ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1442

Denosumab versus Oral Bisphosphonate for Osteoporosis in Long-term Glucocorticoid Users: A 12-month Randomized Controlled Trial

Chi Chiu Mok1, Ling Yin Ho1 and Kwok Man Ma1, 1Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong, China (People's Republic)

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: glucocorticoids, osteoporosis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2020

Title: Plenary Session III (1441–1446)

Session Type: Plenary Session

Session Time: 11:30AM-1:00PM

Background/Purpose: To compare the efficacy of denosumab (DEN) and oral alendronate (ALN) on spinal bone mineral density (BMD) in long-term glucocorticoid users.

Methods: Patients receiving long-term prednisolone treatment for medical illnesses were recruited.  Inclusion criteria: (1) adult patients ³18 years of age; (2) prednisolone ³2.5mg/day for ³1 year.  Exclusion criteria: (1) previous use of DEN, teriparatide; (2) plan for pregnancy; (3) metabolic bone disease or unexplained hypocalcemia; (4) renal insufficiency.  Participants were randomized to receive either: (1) DEN (60mg subcutaneously every 6 months); or (2) ALN (70mg/week).  Calcium (Caltrate 3000mg/day) and vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol 1000IU/day) was given.  BMD (femoral neck, total hip, lumbar spine) at month 0, 6 and 12 months were performed.  Markers of bone turnover (serum P1NP and CTX) were also assayed at the same time points.  The primary outcome was the difference of lumbar spine BMD change at month 12 between the two groups.

Results: 139 subjects were recruited (age 50.0±12.7 years): 69 assigned DEN and 70 assigned ALN.  Underlying medical diseases: SLE (81%), RA (9.4%) and myositis (5%).  Prednisolone dose at entry was 5.7±2.1mg/day.  56% of female patients were postmenopausal.  73(53%) of patients were osteoporotic (T score < -2.5) at the hip, femoral neck or lumbar spine.  The mean body mass index (BMI) was 23.1±4.1kg/m2 (11% patients had BMI< 18kg/m2).  82(59%) patients were naive to bisphosphonates.  Pre-existing fragility or vertebral fracture was present in 19 (14%) patients and 18 patients (13%) had a family history of fractures.  Baseline demographic data, osteoporotic risk factors, and BMD at various sites were not significantly different between the two groups at entry.  At month 12, a significant gain in BMD at the lumbar spine (+3.5±2.5%; p< 0.001) and the hip (+0.9±2.8%; p=0.01) was observed in DEN-treated patients, whereas the corresponding change was +2.5±2.9% (p< 0.001) and +1.6±2.7% (p< 0.001) in the ALN group.  The spinal BMD at month 12 was significantly higher in the DEN than ALN group after adjustment for BMD values at baseline, age, sex and other osteoporosis risk factors that included smoking, drinking, cumulative steroid doses in one year, BMI, menopausal status and personal history of fracture (p=0.045).  The differences in hip and femoral neck BMD were not significantly different between the two groups after adjustment for the same confounding factors.  No new symptomatic fractures occurred in any participants at month 12.  Adverse events were similar in frequency between the two treatment arms.  Major infective episodes were uncommon (0.06/patient/year) and similar in the two groups.  Minor upper gastrointestinal symptoms and non-specific dizziness were numerically more common in the ALN but arthralgia, minor infections (eg. upper respiratory tract) and new hypertension was more commonly reported in the DEN group.  Three patients from ALN and 2 patients from DEN group were withdrawn from the study because of non-compliance but none withdrew because of adverse events.

Conclusion: In patients receiving long-term glucocorticoids, DEN is superior to ALN in raising the spinal BMD after 12 months’ treatment.  Both DEN and ALN were well tolerated.


Disclosure: C. Mok, None; L. Ho, None; K. Ma, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Mok C, Ho L, Ma K. Denosumab versus Oral Bisphosphonate for Osteoporosis in Long-term Glucocorticoid Users: A 12-month Randomized Controlled Trial [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/denosumab-versus-oral-bisphosphonate-for-osteoporosis-in-long-term-glucocorticoid-users-a-12-month-randomized-controlled-trial/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/denosumab-versus-oral-bisphosphonate-for-osteoporosis-in-long-term-glucocorticoid-users-a-12-month-randomized-controlled-trial/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology