ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1467

Determinants of Cervical Cancer Screening Patterns Among Women with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Sarah Chung1, Kimiko Oshima1, Jenna Thomason1, Michael Singleton1 and Namrata Singh2, 1University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 2University of Washington, Bellevue, WA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: Cancer, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), Women's health

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 8, 2021

Title: Abstracts: Reproductive Issues in Rheumatic Disorders (1464–1467)

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:45PM-5:00PM

Background/Purpose: Women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are vulnerable to cervical dysplasia. This is due to the persistence of human papillomavirus (HPV) related to immunosuppression and also immune dysregulation inherent to the disease. Thus, routine screening for cervical cancer is important for SLE women. The United States Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF), American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), and the American Society of Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology (ASCCP) all provide different recommendations regarding screening intervals. The ASCCP provides the only SLE-specific guidelines, advising more frequent screening in this patient population. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence of up-to-date cervical cancer screening per ASCCP guidelines among SLE women established in our institution’s registry program. In addition to identifying the organizational recommendations providers most frequently utilize, we aimed to identify SLE disease-specific determinants associated with overdue screening.

Methods: Inclusion criteria were women aged 21-65 years enrolled in our institution’s SLE registry program. Data regarding cervical cancer screening status at the time of her last rheumatology clinic visit was obtained by retrospective chart review. Data regarding disease duration, 2019 ACR/EULAR SLE classification criteria, SLEDAI-2k score, SLE damage index (SDI) score, immunosuppressant exposure, and gynecologic history were collected. Descriptive statistics and univariable analyses were performed. Effect sizes were characterized by Cramer’s V statistic for categorical variables and by eta squared for continuous variables.

Results: Our study included 130 women with SLE who met eligibility criteria. The mean age (±SD) was 38 (11.3) years, 46% self-reported her race as white (Table 1). 95% met 2019 ACR/EULAR criteria for SLE; mean SLEDAI-2k score (SD) was 5.5 (5.3). 94% had a primary care provider, but only 32% had established with a gynecologist. There were 12 women for whom screening status could not be determined, resulting in a sample size of N=118 for the univariable analysis of correlates of screening status. 45 women were up-to-date with screening per ASCCP guidelines, 19 women per ACOG guidelines, and 54 women were overdue for screening. Patients without a gynecologist were more likely to be overdue for screening. A higher proportion of women screened per ASCCP guidelines were on immunosuppressive medications compared to women screened per ACOG guidelines and those overdue. SLE disease characteristics were not associated with screening patterns (Table 2).

Conclusion: Only half of the women with SLE in our study cohort had guideline-congruent care for cervical cancer screening. A greater proportion of women screened per ASCCP guidelines were on immunosuppressive medications compared to those screened by ACOG guidelines. This study reveals the variety of practice patterns employed for cervical cancer screening in our SLE population and suggests the need for increased awareness among rheumatologists, primary care providers, and gynecologists regarding the ASCCP SLE-specific screening guideline schedules.

Table 1.jpeg”

Table 2 SHC.jpeg”


Disclosures: S. Chung, None; K. Oshima, None; J. Thomason, None; M. Singleton, None; N. Singh, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Chung S, Oshima K, Thomason J, Singleton M, Singh N. Determinants of Cervical Cancer Screening Patterns Among Women with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/determinants-of-cervical-cancer-screening-patterns-among-women-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/determinants-of-cervical-cancer-screening-patterns-among-women-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology