ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2747

Dapsa-28 May be Used Instead of Dapsa-66/68 in Psoriatic Arthritis

Umut Kalyoncu, Ozun Bayndır, Mustafa Ferhat Oksuz, Gezmis Kimyon, Abdulsamet Erden, Sule Yavuz, Gozde Cetin, Orhan Kucuksahin, Levent Kilic, Ahmet Omma, Cem Ozisler, Dilek Solmaz, Ahmet Mesut Onat, Bunyamin Kisacik, Duygu Ersozlu Bakirli, Muhammet Cinar, Abdurrahman Tufan, Fatih Yildiz, Ridvan Mercan, Timucin Kasifoglu, Baris Yilmazer, Sema Yilmaz, Kenan Aksu, Sukran Erten, Mehmet Sayarlioglu, Ediz Dalkilic, Servet Akar, Cengizhan Acikel, Muge Aydin Tufan, Ayse Balkarli, Esen Kasapoglu-Gunal, Soner Senel, Senol Kobak, M Tuncay Duruoz, Atalay Dogru, E.Figen Tarhan, Meryem Can, Lutfi Akyol, Seval Pehlevan, Funda Erbasan, Fatos Arslan, Adem Kucuk, Emel Gonullu, Yasemin Kabasakal, Mehmet Sahin, Nilgun Atakan and Sibel Z. Aydin, PsART study group, Ankara, Turkey

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2016

Title: Spondylarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis – Clinical Aspects and Treatment - Poster III

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

 

Background/Purpose: Disease Activity index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) originally developed from patients with reactive arthritis and validated in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients. DAPSA includes swollen joint count (SJC) (66 joint), tender joint count (TJC) (68 joint), CRP (mg/dl), patient global assessment and pain. Although, assessment of 66/68 joints give more information, 28 joint assessment is more feasible, and frequently used in rheumatoid arthritis trials. Objective of this study was to assess correlation of DAPSA 28 joints with DAPSA 66/68 joints in a multicenter PsA registry.

Methods: PsART (Psoriatic Arthritis Registry of Turkey) is a national, web-based registry, including 1081 PsA patients. Overall, 601 patients had complete information about DAPSA score. All affected joints were recorded separately. Original DAPSA calculated to sum of CRP (mg/dl), pain VAS (cm), patient’s global assessment of disease activity VAS (cm), SJC (66 joints), and TJC (68 joints). We calculated both 28 TJC/SJC (called DAPSA-28) and 66/68 joints for DAPSA. Spearman correlation was used for statistical analysis.  

Results: 396 of 601 (65.9%) were female, mean age was 46.5 (12.6) years, mean PsA duration was 5.4 (6.6) years. Mean DAPSA 66/68 score was 14.5 (13.3) and DAPSA 28 score was 12.9 (9.7). Correlation of DAPSA 66/68 and DAPSA 28 was 0.97. Correlation of SJC 28 and SJC 66 was 0.83 and correlation of TJC 28 and TJC 68 was 0.88. Correlation of TJC 28 and 68 were shown in figure 1. 374 of 601 (62.2%) patients at least one active joint according to 66/68 joint assessment. When we consider those group, correlation coefficients were slightly unfavorable in TJC and SJC (SJC 28 vs 66 r=0.78, TJC 28 vs TJC 68 r=0.78), however almost identical in their DAPSA scores (DAPSA 28 vs DAPSA 66/68 r=0.94). Patients with swollen MTF, ankle and DIF joints were 41 (6.8%), 67 (11.1%), and 60 (10.0%), respectively. By doing a 28 joint count, 47 (7.8%) were missed compared to 66/68 joint count due to the DIP, MTF and ankles being the only site of arthritis.

Conclusion: DAPSA domains are almost universal for all kind of inflammatory arthritis. Simple sum of those domains seem valid and feasible in PsA patients. Although assessment of 66/68 joints is rationalized particularly for patients with distal interphalangeal and foot arthritis, our study showed that there was no added value of using 66/68 joints in the real life setting. On the other hand, almost 8% of patients did not capture when assess only 28 joints.                  


Disclosure: U. Kalyoncu, None; O. Bayndır, None; M. F. Oksuz, None; G. Kimyon, None; A. Erden, None; S. Yavuz, None; G. Cetin, None; O. Kucuksahin, UCB, 8,Pfizer Inc, 8,Abbvie, 8,MSD, 8,Roche Pharmaceuticals, 8; L. Kilic, None; A. Omma, None; C. Ozisler, None; D. Solmaz, None; A. M. Onat, BMS, 8,MSD, 8,Pfizer Inc, 8,UCB, 8,Roche Pharmaceuticals, 8; B. Kisacik, None; D. Ersozlu Bakirli, None; M. Cinar, None; A. Tufan, None; F. Yildiz, None; R. Mercan, None; T. Kasifoglu, Abbvie, 8,BMS, 8,Roche Pharmaceuticals, 8,MSD, 8,Actelion Pharmaceuticals US, 8; B. Yilmazer, None; S. Yilmaz, None; K. Aksu, None; S. Erten, Pfizer Inc, 8,Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation, 8; M. Sayarlioglu, Pfizer Inc, 8,Abbvie, 8,MSD, 8,BMS, 8,UCB, 8,Celtrion, 8; E. Dalkilic, Abbvie, 8,MSD, 8,Roche Pharmaceuticals, 8,UCB, 8,Pfizer Inc, 8; S. Akar, None; C. Acikel, None; M. Aydin Tufan, None; A. Balkarli, None; E. Kasapoglu-Gunal, None; S. Senel, None; S. Kobak, None; M. T. Duruoz, None; A. Dogru, None; E. F. Tarhan, None; M. Can, None; L. Akyol, None; S. Pehlevan, None; F. Erbasan, None; F. Arslan, None; A. Kucuk, None; E. Gonullu, None; Y. Kabasakal, None; M. Sahin, None; N. Atakan, None; S. Z. Aydin, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Kalyoncu U, Bayndır O, Oksuz MF, Kimyon G, Erden A, Yavuz S, Cetin G, Kucuksahin O, Kilic L, Omma A, Ozisler C, Solmaz D, Onat AM, Kisacik B, Ersozlu Bakirli D, Cinar M, Tufan A, Yildiz F, Mercan R, Kasifoglu T, Yilmazer B, Yilmaz S, Aksu K, Erten S, Sayarlioglu M, Dalkilic E, Akar S, Acikel C, Aydin Tufan M, Balkarli A, Kasapoglu-Gunal E, Senel S, Kobak S, Duruoz MT, Dogru A, Tarhan EF, Can M, Akyol L, Pehlevan S, Erbasan F, Arslan F, Kucuk A, Gonullu E, Kabasakal Y, Sahin M, Atakan N, Aydin SZ. Dapsa-28 May be Used Instead of Dapsa-66/68 in Psoriatic Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/dapsa-28-may-be-used-instead-of-dapsa-6668-in-psoriatic-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/dapsa-28-may-be-used-instead-of-dapsa-6668-in-psoriatic-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology