ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1159

Deep Learning Social Media Analysis Demonstrated Gender-Specific Disparity in Side Effects from Rheumatoid Medications

Ahmad P. Tafti1, Cynthia Crowson 2, Kelly O'Neill 3, Elena Myasoedova 1, Hongfang Liu 4, Pamela Sinicrope 1 and John Davis 1, 1Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 2Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, 3Rheumatoid Patient Foundation, Inc., Winter Springs, FL, 4Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: data analysis and big data

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 11, 2019

Title: Healthcare Disparities In Rheumatology Poster

Session Type: Poster Session (Monday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Multiple studies revealed adverse side effects caused by different rheumatoid arthritis (RA) medications. However, little is known about gender differences in RA treatment and medications. Increasingly patients are sharing and searching for RA information on health-related social media. This study developed deep learning (DL) text analytical tools on top of health-related social media to identify gender-specific disparities in side effects reported by people taking 2 common medications for RA: Methotrexate/Trexall and Leflunomide/Arava.

Methods: Data from three well-known health-related social media, WebMD (https://www.webmd.com/drugs), DailyStrength (https://www.dailystrength.org) and and Drugs.com (https://www.drugs.com), were extracted from June 2013 to May 2019, including gender information and the text of posts. Since Drugs.com does not provide gender of the users, a top 3 name-to-gender inference service, namely NameAPI (https://www.nameapi.org) has been used to identify gender of the users based on their names. We segmented each post into a set of sentences as the units for DL, which used word2vec feature representation. An ensemble of deep neural networks was developed to identify sentences relating to drug adverse side effects. The training data consisted of a random subset of sentences annotated by three domain experts, where each sentence was classified as either describing a side effect (SE) or no side effect (No-SE). A total of 12,702 sentences (6,453 SE and 6,249 No-SE) were annotated, with high inter-annotator agreement of kappa=0.81. A baseline classifier for comparison was trained using Naïve Bayes with bag-of-word features.

Results:

On 4-fold cross-validation, the DL classifier achieved an AUC of 0.897. The accuracy of the ensemble DL classifier outperformed the Naïve Bayes classifier significantly (p=0.04). With the best-tuned configuration, the DL classifier was then applied on 39,191 unseen new sentences for large-scale trend analysis, in which the overall disparity and disparity in five common SEs are shown in Figure 1. To focus on only RA-related sentences, we constrained messages to those that explicitly included at least one of: “RA”, “R.A”, “R.A.”, “bone”, and “joint”. Figure 1 shows the visualization results. 

Conclusion: The study demonstrated feasibility of developing highly accurate DL classifiers for identifying RA medication side effects in social media, providing gender disparity information using this wealth of data. Although social media may reflect biased prevalence of conditions due to subjective user behaviors, we were able to faithfully describe the data. In addition to improving our methods, future work will emphasize verifying/comparing such disparity by applying similar analysis on EHRs along with generic social media (e.g.,  Twitter, Google+, and reddit). The present work elucidates construction of a holistic patient-centered decision support framework that can be merged with a diverse range of clinical data, such as EHRs and clinical notes to help clinicians and patients assess benefits and risks of RA treatments, conducting the development of personalized medicine within the RA context.

Figure 1. -A- Female and male’s percentage who shared side effects experiences associated with Methotrexate -Methotrexate and Trexall- and Leflunomide -Leflunomide and Arava-. One can see the number of adverse side effects posts generated by women was greater than those generated by men. Among 1,389 Methotrexate and Trexall associated posts shared by women -including side effects, indication, and/or other topics-, over 307 posts were discussing side effects associated with this medication. For Leflunomide and Arava, this was 285 out of 1,105 messages posted by women. For men, it was 102 out of 1,119 posts and 137 out of 841 posts, respectively. -B and C- Gender-specific comparative visualizations across different side effects of Methotrexate-Trexall -B- as well as Leflunomide-Arava -C-.


Disclosure: A. P. Tafti, None; C. Crowson, Crescendo Bioscience, 5, Crescendo BioScience Inc., 5, Crescendo Bioscience Inc., 5, Crescendo Biosciences inc., 5, Pfizer, 2; K. O'Neill, None; E. Myasoedova, Pfizer, 2; H. Liu, None; P. Sinicrope, None; J. Davis, Abbvie, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, Sanofi Genzyme, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

P. Tafti A, Crowson C, O'Neill K, Myasoedova E, Liu H, Sinicrope P, Davis J. Deep Learning Social Media Analysis Demonstrated Gender-Specific Disparity in Side Effects from Rheumatoid Medications [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/deep-learning-social-media-analysis-demonstrated-gender-specific-disparity-in-side-effects-from-rheumatoid-medications/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/deep-learning-social-media-analysis-demonstrated-gender-specific-disparity-in-side-effects-from-rheumatoid-medications/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology