ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2997

Development and External Validation of a Five-Year Mortality Risk Stratification Tool for Early Diffuse Systemic Sclerosis Patients

Robyn T. Domsic1, Svetlana I. Nihtyanova2, Mary Lucas3, Stephen R. Wisniewski4, Michael J. Fine5, C. Kent Kwoh6, Christopher P. Denton7 and Thomas A. Medsger Jr.8, 1Medicine - Rheumatology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 2Department of Rheumatology, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London, United Kingdom, 3Division of Rheumatology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 4Epidemiology Data Center, University of Pittsburgh, Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA, 5General Medicine, University of Pittsburgh and Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare, Pittsburgh, PA, 61501 N. Campbell Avenue, Room 8303, The University of Arizona Arthritis Center, Tucson, AZ, 7Centre for Rheumatology, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London, United Kingdom, 8Medicine/Rheumatology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: morbidity and mortality, risk assessment and systemic sclerosis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Systemic Sclerosis, Fibrosing Syndromes and Raynaud's - Clinical Aspects and Therapeutics III: Updates in Predictors and Outcomes in Systemic Sclerosis

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose :

Knowledge of mortality risk and predictors is important in systemic sclerosis (SSc) patient care and clinical trial design.   There is no validated 5-year mortality model in early diffuse SSc (dcSSc); a high risk population. The objective of this study was to derive and externally validate a 5-year mortality risk stratification tool in early dcSSc patients. 

Methods:

The derivation cohort was a prospectively enrolled inception cohort of adult early dcSSc patients first seen between 1980 and 2009 and enrolled in a US Scleroderma Center databank.  Early dcSSc was defined as < 2 years from the first SSc symptom and proximal skin thickening.  Predefined candidate predictor variables at the first visit (demographic, history, exam, lab values, organ system objective tests) were placed into a stepwise multivariable logistic regression model.  Regression diagnostics were performed.  Beta-estimates were rounded to the nearest 1, and then summed for a total score, which was then classified into low, moderate and high risk morality categories.  The external validation cohort was a large UK Scleroderma Center databank, with patients meeting identical inclusion criteria and an initial visit between 2000 and 2008.  Area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to assess discrimination in the derivation and validation cohorts, and stratum-specific chi-square analysis performed.   

Results:

In the US derivation cohort, 760 early dcSSc patients were identified, of whom 388 were Caucasian and had all objective testing required to assess internal organ involvement at the first visit.  The mean age was 50.4±13.3 years, 76% female and median disease duration 0.93 years (IQR 0.63, 1.33).  The mean skin thickness score was 26.1 ± 11.7.  After 5 years, 110 of the 388 (28.4%) had died.   144 patients composed the UK validation cohort, with no significant differences in age, gender or skin score from the US cohort.  Median disease duration was longer at 1.02 (0.78,1.45) years (p=0.03).  At 5 years 38/144 (26.4%) had died, which was not different (p=0.65) from the US cohort. 

 

Table 1:  Multivariable model and risk point assignment for 5-year mortality

 

Characteristics

 

β

Odds Ratio

95% Confidence Interval

p-value

Point Assigned

Age at first visit (years)    

< 35

35-44

45-54

55-64

>65 

-0.66

-0.38

—

0.76

1.40

0.56

0.69

1.00

1.96

4.12

0.20 – 1.53

0.31 – 1.54

—

0.94 – 4.10

1.92 – 8.85

<0.001

-1

0

0

1

1

Male gender

0.55

1.80

1.01 – 3.20

0.05

1

Tendon friction rubs

1-2

≥3

0.73

1.34

1.94

3.36

1.02 – 3.70

1.71 – 6.59

0.002

1

1

GI involvement*

0.93

2.42

1.39 – 4.21

0.002

1

RNA polymerase III antibody†

-0.86

0.41

0.23 – 0.72

0.002

-1

Anemia (hemoglobin < 12 mg/dL)

0.62

2.17

1.25 – 3.76

0.0006

1

*defined as any one of the following: heartburn plusdysphagia, abnormal esophagram or manometry, antibiotics for or documented small bowel bacterial overgrowth, small bowel dysmotility by radiographic imaging, pseudoobstruction, malabsorption or necessity for hyperalimentation.

†note that RNA polymerase III is protective.

 

Total Sum Score

 

Significant independent predictors of 5-year mortality at first visit were age, gender, tendon friction rubs, GI involvement, RNA polymerase III antibody and anemia (Table 1).  The AUC in the US derivation cohort was 0.79 (95% CI 0.74-0.84) for the overall model and 0.74 (0.65-0.82) in the UK cohort.  Using the total sum score, risk stratification was defined as low (≤ 0), moderate (1-2) and high (≥3) risk.  The AUC for the 3-level risk stratification in the US derivation cohort was 0.76 (0.72-0.81) compared to 0.68 (0.60-0.76) in the UK validation cohort (p=0.24).   There were no significant differences in mortality rate between each strata of the risk stratification model in the US and UK cohorts.  

Conclusion

We have developed and externally validated an easy-to-use 3-level risk stratification tool for 5-year mortality in early dcSSc patients.  This tool requires only history, exam and bloodwork.


Disclosure:

R. T. Domsic,
None;

S. I. Nihtyanova,
None;

M. Lucas,
None;

S. R. Wisniewski,
None;

M. J. Fine,
None;

C. K. Kwoh,
None;

C. P. Denton,
None;

T. A. Medsger Jr.,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/development-and-external-validation-of-a-five-year-mortality-risk-stratification-tool-for-early-diffuse-systemic-sclerosis-patients/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology