ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 565

Differential Efficacy Of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells On Disease In Murine Lupus Based On Source Of Origin

Erin Collins1, Fei Gu2, Osama S. Naga1, Phil Ruiz3 and Gary S. Gilkeson4, 1Medicine/Rheumatology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 2Division of Rheumatology and Immunology,Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 3Pathology, University of Miami, Miami, FL, 4Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Autoimmunity, Mesenchymal stem cells and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus - Animal Models

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a devastating autoimmune disease that targets multiple organ systems.  Current treatment options for SLE often cause non-specific immune suppression, which can lead to undesirable side effects.  Therefore a new treatment approach with limited harmful side effects, is of particular interest.  A population of non-hematopoetic stem cells, mesenchymal stem cells (MSC), are of increasing interest as a therapeutic option for autoimmune diseases such as SLE.  MSCs can be derived from various sources such as bone marrow or umbilical cords, and have proven successful at suppressing various immune cells.  In this study we examine the efficacy of human MSCs with varying origin on disease in murine based lupus.

Methods: To define the efficacy of human MSCs on murine lupus we harvested MSCs from umbilical cords, healthy donor bone marrow, and lupus patient bone marrow (n=3-4 of each).  At disease onset, 15-17 weeks of age, MRL/lpr mice were intravenously injected with 1×106 MSCs from one of the three MSC origins or PBS.  Urine and blood were collected at 2,4,6 and 8 weeks post transfer to examine urine albumin excretion and anti-dsDNA antibody levels.  Mice were euthanized at 8 weeks post transfer. Kidneys were collected for pathology and immunohistochemistry.  Spleen and bone marrow were harvested to detect presence of plasma cells, B cells, T cells, and Tregs via flow cytometry.

Results:   All mice receiving MSCs from the various sources showed improved survival, increased body weight, and decreased proteinuria compared to untreated controls.  At 8 weeks post MSC transplant, glomerular IgG, but not C3, deposition was significantly decreased in mice receiving umbilical cord and healthy bone marrow MSCs.  However, MSC from lupus patients caused an increase in glomerular C3 and IgG.  Additionally, while the glomerular pathology score was significantly reduced in the umbilical cord and healthy bone marrow mouse groups, there was no change in pathology of the lupus MSC group when compared to PBS control mice.  Although no differences were seen in the percentage of CD4+ or CD8+ T cells between treatment groups, the lupus MSC group experienced a 2-fold increase in the percentage of Foxp3+ cells in the spleen.  These mice also experienced this percentage increase in TCRβ+, B220+, and CD138+ cells in the bone marrow. 

Conclusion:   Our results indicate that human MSC from various origins all made an impact on the disease severity of lupus prone mice.  However, the inability of the lupus patient MSCs to prevent kidney damage suggests that umbilical cord or healthy donor bone marrow MSCs are more effective as disease modulators in vivo.  These data indicate that MSCs derived from lupus patients are not a strong candidate for therapeutic intervention in lupus.


Disclosure:

E. Collins,
None;

F. Gu,
None;

O. S. Naga,
None;

P. Ruiz,
None;

G. S. Gilkeson,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/differential-efficacy-of-human-mesenchymal-stem-cells-on-disease-in-murine-lupus-based-on-source-of-origin/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology