ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 777

Differences between Temporal Artery Biopsy-Positive and Biopsy-Negative Giant Cell Arteritis: A Comparative Cohort Study

Matthew J. Koster1, Karthik Yeruva1, Cynthia S. Crowson2 and Kenneth J. Warrington1, 1Rheumatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 2Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: biopsies, giant cell arteritis and temporal arteritis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 5, 2017

Title: Vasculitis Poster I: Large Vessel Vasculitis

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the most common systemic vasculitis in patients aged 50 years or older. The presence of cranial features and an abnormal temporal artery biopsy have historically been the primary focus for diagnosis of this condition. A notable percentage of patients with GCA have negative temporal artery biopsies. Few cohort studies exist comparing the presentation and outcome of patients based on biopsy positivity.

Methods: Patients with temporal artery biopsy-negative GCA diagnosed between 1/1/1998 and 12/31/2013 were identified retrospectively. Final diagnosis was confirmed by consensus among two rheumatologists and a physician abstractor. Clinical characteristics, treatment course and outcomes were compared to a cohort of biopsy-positive patients with GCA (n=286) from the same institution.

Results:

110 patients with temporal artery biopsy-negative GCA were identified. Unilateral biopsies were performed in 73, bilateral-sequential in 10, and bilateral same day in 27 cases. Median duration between steroid initiation and biopsy was 3 days. Median length of first biopsy was 14mm and second biopsy (if performed) was 22mm. Among biopsy-negative patients with advanced imaging within 6-months of diagnosis, 67% (41/61) had evidence of large vessel vasculitis.

Patients with biopsy-negative GCA were younger (72.0±9.0 vs 75.0±7.6; p=0.001), met fewer ACR criteria (≥3 criteria 64% vs 95%; p<0.001) and had a shorter time from symptom onset to diagnosis (median 1.1 vs 2.1 months; p<0.001). Vascular risk factors evaluated at diagnosis showed a higher rate of pre-existing hypertension and obesity among patient with biopsy-negative GCA but similar rates of smoking and diabetes mellitus. Frequency of headache and vision loss at time of presentation were similar between groups. However, biopsy-negative GCA patients had more temporal artery tenderness (35% vs 16%; p<0.001) and arm claudication (13% vs 2%; p<0.001) but less frequent jaw claudication (19% vs 52%; p<0.001). Anorexia, fatigue, and arthralgia were also more commonly noted in biopsy-negative patients. Baseline CRP was lower among patients with negative biopsies (44.3±53.6 vs 70.4±63.9 mg/L; p<0.001).

Initial prednisone dose was similar among both cohorts. Although cumulative glucocorticoid (GC) was lower in biopsy-negative patients at 1 year (6.3±2.6 vs 7.2±2.7 g; p=0.004), cumulative GC doses at 2-years and 5-years were equivalent. Biopsy-positive patients (5-years, 56±3%) were able to discontinue GC sooner than biopsy-negative patients (5-years, 30±5%; p<0.001). The number of relapses, time-to-first relapse, annual relapse rate and mortality did not differ based on biopsy positivity.


Conclusion: While similarities are present, there are notable differences in clinical presentation between biopsy-positive and -negative GCA. Although current ACR criteria underperform in patients with biopsy-negative GCA, imaging studies are often useful for confirmation of diagnosis. Further studies are needed to confirm and understand the observed variability in GC duration.


Disclosure: M. J. Koster, None; K. Yeruva, None; C. S. Crowson, None; K. J. Warrington, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Koster MJ, Yeruva K, Crowson CS, Warrington KJ. Differences between Temporal Artery Biopsy-Positive and Biopsy-Negative Giant Cell Arteritis: A Comparative Cohort Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/differences-between-temporal-artery-biopsy-positive-and-biopsy-negative-giant-cell-arteritis-a-comparative-cohort-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/differences-between-temporal-artery-biopsy-positive-and-biopsy-negative-giant-cell-arteritis-a-comparative-cohort-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology