ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1570

Discrepancies Between Disease Activity and Disease Burden

Margot J.M. Walter1, Adriaan van 't Spijker2, Annelieke Pasma3, Johanna M.W. Hazes4 and Jolanda J. Luime4, 1Rheumatology, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 2Psychiatry, section Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 3Rheumatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 4Rheumatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Activity score and patient questionnaires

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Clinical Practice/Patient Care

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ARHP)

Background/Purpose: In a longitudinal study aiming to use patient self-reported disease activity measured by three domains: functional ability (HAQ), disease activity (RADAI) and fatigue (VAS) to predict change in the subsequent physician assessed DAS28 we failed to demonstrate a sufficient association between both measures. This led to the question to why there is a difference between the self-reported measures and the DAS 28.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to explore the patient’s perspective on the discrepancy between patient self-reported disease activity and physician assessed disease activity.

Methods: An exploratory qualitative methodology using focus groups was applied using a semi-structured interview scheme. Patients were recruited from the RAPPORT study (RA patients from one outpatient clinic in Rotterdam). Four focus groups were convened with 29 participants.

Results: Five themes were identified: balance, mental stress, medication use, feeling of being misunderstood and lack of physical fitness. Balance (1) between activity and rest was reported to easily affect the observed discrepancy. To manage activities patients used planning, adapting, avoiding, but also ignoring of symptoms. Ignoring could results in “off days”, and a number of patients accepted high levels of self-reported disease activity as they did not wish to reduce their level of activities. Mental stress (2) was regarded especially affecting levels of fatigue. Medication intake (3) was felt to have a negative influence on the self-reported measures that was not picked up by the physician measure of disease activity, although some patients mentioned that the relationship between disease and use of medication was difficult to disentangle. Feeling misunderstood (4) by others impacted on well being, maybe not directly affecting levels of self-reported disease activity, but via emotional and cognitive appreciation of the already existing symptoms. Chronicity of the disease (e.g. remarks by family and friends such as “are you still suffering from RA?”), appearing not being ill and pain and fatigue ignored by doctors were discussed. Lack of physical fitness (5) was perceived as having a negative impact on pain and fatigue both in mental and a physical way. Although patients were well aware of the potential positive impact of physical exercise, stress reducing techniques and finding the right balance in activities and rest, for many it was also hard to implement these strategies effectively into daily life.

Conclusion:

Discrepancies between self-reported disease activity and physician reported disease activity in patients with low levels of DAS28 could be themed in mental stress, lack of physical fitness, difficulty in finding balance between rest and activity, feeling misunderstood by others and medication use. Patients highlighted that the reasons of the high disease burden are difficult to explain, and different combination of factors affecting self-reported disease activity hold for individual patients.

Stress management, finding the right balance and tailored physical exercise may help to improve general well being in these patients enabling them to cope better with their rheumatoid arthritis.


Disclosure:

M. J. M. Walter,
None;

A. van ‘t Spijker,
None;

A. Pasma,
None;

J. M. W. Hazes,
None;

J. J. Luime,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/discrepancies-between-disease-activity-and-disease-burden/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology