ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1514

Differences in the Activation Levels and Expression Patterns of the Molecular Targets of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors May Account for the Heterogeneous Treatment Responses

Britta Maurer1, Alfiya Akhmetshina2, Renate E. Gay3, Beat A. Michel3, Steffen Gay4, Joerg H. W. Distler2 and Oliver Distler3, 1Division of Rheumatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, 2Department of Internal Medicine III and Institute for Clinical Immunology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany, 3Department of Rheumatology and Center of Experimental Rheumatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, 4Center of Experimental Rheumatology, University Hospital Zurich and Zurich Center of Integrative Human Physiology (ZIHP), Switzerland, Zurich, Switzerland

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Animal models and systemic sclerosis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Systemic Sclerosis, Fibrosing Syndromes and Raynaud’s – Pathogenesis, Animal Models and Genetics

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: In SSc, treatment responses to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) are less distinct compared to animal models. Therefore, we assessed whether the heterogeneous therapeutic effects could be related to differences in the activation level of the TKI targets c-abl and PDGFRβ.

Methods: Skin sections of bleomycin treated (n=10), Fra-2 transgenic (tg) (n=6), non-bleomycin treated (n=10) and wt mice (n=6), of diffuse (n=10) and limited (n=28) SSc patients and healthy controls (n=8) were analyzed by Masson’s trichrome stain and immunohistochemistry (IHC) using antibodies against p-PDGFRβ and p-c-abl. Subgroups of bleomycin treated (n=8) and Fra-2 tg mice (n=6) were treated with nilotinib. The bleomycin model reflects early pro-inflammatory stages, whereas the Fra-2 model displays features of vasculopathy-induced fibrosis. Parametric non-related data were expressed as mean±SEM, nonparametric non-related data as median(Q1,Q3).

Results: In bleomycin treated mice compared to non-bleomycin controls, the dermal expression of both activated PDGFRβ (10.4(10,11) vs. 3.1(2,5)% cells/HPF) and c-abl (9.1(9,10) vs. 1.5(1,2)% cells/HPF) was strongly upregulated (p<0.05), whereas in Fra-2 tg compared to wt mice, the expression of p-PDGFRβ (8.2(6,12) vs. 5.4(4,7)% cells/HPF) and p-c-abl (2.3(1,6) vs. 5.0(4,7)% cells/HPF) was not significantly increased (p=0.1). In accordance with the strong activation of PDGFRβ and c-abl in the bleomycin model, nilotinib was effective by reducing the increased dermal thickness (293.5±13.3µm) back (226.4±20.6µm) to non-bleomycin levels (224.3±9.3µm, p<0.05). In Fra-2 tg mice, in accordance with the moderate expression of p-PDGFRβ and p-c-abl, nilotinib did not decrease dermal thickness. Given the correlation of activation level and treatment response in the animal models, we examined potential differences in the dermal activation status in subsets of SSc patients and healthy controls. Compared to healthy controls, in limited SSc, there was no significantly increased expression of p-PDGFRβ (3.1±0.2 vs. 7.0±1.2% cells/HPF, p=0.08) and p-c-abl (1.3±0.3 vs. 1.3±0.3% cells/HPF, p=0.9). Interestingly, in diffuse SSc compared to healthy controls and limited SSc, the activation status of both PDGFRβ (8.0±0.9% cells/HPF) and c-abl (3.9±1.2% cells/HPF) was significantly increased (p<0.05). Whereas in the bleomycin model activated PDGFRβ and c-abl were ubiquitously expressed, particularly in skin fibroblasts, in Fra-2 tg mice there was a vascular predominance which might explain the lacking effect of nilotinib on skin fibrosis. In SSc patients, double staining showed that p-PDGFRβ and p-c-abl were most abundantly expressed in vascular smooth muscle cells (SM22α+) and endothelial cells (vWF+), but only occasionally in scattered dermal fibroblasts(prolylhydroxylase+).

Conclusion: Our study suggests that the activation level and the cellular expression pattern of target molecules are able to predict treatment responses in animal models of fibrosis. The predominant vascular expression of TKI targets in SSc patients might account for the minor anti-fibrotic effects of imatinib in clinical SSc trials.


Disclosure:

B. Maurer,
None;

A. Akhmetshina,
None;

R. E. Gay,
None;

B. A. Michel,
None;

S. Gay,
None;

J. H. W. Distler,

Celgene, Bayer Pharma, JB Therapeutics, Anaphore, Sanofi-Aventis, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Array Biopharma and Active Biotech, Actelion, Pfizer, Ergonex and BMS,

2,

4D Science,

1;

O. Distler,

Actelion, Pfizer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bayer, Roche, Ergonex, BMS, Sanofi-Aventis, United BioSource Corporation, medac, Biovitrium, Novartis and Active Biotec,

2,

Actelion, Pfizer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bayer, Roche, Ergonex, BMS, Sanofi-Aventis, United BioSource Corporation, medac, Biovitrium, Novartis and Active Biotec,

5,

Actelion, Pfizer and Ergonex,

8.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/differences-in-the-activation-levels-and-expression-patterns-of-the-molecular-targets-of-tyrosine-kinase-inhibitors-may-account-for-the-heterogeneous-treatment-responses/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology