ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1722

Defining Safe Hydroxychloroquine Blood Levels: Time to Switch to Precision Monitoring for Optimized Lupus Care

Shivani Garg1, Benoit Blanchet2, Yann Nguyen3, Fauzia Hollnagel4, Ada Clarke5, Michelle Petri6, Murray Urowitz7, John Hanly8, Caroline Gordon9, Sang-Cheol Bae10, Juanita Romero-Diaz11, Jorge Sanchez-Guerrero12, Ann Clarke13, Sasha Bernatsky14, Daniel Wallace15, David A. Isenberg16, Anisur Rahman16, Joan Merrill17, Paul Fortin18, Dafna D. Gladman19, Ian Bruce20, Ellen Ginzler21, Mary Anne Dooley22, Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman23, Susan Manzi24, Andreas Jönsen25, Graciela Alarcón26, Ronald van Vollenhoven27, Cynthia Aranow28, Murat Inanc29, Meghan mackay30, Guillermo Ruiz-Irastorza31, S. Sam Lim32, Murat Inac33, Kenneth Kalunian34, Søren Jacobsen35, Christine Peschken11, Diane Kamen36, Anca Askanase37, Jill Buyon38, Julie Chezel5, Alicja Puszkiel39 and Nathalie Costedoat-Chalumeau40, 1University of Madison, School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, 2National Referral Centre for Rare Autoimmune and Systemic Diseases, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France, 3Department of Internal Medicine, Beaujon Hospital, AP-HP Nord, Université Paris Cité, Clichy, France, Clichy, France, 4University of Wisconsin, School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Madison, WI, 5Cochin Hospital, Paris, France, 6Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Timonium, MD, 7University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 8Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada, Halifax, NS, Canada, 9Department of Inflammation and Ageing, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom, 10Hanyang University Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea, 11University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada, 12Mount Sinai Hospital and University Health Network, Toronto, Canada, 13Division of Rheumatology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada, 14Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada, 15Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Studio City, CA, 16University College London, London, United Kingdom, 17Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma, 18Centre ARThrite - CHU de Québec - Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada, 19Schroeder Arthritis Institute, Krembil Research Institute, Toronto Western Hospital, Division of Rheumatology, Toronto, ON, Canada, 20Centre for Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom, 21SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, New York, NY, 22UNC physician network, Chapel Hill, NC, 23Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, 24Lupus Center of Excellence, Autoimmunity Institute, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, 25Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden, 26The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Oakland, CA, 27Department of Rheumatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 28Institute of Molecular Medicine, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, 29Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey, 30Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, 31Biobizkaia Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain, 32Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, 33Istanbul University, Istanbul, 34UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 35Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark, 36Medical University of South Carolina, Johns Island, SC, 37Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, 38NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, 39Cochin Hospital, Paris, 40Inserm DR Paris 5, Paris, France

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Eye Disorders, population studies, Renal, risk factors, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 28, 2025

Title: Plenary III (1722–1727)

Session Type: Plenary Session

Session Time: 8:00AM-8:15AM

Background/Purpose: Current guidelines recommend using hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) dose ≤5.0 mg/kg for managing SLE. However, 6-fold higher SLE flares, including those requiring hospitalizations, are noted with HCQ dose of ≤5mg/kg vs. >5mg/kg (Jorge, 2022). Moreover, clear guidance on adjusting HCQ dose in chronic kidney disease (CKD) is lacking. HCQ blood level monitoring could better guide precise HCQ dosing based on patient risk factors. Leveraging data from diverse SLE cohorts, we aimed to study the upper threshold to define a therapeutic range for HCQ blood levels to support clinical use and inform dose adjustments.

Methods: Data were pooled from the SLICC Inception Cohort (n=660, 33 centers in 11 countries in North America, Europe, Asia), one longitudinal prevalent SLE registry (n=269, Wisconsin, USA), and three previously published studies of HCQ levels in SLE (n=1081, centralized in Paris, France). HCQ levels (T0) at first visit for the registry/cohort were measured in whole blood or serum; HCQ serum levels were converted to HCQ whole blood equivalent using the validated conversion factor of dividing by 0.53. The primary outcome was HCQ-related systemic toxicity (cardiac, retinal, muscle) at the last follow-up (T last visit), identified from clinical reports. SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI-2K) at T0 was abstracted to identify active SLE defined as SLEDAI-2K ≥6 (Secondary outcome). Using mixed regression analysis, we first identified a HCQ blood level (T0) predictive of higher HCQ toxicity (T last visit). Next, we tested if this upper threshold was supratherapeutic (no further risk reduction for active SLE). Finally, we examined associations between CKD stage ≥3 and supratherapeutic/toxic HCQ blood levels at T0.

Results: Among 1842 patients, 4.4% had toxicity (85% retinopathy, 9% cardiomyopathy, 6% myopathy). Odds of toxicity were 1.9-fold higher with blood levels >1150 ng/mL (Fig. 1A, Table 1A), and 1.04-fold higher with cumulative HCQ dose per 100g increase (Table 1A). Using 750-1150 ng/ml as a reference range, levels < 750 ng/mL were associated with 1.4 fold higher odds of active SLE (Table 1B), while levels >1150 ng/mL were associated with a saturation in therapeutic effect, indicating supratherapeutic levels (Fig. 1B, Table 1B). Patients on HCQ dose < 5mg/kg had 1.9-fold higher odds of active SLE (Table 1B); 52% of patients on ≤5mg/kg dose had subtherapeutic levels (< 750 ng/ml), and 18% supratherapeutic levels ( >1150 ng/mL).Patients with CKD stage ≥3 had 2.3-fold higher odds of having supratherapeutic/toxic levels ( >1150 ng/mL) (Table 2A). These associations remained significant even in patients on HCQ dose ≤5mg/kg (OR=1.94; Table 2B).

Conclusion: HCQ whole blood levels >1150 ng/mL predicted 2-fold higher risk of HCQ-related toxicity (confirming findings in Petri et al 2020), while levels < 750 ng/mL were associated with 1.4-fold higher active SLE risk. Even with HCQ dose ≤5mg/kg, 52% had subtherapeutic vs. 18% had supratherapeutic levels risking active SLE vs. toxicity, while those with CKD stage ≥3 had supratherapeutic/toxic levels ( >1150 ng/mL). These findings establish the clinical significance of HCQ blood level monitoring to guide precise and optimal HCQ use to balance safety and efficacy in SLE.

Supporting image 1Fig. 1. Adjusted restricted cubic splines to show associations between: HCQ blood levels and toxicity (panel A), and HCQ blood levels and active lupus (SLEDAI ≥6) (panel B) using data from 1842 patients

Supporting image 2Table 1A. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showing factors (T0) associated with HCQ toxicity (T last visit) of HCQ using data from different populations (n=1842); Table 1B. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showing factors (T0) associated with clinical response (active SLE defined as SLEDAI ≥6) at T0 with HCQ use using data from different populations (n=1842)

Supporting image 3Table 2A. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showing factors (T0) associated with supratherapeutic (or toxic) whole blood levels, >1150 ng/mL, at T0 across all patients (n=1842); Table 2B. Multivariable subgroup analysis showing factors (T0) associated with supratherapeutic (or toxic) whole blood levels, >1150 ng/mL, at T0 including only patients on dose ≤5mg/kg (n=781)


Disclosures: S. Garg: None; B. Blanchet: None; Y. Nguyen: None; F. Hollnagel: None; A. Clarke: None; M. Petri: Amgen, 2, AnaptysBio, 2, Annexon Bio, 2, AstraZeneca, 2, 5, Atara Biosciences, 2, Aurinia, 2, 5, Autolus, 2, Bain Capital, 2, Baobab Therapeutics, 2, Biocryst, 2, Biogen, 2, Boxer Capital, 2, Cabaletto Bio, 2, Caribou Biosciences, 2, CTI Clinical Trial and Consulting Services, 2, CVS Health, 2, Dualitybio, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, EMD Serono, 2, Emergent, 2, Escient Pharmaceuticals, 2, Exagen, 5, Exo Therapeutics, 2, Gentibio, 2, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, 5, iCell Gene Therapeutics, 2, Innovaderm Research, 2, IQVIA, 2, Janssen, 5, Kezar Life Sciences, 2, Kira Pharmaceuticals, 2, Nexstone Immunology, 2, Nimbus Lakshmi, 2, Novartis, 2, Ono Pharma, 2, PPD Development, 2, Proviant, 2, Regeneron, 2, Seismic Therapeutic, 2, Senti Biosciences, 2, Sinomab Biosciences, 2, Steritas, 2, Takeda, 2, Tenet Medicines, 2, TG Therapeutics, 2, UCB, 2, Variant Bio, 2, Worldwide Clinical Trials, 2, Zydus, 2; M. Urowitz: AstraZeneca, 6, GSK, 2, Merck/MSD, 2; J. Hanly: None; C. Gordon: Alumis, 2, Amgen, 2, AstraZeneca, 2, Sanofi, 2, UCB, 2; S. Bae: None; J. Romero-Diaz: None; J. Sanchez-Guerrero: None; A. Clarke: AstraZeneca, 2, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, 5, Novartis, 2, Roche, 2; S. Bernatsky: None; D. Wallace: PPD, 2; D. A. Isenberg: None; A. Rahman: None; J. Merrill: None; P. Fortin: AbbVie/Abbott, 1, AstraZeneca, 1, Moderna, 1, Roche, 1; D. Gladman: AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, AstraZeneca, 2, BMS, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, Janssen, 5, Johnson & Johnson, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, Roche, 2, UCB, 2, 5; I. Bruce: AstraZeneca, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, Janssen, 5, Merck/MSD, 2, Novartis, 5, Otsuka, 5, UCB, 2; E. Ginzler: None; M. Dooley: None; R. Ramsey-Goldman: Ampel Solutions, 2, AstraZeneca, 6, Biogen, 2, Cabaletta, 2, Duke, 2, Exagen Diagnostics, 2, Merck, 2, SUNY Syracuse, 2; S. Manzi: AstraZeneca, 2, CAQH, 1, Cartesian, 1, 2, Exagen Diagnostics, Inc, 2, 9, 10, GSK, 2, Lily, 2, Lupus Foundation of America, 4, UCB Advisory Board, 2; A. Jönsen: None; G. Alarcón: None; R. van Vollenhoven: AbbVie, 2, 6, Alfasigma, 5, AstraZeneca, 2, 5, 6, Biogen, 2, 6, BMS, 2, 5, 6, Galapagos, 2, 5, 6, GSK, 2, 6, Janssen, 2, 6, MSD, 5, Novartis, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, RemeGen, 2, 6, Roche, 5, Sanofi, 5, UCB, 2, 5, 6; C. Aranow: Alumis Inc., 2, Ampel Solutions, 2, AstraZeneca, 2, BMS, 2, GSK, 2, Kezar Life Sciences Inc., 2, Merck Sharp & Dohme, 2; M. Inanc: None; M. mackay: None; G. Ruiz-Irastorza: None; S. Lim: Accordant, 2, AstraZeneca, 2, Biogen, 5, BMS, 5, Genentech, 2, Gilead, 5, GSK, 2, Novartis, 5, UCB, 5; M. Inac: None; K. Kalunian: AstraZeneca, 2, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 1, Eli Lilly, 1, Genentech, 1, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 1, Merck/MSD, 1, Novartis, 1, Pfizer, 1, Roche, 1; S. Jacobsen: None; C. Peschken: None; D. Kamen: None; A. Askanase: AbbVie, 2, Amgen, 2, 5, AstraZeneca, 2, 5, Aurinia, 2, 5, BMS, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 5, Genentech, 2, 5, GSK, 2, 5, Idorsia, 2, 5, Janssen, 2, NKARTA, 5, Pfizer, 2, Sanofi, 5, UCB, 2, 5; J. Buyon: Artiva Biotherapeutics, 2, Biogen, 2, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, Celgene, 2, CLIMB Bio Operating, 2, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, Janssen, 2, Related Sciences, 2, UCB, 2; J. Chezel: None; A. Puszkiel: None; N. Costedoat-Chalumeau: Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 6, Roche, 5, UCB Pharma France, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Garg S, Blanchet B, Nguyen Y, Hollnagel F, Clarke A, Petri M, Urowitz M, Hanly J, Gordon C, Bae S, Romero-Diaz J, Sanchez-Guerrero J, Clarke A, Bernatsky S, Wallace D, A. Isenberg D, Rahman A, Merrill J, Fortin P, Gladman D, Bruce I, Ginzler E, Dooley M, Ramsey-Goldman R, Manzi S, Jönsen A, Alarcón G, van Vollenhoven R, Aranow C, Inanc M, mackay M, Ruiz-Irastorza G, Lim S, Inac M, Kalunian K, Jacobsen S, Peschken C, Kamen D, Askanase A, Buyon J, Chezel J, Puszkiel A, Costedoat-Chalumeau N. Defining Safe Hydroxychloroquine Blood Levels: Time to Switch to Precision Monitoring for Optimized Lupus Care [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/defining-safe-hydroxychloroquine-blood-levels-time-to-switch-to-precision-monitoring-for-optimized-lupus-care/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/defining-safe-hydroxychloroquine-blood-levels-time-to-switch-to-precision-monitoring-for-optimized-lupus-care/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology