ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2544

Diagnostic value of vein wall thickness measurement for patients with suspected Behçet syndrome

ruken Alcin Bayraktar1, Yasemin Kayadibi2, Aysenur Kahveci2, Sinem Nihal Esatoglu3, Ibrahim Adaletli2, Yesim Ozguler3, Melike Melikoglu3 and Gulen Hatemi3, 1Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey, 2Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Department of Radiology, Istanbul, Turkey, 3Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Istanbul, Turkey

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Behçet's Syndrome, Ultrasound

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 28, 2025

Title: (2524–2546) Vasculitis – Non-ANCA-Associated & Related Disorders Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Several studies have demonstrated increased venous wall thickness (VWT) in patients with Behçet’s syndrome (BS) compared to healthy and diseased control groups. Ultrasonographic measurement of VWT has been proposed as a potential diagnostic tool to differentiate BS from other diseases. However, the diagnostic utility of this method remains controversial. An optimal approach to evaluate the diagnostic value of VWT measurement would be to perform Doppler ultrasonography in patients referred for screening with a suspicion of BS, and determining the sensitivity and specificity based on the measurements of those who are and who are not diagnosed with BS after a multidisciplinary diagnostic work-up.

Methods: All individuals who presented to our clinic for BS screening between May 2023 and December 2023 were included. Additionally, 30 patients with vascular BS and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and 36 healthy individuals were also enrolled. Two radiologists, blinded to the clinical diagnoses, independently measured the wall thickness of the common femoral vein (CFV), great saphenous vein (GSV), and small saphenous vein (SSV). Results were presented as medians and interquartile ranges, and intergroup comparisons were conducted using the Kruskal–Wallis test.

Results: Among 84 screened individuals, BS was diagnosed in 45 patients, while 39 were found to have non-BS conditions. Lower extremity DVT was present in 5 of the BS patients and in 2 of the non-BS patients. The non-BS group were diagnosed with other conditions including spondyloarthritis, uveitis, inflammatory bowel disease, recurrent aphthous stomatitis, connective tissue diseases, systemic autoinflammatory disorders, and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Compared to other groups, healthy controls were younger, had lower body mass index (BMI), and were less frequently smokers. The highest median CFV thickness was observed in vascular BS patients [right: 0.76 mm (0.63–0.87), left: 0.71 mm (0.62–0.86)], followed by patients diagnosed with BS after screening [right: 0.59 mm (0.53–0.69), left: 0.60 mm (0.50–0.68)], non-BS patients diagnosed after screening [right: 0.58 mm (0.50–0.66), left: 0.57 mm (0.49–0.67)], and healthy controls [right: 0.49 mm (0.47–0.53), left: 0.48 mm (0.43–0.50)]. CFV thickness was significantly higher in vascular BS patients and significantly lower in healthy controls (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). However, there was no significant difference between BS and non-BS patients, and this pattern was consistent across other examined veins. This pattern remained unchanged after excluding the 7 patients with a history of lower extremity DVT. Inter-observer reliability between the radiologists was excellent (ICC for right CFV: 0.97; left CFV: 0.96).

Conclusion: Venous wall thickness was higher in both BS and non-BS patients compared to healthy individuals. However, VWT measurement did not aid in differentiating BS from other inflammatory diseases in patients referred for BS evaluation. The significantly increased VWT in vascular BS raises the question of whether this finding reflects vascular inflammation or vascular remodeling.

Supporting image 1Table 1. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and common femoral vein wall thickness of the patients and the controls

Supporting image 2Figure 1. Right and left common femoral vein wall thickness across diagnostic groups


Disclosures: r. Alcin Bayraktar: None; Y. Kayadibi: None; A. Kahveci: None; S. Esatoglu: None; I. Adaletli: None; Y. Ozguler: None; M. Melikoglu: None; G. Hatemi: AbbVie/Abbott, 6, Amgen, 6, Boehringer-Ingelheim, 2, Novartis, 6, Pfizer, 6, UCB, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Alcin Bayraktar r, Kayadibi Y, Kahveci A, Esatoglu S, Adaletli I, Ozguler Y, Melikoglu M, Hatemi G. Diagnostic value of vein wall thickness measurement for patients with suspected Behçet syndrome [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/diagnostic-value-of-vein-wall-thickness-measurement-for-patients-with-suspected-behcet-syndrome/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/diagnostic-value-of-vein-wall-thickness-measurement-for-patients-with-suspected-behcet-syndrome/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology