ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 118

Difficult to Treat Gouty Arthritis Associated with Poor Health Related Quality of Life and High Resource Utilization: Post- Hoc Analysis

Louis Bessette1, Frédéric Lioté2, Carmen Moragues3, Rüdiger Moericke4, Zhang Zhiyi5, Alberto Ferreira6, Pascal Lecomte6, Sophia Kessabi6, Haijun Tian7 and Jasvinder A. Singh8,9, 1CHUL, Quebec, QC, Canada, 2Hôpital Lariboisière & University Paris Diderot, Paris, France, 3Hospital Platón, Barcelona, Italy, 4Institut für Präventive Medizin & Klinische Forschung GbR, Magdeburg, Germany, 5The First Affiliated Hospital of Haerbin Medical University, Haerbin, China, 6Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland, 7Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, 8Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 9University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: tophaceous gout

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Health Services Research

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Difficult-to-treat (DTT) group in the MOTION study included symptomatic refractory gouty arthritis (RGA) patients with ≥3 flares, refractory to NSAIDs/colchicine/steroids or to uric acid lowering therapy (ULT) due to contraindication, intolerance, or lack of efficacy. There is lack of evidence on burden of illness in DTT patients. The study assessed burden of illness in DTT patients over 1 year.

Methods: A post hoc descriptive comparison was done between DTT vs the other refractory gout (ORG) patients using data from the MOTION (1 year, multinational, non-interventional, prospective, observational) study. Among DTT patients, outcomes for patients with tophi at baseline and patients who discontinued ULT prior to study entry were also summarized. The study outcomes (evaluated at baseline, by time point and pooled yearly) included health status using EuroQol Group 5‑Dimension (EQ-5D) questionnaire, the Gouty arthritis Assessment Questionnaire–Gouty arthritis Impact Scale (GAQ‑GIS), pain assessment, healthcare utilization over 1 year and lost work productivity. Patient and physician satisfaction with treatment were measured by the Patient Global Assessment of Response to Treatment and Investigator Global Assessment of Response to Treatment. Continuous and categorical variables were reported as (mean ± SD) and as proportions, respectively, for the DTT and ORG patient groups. 

Results: Among 454 patients enrolled in the MOTION study, 64 DTT patients (tophaceous group=29, discontinued ULT=35) were included in the analysis (mean age 55.2, males 85.9%). DTT patients had lower mean EQ-5D utility score and EQ-5D VAS score compared to ORG group, with worse scores in the tophaceous group (Table 1). Tophaceous group patients experienced greater difficulty on all EQ-5D dimensions and pain/discomfort was the most affected dimension in all groups. DTT patients expressed greater overall gouty arthritis concern compared to ORG patients (76.5 vs 72.4%), with highest score in the tophaceous group (85.5%) for pooled data. Tophaceous group reported a higher score on all five dimensions of GAQ GIS. About 45.3% of DTT patients reported severe pain during last flare vs 37.2% ORG patients. Healthcare utilization was greater among DTT than ORG patients (35.9 vs 21.1%). A higher proportion in the tophaceous group visited emergency unit (55.2%), hospital (41.4%) and doctors (89.7%) over one year. Physicians and patients in DTT group were more likely to report poor response to treatment compared to ORG group. DTT group missed 23.4% of their working days compared to 15.6% in ORG patients at baseline, the highest being the tophaceous group (31%).

Conclusion:   DTT patients had worse health status and reported higher resource utilization with significantly poorer outcomes reported in tophaceous gout patients, suggesting a high unmet medical need in such patients.

 


Disclosure:

L. Bessette,

Novartis,

2;

F. Lioté,

Novartis, Ipsen, Sanofi,

1,

Novartis, SOBI, Astra-Zeneca, Savient, Ipsen, Menarini, Mayoly-Spindler ,

2,

Novartis, Ipsen, Menarini, Savient, Astra-Seneca, Mayoly-Spindler,

5;

C. Moragues,

Novartis,

2;

R. Moericke,

Novartis,

2;

Z. Zhiyi,

Novartis,

2;

A. Ferreira,

Novartis Pharma AG, Basel,

3;

P. Lecomte,

Novartis Pharma AG, Basel,

3;

S. Kessabi,

Novartis Pharma AG, Basel,

3;

H. Tian,

Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover NJ,

3;

J. A. Singh,

Takeda, Savient, Novartis ,

2,

Savient, Takeda, Regeneron and Allergan,

5.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/difficult-to-treat-gouty-arthritis-associated-with-poor-health-related-quality-of-life-and-high-resource-utilization-post-hoc-analysis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology