ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1920

Determining The Vaccination Rates Of American College Of Rheumatology Recommended Vaccines Among Veterans With Rheumatoid Arthritis – A Quality Indicator

Puneet Bajaj1, Melinda Collins2 and Ranjan Roy1, 1Rheumatology, VA Medical Center, Northport, NY, 2Internal Medicine, VA Medical Center, Northport, NY

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Quality, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and vaccines

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Health Services Research, Quality Measures and Quality of Care - Innovations in Health Care Delivery

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:

American College of Rheumatology (ACR) guidelines recommends the administration of killed vaccines [pneumococcal, influenza and hepatitis B (HepB)], recombinant human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine and live attenuated herpes zoster (HZV) vaccinations prior to therapy with DMARDs or biologic agents. HepB vaccination is indicated if hepatitis risk factors are present. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients already on a DMARD or a biologic agent, vaccination with pneumococcal, influenza, HepB and HPV vaccine should be administered as indicated. RA patients already on a DMARD (non biologics) may be vaccinated with HZV vaccine.

Objective:

The question addressed in this quality improvement project was to ascertain whether veterans with RA at our VA Medical Center (VAMC), are being vaccinated as per ACR guidelines.

Methods:

A retrospective chart review was performed. Patients were identified using clinic encounters with an associated ICD9 code for RA (714.0, 714.2) in the Computerized Patient Record System (CPRS) at our VAMC, from January 1, 2011 through April 23, 2013. Charts were searched using several keywords, for documentation of these vaccinations, either offered or received.

Results:

A total of 330 RA patients were identified, of which 251 were included. Out of the 79 patients excluded, 59 did not have a definitive diagnosis of RA and 20 had insufficient records. The mean age was 74 years, 92% males and 88% Caucasian. Among the included patients 54.5% had been treated with methotrexate, 35.8%  hydroxychloroquine, 65% corticosteroids, 15% sulfazalazine, 6.7% leflunamide, 1.6% azathioprine and 38.6% with a biologic agent. Out of the patients who had been on a DMARD or biologic agent, 95.6% were either offered or received influenza vaccine, 93% pneumococcal vaccine, and 20.5% HZV vaccine. In addition, 1.5% had received Hep B vaccine. HPV vaccine was not indicated as per the vaccination guidelines due to age limitations. In a subset analysis, 53.4% of the patients either received or were offered influenza vaccine in each of the last three years (2010, 2011, 2012), 24% patients in two of the last three years, 17.5% patients only once and the remaining 5.1% were not offered the vaccine.

Conclusion:

At our center, documented pneumococcal vaccination rates were high but annual influenza and HZV vaccination rates were suboptimal.   

The low HZV vaccination rate could be due to some patients already on biologic agents prior to the vaccine approval in 2006 and initial difficulties in obtaining the vaccine. Annual influenza vaccination rates were less than desired. This could be due to missed annual follow ups, unavailable documentation of vaccination administered outside the VAMC & patients who had expired. HepB vaccination rate was also low; however, analysis regarding the presence of hepatitis risk factors was not performed.

Limitations of our analysis were unavailability of vaccination data prior to 1999 before CPRS was implemented and difficulty in obtaining data from outside the VA.

Better adherence to vaccination guidelines and documentation is required. This may be achieved through interventions such as physician and nursing staff education, and use of clinical reminders in CPRS.


Disclosure:

P. Bajaj,
None;

M. Collins,
None;

R. Roy,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/determining-the-vaccination-rates-of-american-college-of-rheumatology-recommended-vaccines-among-veterans-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-a-quality-indicator/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology