ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2482

Differences and Similarities According to Gender in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis Initiating Biological Therapy

Diego Benavent1, Chamaida Plasencia 2, Victoria Navarro-Compán 3, Laura Nuño 4, Irene Monjo 5, Carolina Tornero 6 and Alejandro Balsa 7, 1Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain, 2Immuno-Rheumatology Research Group, IdiPaz & Rheumatology Department. La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain, 3University Hospital La Paz, IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain, 4Rheumatology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain, Madrid, Spain, 5FIBHULP-IdiPAZ-Hospital La Paz-Rheumatology, Madrid, Spain, 6Rheumatology Department. La Paz University Hospital., Madrid, 7Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: biologic response modifiers and methotrexate (MTX), Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 12, 2019

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Clinical Poster III: Psoriatic Arthritis, Clinical Features

Session Type: Poster Session (Tuesday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Growing evidence has pointed gender as a key variable influencing clinical response to biological drugs in psoriatic arthritis(PsA). Although the reasons remain unclear, it has been hypothesized that different clinical presentations could contribute to this gender-related contrast in treatment effectiveness.
Objective: to analyse the disease profile in male and female patients with PsA starting biological treatment. 

Methods:

Data from an observational prospective cohort including all patients with PsA initiating biological therapy from 2002-2018 in a university hospital was conducted. Demographic information, laboratory tests, disease presentation (axial presentation, including oligoarticular affection, and poliarticular presentation), disease activity indexes (ASDAS and DAPSA for axial and peripheral-only presentations, respectively) and concomitant treatment were collected before starting biological drug. Patients were stratified by gender to compare the characteristics of the populations. Chi-squared for categorical and t-student tests for continuous variables were used to analyse the differences between groups.

Results:

Out of 109 included patients, 55 (51%) were males and 54 (49%) females. Baseline gender-stratified characteristics are shown in  Table 1. Including the whole population of the study, mean age at diagnosis was 57 ± 14.6 years, mean PsA duration was 17.7 ± 9.2 years, and mean Body Mass Index (BMI) was 27.2 ± 4.9. Axial or oligoarticular presentation was shown in 57 patients (52%), whereas 52 patients (48%) had poliarticular manifestations. Mean baseline ASDAS was 3.2 ± 1.0 and mean baseline DAPSA was 25.4 ± 13.6. Biological therapies initiated included etanercept in 42% of the cases, infliximab in 25%, adalimumab in 19%, golimumab in 7% and secukinumab in 6%. No significant differences were observed between genders for most of the characteristics including: age at starting biologic, disease duration, BMI, smoking habit, positive HLA B27 and rheumatoid factor, baseline activity, baseline ESR, baseline CRP, baseline sulfasalazine (SSZ), baseline prednisone (PRD), baseline patient global assessment and biological drug use. However, there was differences between gender in some other characteristics. While males had higher axial presentation of the disease (p=0.01), females had higher poliarticular disease (p=0.02) and used methotrexate more frequently (p=0.02). These differences in methotrexate use might be explained by the predominance of peripheral presentation in female patients.

 

Conclusion:

In clinical practice, biological therapy (TNFi and IL-17i) is prescribed in a similar frequency in male and female patients with PsA. Nevertheless, the predominant articular manifestation behind the prescription of the biological therapy is different among genders: while men have predominant axial disease, women have predominant peripheral manifestations. These differences in clinical presentation in both genders may contribute to differences in therapeutic management, such as increased use of methotrexate in women with PsA who initiate biological therapy.

Table 1. Gender-stratified characteristics at the visit starting the biological therapy. Results are shown as mean -standard deviation- or absolute number -percentage-.


Disclosure: D. Benavent, None; C. Plasencia, None; V. Navarro-Compán, AbbVie, 5, 8, Bristol, 8, Bristol, Roche, 8, Eli Lilly and Company, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Abbvie, UCB, MSD, 5, 8, MSD, 5, 8, Novartis, 5, 8, Pfizer, 5, Roche, 8, UCB, 5, 8; L. Nuño, BMS, 2; I. Monjo, BMS, 2; C. Tornero, None; A. Balsa, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Benavent D, Plasencia C, Navarro-Compán V, Nuño L, Monjo I, Tornero C, Balsa A. Differences and Similarities According to Gender in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis Initiating Biological Therapy [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/differences-and-similarities-according-to-gender-in-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis-initiating-biological-therapy/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/differences-and-similarities-according-to-gender-in-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis-initiating-biological-therapy/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology