ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2248

Difference Between The Two Versions Of Disease Activity Score Based On C-Reactive Protein and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate

Pinar Cetin1, Dilek Solmaz1, Hacer Gulluoglu2, Ismail Sari1, Merih Birlik1, Servet Akar1, Fatos Onen1 and Nurullah Akkoc1, 1Rheumatology, Dokuz Eylul University School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey, 2Internal Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University School of Medicine, Ýzmir, Turkey

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Activity score and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis-Clinical Aspects III: Outcome Measures, Socioeconomy, Screening, Biomarkers in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:

In some countries reimbursement criteria require a DAS28 score of >5.1 for initiating anti-TNF therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. DAS28 score can be calculated based on C-reactive protein (CRP) levels (DAS28-CRP) or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR). The results of a recent mini-survey suggest that Turkish rheumatologists use DAS28-CRP more frequent. The aim of this study was to assess the agreement between the ESR and CRP based DAS28 scores in Turkish patients with RA.

Methods:

84 RA patients from one center with full data for both DAS28-ESR and DAS28-CRP were identified in our biological therapy database (TURKBIO). We compared their DAS28-CRP and DAS-ESR scores obtained from baseline and following visits.  Mean DAS28-ESR and DAS28-CRP values were compared by Spearman correlation and linear regression analysis. Bland-Altman analysis and kappa statistics were used to assess the agreement between the two DAS definitions in the whole group as well as in different gender and age groups.

Results:

Of the 84 patients 71 were females (85%) with a mean age (±SD) of 52.5 (± 14.2).   Disease duration was 10.5 years (±6.2) RF and CCP positivity was 58 % and 63%. DAS28-CRP and DAS28-ESR scores were available for 364visits. Mean DAS28-CRP and DAS-ESR values were 3.3 (±1.4) and 4.0 (±1.4)showing a strong correlation with each other [(Spearman correlation coefficient: 0.947, p<0.001) and linear regression analysis (R²=0.909, p<0.001)]. The agreement between the two DAS versions was good for both genders and all age groups with weighted kappa values ranging from 0.695  to 0.809  The number of visits with high disease activity based on DAS28-ESR was greater than that based on DAS28-CRP (p=0.08). 47 (49%) visits with moderate disease activity according to DAS28-CRP were classified as high according to DAS28-ESR (Table1). Bland-Altman plot analysis showed a mean difference (95% CI) of 0.69 (0.63 - 0.75) between the two methods (DAS28-ESR – DAS28-CRP), which was quite consistent in different gender and age categories (Table 2)

Conclusion:

The results suggest that DAS28-CRP may underestimate disease activity in RA patients, as compared to DAS28-ESR for both genders and different age groups. A significant proportion of patients, who would not qualify for reimbursement of anti-TNF therapy according to DAS28-CRP would be classified as having high disease activity according to DAS28-ESR.

Table-1.Agreement between DAS28-ESR and DAS28-CRP on the classification of the patient visits into different categories of disease activity

 

DAS 28 ESR

≤3.2

3.21-5.10

≥5.11

Total

DAS 28 CRP

≤3.2

128

64

0

192

3.21-5.10

0

74

47

121

≥5.11

0

2

49

51

Total

128

140

96

364

Table 2. Summary of Bland-Altman plot data for comparison of  DAS-ESR and  DAS-CRP in different gender and age categories

Patients  (# of patients, # of visits)

Mean difference

(95% CI)

Lower Limit

(95% CI)

Upper Limit

(95% CI)

Females (n=71, n=308)

0.735

(0.688 -0.783)

0.097

(0.179-0.015)

1.569

(1.487-1.651)

Males (n=13, n=56)

0.471

(0.357-0.589)

0.377

(0.576-0.177)

1.324

(1.124-1.524)

≤40 years  old (n=17, n=65)

0.481

(0.377-0.588)

0.369

(0.533-0.184)

1.331

(1.147-1.516)

41-60 years old (n=42, n=182)

0.791

(0.667-0.795)

0.094

(0.200-0.011)

1.553

(1.447-1.659)

≥61 years old (n=25, n=117)

0.761

(0.683-0.840)

0.080

(0.215-0.054)

1.603

(1.468-1.738)

Overall (n= 84, n=364)

0.695

(0.650-0.740)

0.160

(0.237-0.083)

1.551

(1.473-1.628)


Disclosure:

P. Cetin,
None;

D. Solmaz,
None;

H. Gulluoglu,
None;

I. Sari,
None;

M. Birlik,
None;

S. Akar,
None;

F. Onen,
None;

N. Akkoc,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/difference-between-the-two-versions-of-disease-activity-score-based-on-c-reactive-protein-and-erythrocyte-sedimentation-rate/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology