ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 411

Differential Effects of biologics On The Removal Of Amyloid Deposition Between The Kidney and Gastric Tract Of Amyloid A Amyloidosis Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

Hiroshi Uda1, Tamaki Harada2, Ayumi Matsumoto3, Aya Mizumoto2, Toshirou Takama2 and Osamu Saiki1, 1Rheumatology, Higashiosaka City General Hospital, Higashiosaka, Japan, 2Nephrology, Higashiosaka City General Hospital, Higashiosaka, Japan, 3Higashiosaka City General Hospital, Higashiosaka, Japan

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Biologic agents, Kidney and amyloidosis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Clinical Aspects I: Comorbidities in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Several biologics therapy reportedly regress gastric amyloid deposition in amyloid A (AA) amyloidosis patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but it is uncertain whether the biologics therapy can also reduce renal amyloid deposition or not, because it is difficult to repeat a renal biopsy in these patients. We classified renal amyloidosis into two groups, glomerular and vascular types (J. Rheumatology, 2006, 1). In patients with vascular type disease, renal involvements are limited, which enabled us to carry out a follow-up histological study. The main focus of the present study is to compare the regression of amyloid deposition in kidney before and after biologics treatment in patients with vascular type disease.

Methods: The diagnosis of AA amyloidosis was determined by Congo-red stain and anti-AA antibody of gastric biopsy specimen. At first, the RA patients with AA amyloidosis were treated with methotrexate and 5mg of prednisolone, but they did not achieve adequate responses. Subsequently, they were treated with tocilizumab or etanercept for more than three years. Gastric and renal biopsies were performed before and after biologics treatment at least three years’ interval. Renal biopsies were examined only in patients with AA amyloidosis of vascular type disease because renal function does not significantly deteriorate (1).

Results: The vascular type of AA amyloid patients with RA received either etanercept or tocilizumab and the clinical symptoms and laboratory data were significantly improved and sustained for more than 3 years during treating with the biologics. Before biologics treatment, renal biopsy specimens showed amyloid deposition around the blood vessels selectively (Figure A). After biologics treatment (mean 4.5 years), however, amyloid deposition did not significantly regress, similar to those observed in the initial study (Figure B). Renal function of the patients was not also changed significantly. The results of AA deposition in kidney were also confirmed by anti-AA antibody. In the gastrointestinal tract, after treatment (mean 4.5 years) with etanercept or tocilizumab, amyloid deposition was markedly regressed (Figure D) compared to the initial study (Figure C) as reported.

Conclusion: Amyloid deposition of the kidney, unlikely to the gastric tract, does not significantly regress in AA amyloidosis patients with RA by biologics therapy, suggesting that regression of amyloid deposition is differently regulated between the kidney and the gastric tract.

References: 1. Two distinct clinical courses of renal involvement in rheumatoid patients with AA amyloidosis. J Rheumatol. 2006;33:1482-7.

Figure

 Results of renal biopsy (A, B) and gastrointestinal biopsy (C, D) before therapy (A, C) and after therapy (B, D) by etanercept. (Congo red stained; original magnification x 200.)

ACR2013-1.jpg


Disclosure:

H. Uda,
None;

T. Harada,
None;

A. Matsumoto,
None;

A. Mizumoto,
None;

T. Takama,
None;

O. Saiki,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/differential-effects-of-biologics-on-the-removal-of-amyloid-deposition-between-the-kidney-and-gastric-tract-of-amyloid-a-amyloidosis-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology