported rates of counseling on the teratogenicity of mycophenolate and the need for contraception as compared to actual documentation of counseling

Reportedly discussed Reportedly documented Actually documented
(Reported % of initial encounters) (Reported % of initial encounters) N=65 (%)
Counseling point
Mycophenolate use in pregnancy carries an increased risk of 1st trimester abortion 49% 16% 1 (2%)
Mycophenolate use in pregnancy carries an increased risk of congenital malformations 83% 45% 1 (2%)
The patient should use contraception during her entire treatment with mycophenolate 84% 65% 6 (9%)
The patient should continue contraception 6 weeks following cessation of mycophenolate 37% 15% 0 (0%)
The type(s) of contraception utilized (or to be utilized) by the patient 55% 38% 9 (14%)
The patient should alert her doctor when considering pregnancy 87% 60% 2 (3%)

References: 1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2007, October 29) Cellcept (mycophenolate mofetil) October 2007. Retrieved from http://www.fda.gov/Safety/MedWatch/SafetyInformation/SafetyAlertsforHumanMedicalProducts/ucm152095.htm. (Accessed 1/3/2016)


Disclosure: J. Thomason, None; A. Bays, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Thomason J, Bays A. Discrepancy in Reported and Actual Rates of Counseling on Teratogenicity and the Need for Contraception When Initiating Mycophenolate in Women of Childbearing Age [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/discrepancy-in-reported-and-actual-rates-of-counseling-on-teratogenicity-and-the-need-for-contraception-when-initiating-mycophenolate-in-women-of-childbearing-age/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/discrepancy-in-reported-and-actual-rates-of-counseling-on-teratogenicity-and-the-need-for-contraception-when-initiating-mycophenolate-in-women-of-childbearing-age/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology