ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 3169

Diagnostic Value of Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Gout in a Prospective Cross-Sectional Study

Alexis Ogdie-Beatty1, William J. Taylor2, Tuhina Neogi3, Jaap Fransen4, Tim Jansen5, H. Ralph Schumacher Jr.6 and Nicola Dalbeth7, 1Medicine/Rheumatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 2Department of Medicine, University of Otago Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand, 3Clinical Epidemiology, BUSM, Boston, MA, 4Rheumatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands, 5P O Box 581, Haarlem, Netherlands, 6Medicine, Rheumatology, U Penn & VA Med Ctr, Philadelphia, PA, 7Department of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Diagnostic imaging, gout and ultrasound

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Title: Metabolic and Crystal Arthropathies II: Mechanisms and Associations

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose:
Musculoskeletal ultrasound (US) is a non-invasive option for diagnosing gout.
However, little is known about the test characteristics of US for the diagnosis
of gout in clinical practice. The objective of this study was to determine the diagnostic
performance of ultrasound for the diagnosis of gout using presence of monosodium
urate (MSU) crystals as the gold standard.

Methods: A sub
study was performed within the Study for Updated Gout Classification Criteria (SUGAR),
a large, multi-center observational cross-sectional study in consecutive subjects
with at least one swollen joint who conceivably may have gout. Cases were subjects
with MSU crystal confirmation and controls had an arthrocentesis
negative for MSU crystals. Rheumatologists or radiologists, blinded to the
results of the MSU crystal analysis, performed US on an involved joint. US
findings of interest were: double contour sign (DCS), tophus, and snowstorm appearance.  Sensitivity and specificity were
calculated for these features. Multivariable logistic regression models were
used to examine factors associated with true positive US results.

Results: Among
982 subjects enrolled in SUGAR, ultrasound was performed in 824 subjects (416
cases and 408 controls). 
Sensitivity and specificity for DCS, tophi, snowstorm, and any US
feature for all subjects, those with early (<2 years since symptom onset) versus
late disease (³2 years since symptom onset), and the presence or absence of suspected
clinical tophi on examination are shown in the Table. Among subjects with gout,
249 (60%) subjects had a DCS, 189 (46%) had US evidence of tophus, and 125
(30%) had a “snowstorm” appearance on ultrasound. Associations with a true
positive DCS result included highest ever serum uric acid (SUA; OR 1.31; 95%CI:
1.13-1.53), tender joint proximal to the ankle (2.02; 1.34-3.04) and any xray feature of gout (3.04; 1.95-4.75).  Associations with a true positive US
tophus included suspected clinical tophus on exam (7.47; 4.72-11.84), current
SUA (1.22; 1.05-1.41), and asymmetrical swelling on joint xray
(6.14; 3.93-9.60).  Finally,
associations with a true positive “snowstorm” included suspected clinical
tophus on exam (2.29; 1.40-3.76), cystic changes on X-ray (1.70; 1.06-2.72),
and the number of episodes (compared to 1 as the reference, 2-5 episodes OR
0.20; 0.06-0.51 and >5 episodes OR 0.34; 0.15-0.76).

Conclusion: In
this study, US features of gout have high specificity  (but more limited sensitivity) for gout.  This was also true in subjects with
early disease and in those without suspected clinical tophi on clinical
examination.  However, sensitivity of
DCS and US tophus was  better for subjects with long
standing disease compared to those with early disease. The presence of other
features of gout (e.g. suspected clinical tophus, elevated SUA or xray features) increased the likelihood of achieving a true
positive result.

Table. Sensitivity and Specificity of US Features of Gout

Cases

Controls

Sensitivity

Specificity

Ultrasound: DCS

All subjects

249/414 (60%)

35/408 (9%)

60.1%

91.4%

Early disease (<2 yrs)

55/108 (51%)

15/195 (8%)

50.9%

92.3%

Late disease (³2 yrs)

192/303 (63%)

18/209 (9%)

63.4%

91.4%

No suspected clinical tophus*

141/264 (53%)

27/389 (7%)

53.4%

93.1%

Suspected clinical tophus*

107/149 (72%)

8/19 (42%)

71.8%

57.9%

Ultrasound: Tophus

All subjects

189/411 (46%)

21/408 (5%)

46.0%

94.9%

Early disease (<2 yrs)

36/107 (34%)

9/195 (5%)

33.6%

95.4%

Late disease (³2 yrs)

152/301 (51%)

10/209 (5%)

50.5%

95.2%

No suspected clinical tophus*

77/262 (29%)

13/389 (3%)

29.4%

96.7%

Suspected clinical tophus*

112/148 (76%)

8/19 (42%)

75.7%

57.9%

Ultrasound: Snowstorm

All subjects

125/412 (30%)

37/407 (9%)

30.3%

90.9%

Early disease (<2 yrs)

35/108 (32%)

15/195 (8%)

32.4%

92.3%

Late disease (³2 yrs)

89/301 (30%)

20/208 (10%)

29.7%

90.4%

No suspected clinical tophus*

63/262 (24%)

29/388 (7%)

24.1%

92.5%

Suspected clinical tophus*

62/142 (42%)

8/19 (42%)

41.6%

57.9%

Ultrasound: Any feature

All subjects

320/416 (77%)

64/408 (16%)

76.9%

84.3%

Early disease (<2 yrs)

78/109 (72%)

31/195 (16%)

71.6%

84.1%

Late disease (³2 yrs)

239/304 (79%)

31/209 (15%)

78.6%

85.2%

No suspected clinical tophus*

182/265 (69%)

55/389 (14%)

68.7%

85.9%

Suspected clinical tophus*

137/150 (91%)

9/19 (48%)

91.3%

52.6%

The number of available test results for each imaging feature may differ as some features were not reported for all subjects. 

*Suspected clinical tophus refers to clinically apparent tophus on physical examination



Disclosure: A. Ogdie-Beatty, None; W. J. Taylor, None; T. Neogi, None; J. Fransen, None; T. Jansen, None; H. R. Schumacher Jr., None; N. Dalbeth, Takeda, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, 5,AstraZeneca, 8,Ardea Biosciences, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Ogdie-Beatty A, Taylor WJ, Neogi T, Fransen J, Jansen T, Schumacher HR Jr., Dalbeth N. Diagnostic Value of Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Gout in a Prospective Cross-Sectional Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/diagnostic-value-of-ultrasound-for-the-diagnosis-of-gout-in-a-prospective-cross-sectional-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/diagnostic-value-of-ultrasound-for-the-diagnosis-of-gout-in-a-prospective-cross-sectional-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology