ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1646

Discontinuation of Methotrexate or Glucocorticoids in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated with Tofacitinib: Clinical Efficacy Data from Long-Term Extension Studies

Roy Fleischmann1, Jürgen Wollenhaupt2, Stanley Cohen1, Michael Weinblatt3, Lisy Wang4, Haiyun Fan5, John Andrews6, Liza Takiya5 and Eustratios Bananis5, 1Metroplex Clinical Research Center and University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 2Schoen-Klinik Hamburg-Eilbek Teaching Hospital of the University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany, 3Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, 4Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT, 5Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA, 6Pfizer Inc, New York, NY

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: glucocorticoids, Methotrexate (MTX) and tofacitinib

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2016

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy - Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of RA. In a post-hoc analysis of the tofacitinib RA long-term extension (LTE) studies, we evaluated the effect of discontinuation of MTX or glucocorticoids (GC) on the maintenance of clinical efficacy of tofacitinib.

Methods: Data were analyzed from 2 open-label studies (NCT00413699 [ongoing; March 2015 data-cut] and NCT00661661) of patients (pts) with RA who completed randomized Phase 1/2/3 tofacitinib studies and 3 years of the LTE studies (LTE baseline to Year 3). Pts in this analysis received tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily (BID) and utilized MTX or GC at LTE baseline. Discontinuation of MTX or GC was defined as no MTX/GC use within the last 30 days prior to the Year 3 visit. Clinical efficacy was evaluated at Year 3 utilizing the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI); further assessment stratified patients by clinical response 3 months after entrance into the LTE studies and was performed for maintenance of response out to Year 3.

Results: Overall, 186/1,608 pts that received MTX at LTE baseline (11.6%; tofacitinib 5 mg BID: n=49; tofacitinib 10 mg BID: n=137) discontinued MTX and 319/1,434 pts that received GC at LTE baseline (22.2%; tofacitinib 5 mg BID: n=114; tofacitinib 10 mg BID: n=205) discontinued GC out to Year 3. Baseline demographics and disease characteristics for pts receiving tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg BID were generally similar irrespective of whether pts discontinued/continued MTX or GC. Most pts who discontinued MTX or discontinued GC achieved CDAI remission (≤2.8) or low disease activity (>2.8–≤10) vs CDAI incomplete response (>10) at Year 3 (Table 1). Mean (standard deviation) time off MTX and GC prior to Year 3, respectively, was 532 (347) and 523 (324) days for tofacitinib 5 mg BID and 593 (338) and 592 (337) days for tofacitinib 10 mg BID. Most pts maintained their 3-month response at Year 3 after the discontinuation of MTX or GC, and response rates were comparable with pts who did not discontinue MTX or GC after Month 3 (Table 2). Furthermore, of those not receiving MTX (1,044 pts) or GC (1,218 pts) at LTE baseline, 65 pts (6.2%; tofacitinib 5 mg BID: n=22; tofacitinib 10 mg BID: n=43) initiated MTX, and 306 pts (25.1%; tofacitinib 5 mg BID: n=82; tofacitinib 10 mg BID: n=224) initiated GC prior to Year 3.

Conclusion: Pts who achieve a high level response with tofacitinib may be able to discontinue MTX or GC and maintain their response. Additional analysis is warranted to understand the reasoning behind why pts initiated MTX or GC in the LTE studies.


Disclosure: R. Fleischmann, Pfizer Inc, 2,Pfizer Inc, 5; J. Wollenhaupt, Pfizer Inc, 8,Pfizer Inc, 1; S. Cohen, Pfizer Inc, 2,Pfizer Inc, 5; M. Weinblatt, Amgen, BMS, Crescendo Bioscience, UCB, 2,Amgen, AbbVie, BMS, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Pfizer Inc, Roche, 5; L. Wang, Pfizer Inc, 1,Pfizer Inc, 3; H. Fan, Pfizer Inc, 1,Pfizer Inc, 3; J. Andrews, Pfizer Inc, 1,Pfizer Inc, 3; L. Takiya, Pfizer Inc, 1,Pfizer Inc, 3; E. Bananis, Pfizer Inc, 3,Pfizer Inc, 1.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Fleischmann R, Wollenhaupt J, Cohen S, Weinblatt M, Wang L, Fan H, Andrews J, Takiya L, Bananis E. Discontinuation of Methotrexate or Glucocorticoids in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated with Tofacitinib: Clinical Efficacy Data from Long-Term Extension Studies [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/discontinuation-of-methotrexate-or-glucocorticoids-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-treated-with-tofacitinib-clinical-efficacy-data-from-long-term-extension-studies/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/discontinuation-of-methotrexate-or-glucocorticoids-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-treated-with-tofacitinib-clinical-efficacy-data-from-long-term-extension-studies/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology