ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 918

Development and Validation of a Clinical Rule to Facilitate Recognition of Clinical Arthritis By General Practitioners

Robin M ten Brinck1, Bastiaan T van Dijk2, Hanna W van Steenbergen1, Saskia le Cessie3, Mattijs E Numans4 and Annette H.M. van der Helm-van Mil1, 1Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands, 2Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands, 3Medical statistics and Epidemiology, Department of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands, 4Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Early Rheumatoid Arthritis, Referrals and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 5, 2017

Title: Epidemiology and Public Health II: Non-Genetic Risk Factors for Incident Disease

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose:

Early treatment of rheumatoid arthritis requires the early detection of arthritis. This is generally done by joint examination and difficult for general practitioners (GPs). To promote early recognition of arthritis, the Leiden Early Arthritis Recognition Clinic (EARC) was initiated, where GPs can send patients if in doubt about arthritis (instead of ‘wait-and-see’). Although the EARC importantly improved the early identification, this approach may not be easily implemented at other places. This study determined the discriminative value of a combination of symptoms and other signs for clinical arthritis.

Methods:

1,288 patients visited the EARC between 2010 and 2015. Symptoms and signs were studied with the presence of synovitis (joint examination by experienced rheumatologist) as outcome. Parameters were identified using multivariable logistic regression in 644 patients and validated in another 644 patients. A simplified rule was derived to facilitate application in clinical practice.

Results:

41% had arthritis at examination. Male sex, age ≥60 years, a short symptom duration, morning stiffness >60 minutes, a low number of tender joints, the presence patient-reported swollen swelling and difficulties with making a fist were significantly associated with the presence of arthritis in the derivation cohort. A simplified rule, consisting of these 7 items, was generated (Figure); it had an AUC of 0.74 (95%CI 0.78-0.70). When a sensitive rule is preferred, a cut-off of ≥4 yields a sensitivity of 94%; when a specific rule is preferred the cut-off ≥6 has a specificity of 92%. Risks of arthritis were determined, and also estimated for a setting in which the prevalence of clinical arthritis in patients with suspected arthritis was half of that observed here.

Conclusion:

A rule composed of clinical parameters had a reasonable discriminative ability for clinical arthritis. Ultimately this could assist GPs in decision-making in patients with suspected inflammatory arthritis.

Figure. The Clinical Arthritis Rule (CARE) and corresponding risks of the presence of inflammatory arthritis per score.


Disclosure: R. M. ten Brinck, None; B. T. van Dijk, None; H. W. van Steenbergen, None; S. le Cessie, None; M. E. Numans, None; A. H. M. van der Helm-van Mil, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

ten Brinck RM, van Dijk BT, van Steenbergen HW, le Cessie S, Numans ME, van der Helm-van Mil AHM. Development and Validation of a Clinical Rule to Facilitate Recognition of Clinical Arthritis By General Practitioners [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/development-and-validation-of-a-clinical-rule-to-facilitate-recognition-of-clinical-arthritis-by-general-practitioners/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/development-and-validation-of-a-clinical-rule-to-facilitate-recognition-of-clinical-arthritis-by-general-practitioners/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology