ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1066

Development of a Pharmacy-Led Intervention to Improve Osteoporosis Screening in VA Community-Based Outpatient Clinics

Krista Topalsky1, Lee Arphai2, Mary Ellen Amos2, Amanda Mertz2, Christopher Blum3, Timothy Godbey2, Lori Leonard2, Maya Mattar4, Elizabeth Cable2 and Robert Wenzell2, 1University Hospitals/ Case Western Reserve University, Shaker Heights, OH, 2Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, 3Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, 4Louis Stokes VA medical Center, Mayfield Heights, OH

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: Bone density, Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), osteoporosis, prevention, Women's health

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 17, 2024

Title: Measures & Measurement of Healthcare Quality Poster

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Osteoporosis is a major public health concern in the United States, leading to significant morbidity, mortality, and increased economic burden. Fractures are projected to exceed 3 million at a cost of over $25 billion by 2025. Screening for osteoporosis reduces fracture incidence. Thus, prioritizing screening is essential to lower healthcare costs and improve the quality of life for high-risk patients.

           Osteoporosis screening rates are suboptimal within the VA NEOhio Healthcare System (VANEOHS). Despite a clinical reminder to order DXA scans, primary care clinics only screen 44% of eligible female patients, compared to 90% in non-VA clinics. This quality improvement project aimed to identify barriers to osteoporosis screening throughout the VANEOHS and implement an intervention to improve the screening rate from 63% to 80% in a VA Women’s Health (WH) clinic over 1 year.

Methods: Our team, consisting of clinical pharmacists, physicians, and a Lean Six Sigma coach conducted a quality improvement study in several phases.

  1. Define: we determined a system-wide screening rate by identifying female patients over 65 with a documented DXA scan or diagnosis of osteoporosis/osteopenia coded in the electronic medical record (EMR).
  2. Measure and Analyze: we observed patient visits, sent a survey to 100 primary care providers regarding barriers to screening, the utility of the EMR reminder, and comfort with involving clinical pharmacists in osteoporosis care, and completed a root cause analysis (RCA) to identify areas for process improvement.  
  3. Improve: we used pharmacy-driven solutions to address physician-reported barriers and tested their impact on a small scale. At a single VA Women’s Health clinic, pharmacists identified eligible patients, reviewed records, updated documentation, provided education, ordered DXAs, and scheduled follow-ups. We tracked these actions and calculated a final screening rate after 60 days.

Results:  
 

  1. Define: 44% (653/1492) of eligible females in VA primary care clinics had a DXA scan completed at the VA. Of those with qualifying ICD diagnoses (351), only 244 had a DXA scan.
  2. Measure and Analyze: the provider survey response rate was 20%. 50% of respondents found the EMR reminder helpful, and 50% were willing to consult pharmacists. Physician time constraints, prioritization of other conditions, and discomfort with managing osteoporosis were the most common barriers to screening, as identified in the RCA.
  3. Improve: we calculated an initial screening rate of 63% based on 55 of 87 eligible patients enrolled at our intervention site with a documented DXA or qualifying ICD diagnosis. We eventually excluded 3 patients determined to be ineligible due to death, male sex, and loss of VA services. Pharmacists took over 100 actions for the remaining patients, resulting in a final screening rate of 85% (71/84).

Conclusion: Our study addressed gaps in osteoporosis care with key pharmacist-driven interventions allowing for comprehensive record review and direct patient engagement while also reducing physician workload. Our results demonstrate the impact of a multidisciplinary approach to care and the potential for this model to improve screening-based care in settings beyond the VA.

Supporting image 1

Figure 1. “Fishbone Diagramming” for root cause analysis during the Analyze Phase

Supporting image 2

Table 1. Pharmacist Action During the Implementation Phase

Supporting image 3

Figure 2. Osteoporosis screening rates – baseline, target and 60-day post implementation (actual and anticipated)


Disclosures: K. Topalsky: None; L. Arphai: None; M. Amos: None; A. Mertz: None; C. Blum: None; T. Godbey: None; L. Leonard: None; M. Mattar: None; E. Cable: None; R. Wenzell: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Topalsky K, Arphai L, Amos M, Mertz A, Blum C, Godbey T, Leonard L, Mattar M, Cable E, Wenzell R. Development of a Pharmacy-Led Intervention to Improve Osteoporosis Screening in VA Community-Based Outpatient Clinics [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/development-of-a-pharmacy-led-intervention-to-improve-osteoporosis-screening-in-va-community-based-outpatient-clinics/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/development-of-a-pharmacy-led-intervention-to-improve-osteoporosis-screening-in-va-community-based-outpatient-clinics/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology