ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 132

Delivering a One-Stop, Integrated, Patient-Centred Service for Patients with Rheumatic Diseases. the Finnish Approach

Elena Nikiphorou1, Paula Väre1, Kirsi Paalanen1, Jelena Borodina1, Arto Kokko2, Pekka Hannonen1 and Tuulikki Sokka-Isler3, 1Jyvaskyla Central Hospital, Jyvaskyla, Finland, 2Jyvaskyla Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland, 3Rheumatology, Jyvaskyla Central Hospital, Jyvaskyla, Finland

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Clinical practice, patient health, Patient participation, rheumatic disease and rheumatic education

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2015

Title: Health Services Research Poster I: Diagnosis, Management and Treatment Strategies

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Rheumatology is mainly an outpatient specialty. Prompt diagnosis & treatment to prevent long-term disability in an integrated, multi-disciplinary approach to care are crucial.  In reality though, not many clinics provide this level of service.

Methods:

Descriptive report & patient satisfaction survey of a rheumatology clinic model  which was first developed in 1996 to enhance the patient ‘journey’ through rheumatology services.  A patient-satisfaction survey assessed several aspects of care including quality of services, consultations, treatment & patient education.  All patients visiting the rheumatology department over a 3-week period were invited to participate.

Results:

All primary care referrals are screened by a rheumatologist to pre-schedule laboratory/radiology tests for the visit.  Upon arrival to the clinic, patients check-in at an electronic desk, then are guided by a receptionist to complete the electronic Go-TreatIT monitoring system (assesses patient-reported outcomes e.g. pain, fatigue) at private stations within the clinic. Of all the collected data the program then generates commonly used comparable values e.g. HAQ, DAS28 & BASFI.  The patient is reviewed by a doctor in a 30-60 minute consultation depending on whether it is a 1st or follow-up visit, then by a nurse (for diagnosis/treatment education, vaccinations, assessment of psychological status etc). An ultrasound machine & capillaroscopy are available for use in clinic.  Patients can be scheduled  on the same day to see a nutritionist, physiotherapist, podiatrist or other professionals as needed.  An ‘early-RA treatment path’ is available to ensure early, intensive treatment (with combination triple DMARD therapy, intra articular & oral steroids). Steps in the process will be diagrammatically shown.

Survey: From 141 recipients, 86% completed a questionnaire;67% female;12% were on their first visit. Mean age:54.3 yrs; 37% retired. 51% had a diagnosis of RA; the remaining included ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, fibromyalgia, lupus, vasculitis. Most valued was the information & education provided by doctors/nurses & addressing patients’ current issues.  93 % of patient ‘agreed’ that their medical care was high quality, 77 % ‘strongly agreed’. The mean score overall assessment of the service was 90.6/100. Only 6% gave negative feedback. The main complaint was difficulty with using the electronic check-in tool (not GoTreatIT). Some patients expressed disappointment for not finding the cause for their symptoms. None of the patients felt they lacked education on their disease or medication. 92% strongly agreed they were given sufficient education.  6% of patients felt that they were overwhelmed with information, 82% were content with the amount of information given. The multi-disciplinary approach was valued & only 3% would rather see doctor and nurse on separate days.

Conclusion:

The specific clinic model provides an ideal setting for a one-stop service, avoiding unnecessary visits, collecting important patient data & enhancing the patient experience & journey through the system.


Disclosure: E. Nikiphorou, None; P. Väre, None; K. Paalanen, None; J. Borodina, None; A. Kokko, None; P. Hannonen, None; T. Sokka-Isler, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Nikiphorou E, Väre P, Paalanen K, Borodina J, Kokko A, Hannonen P, Sokka-Isler T. Delivering a One-Stop, Integrated, Patient-Centred Service for Patients with Rheumatic Diseases. the Finnish Approach [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/delivering-a-one-stop-integrated-patient-centred-service-for-patients-with-rheumatic-diseases-the-finnish-approach/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/delivering-a-one-stop-integrated-patient-centred-service-for-patients-with-rheumatic-diseases-the-finnish-approach/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology