ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2332

Dapirolizumab Pegol Efficacy by Subgroups in Patients with SLE: A Post Hoc Analysis of Phase 2b Clinical Trial Data

Anca Askanase1, Christian Stach2, Claire Brittain3, George Stojan4 and Richard Furie5, 1Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, 2UCB Pharma, Monheim am Rheim, Germany, 3UCB Pharma, Slough, United Kingdom, 4UCB, Baltimore, MD, 5Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: clinical trial, Disease Activity, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 14, 2023

Title: (2326–2351) SLE – Treatment Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) clinical trials are challenged by high standard of care plus placebo (SOC+PBO) response rates.1 Previous post hoc analyses of the phase 2b RISE trial in SLE (NCT02804763) identified acute flare and normal complement as potential predictors of SOC+PBO response.2 This analysis aims to evaluate the treatment effect of dapirolizumab pegol (DZP; a polyethylene glycol-conjugated antigen-binding fragment lacking a functional Fc domain that inhibits CD40L) in subgroups of patients (pts) from the phase 2b RISE trial based on the previously identified potential predictors of SOC+PBO response.2,3

Methods: Post hoc analyses were performed on data from the phase 2b RISE trial, in which pts received PBO or DZP (6/24/45 mg/kg), alongside SOC, for 24 weeks (wks).3 Adults with moderately to severely active SLE, receiving stable doses of corticosteroids, antimalarial or immunosuppressant drugs were included in the trial.3 Pts from the trial were divided into subgroups based on previously identified potential predictors of SOC+PBO response.2 Disease course at screening was defined using British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) 2004 item level scores as acute flare (worsening/new symptoms) or persistent (symptoms rated as the same) based on the past 4 wks compared with the 4 wks prior to those. Low C3/C4 was defined as below the lower limit of normal at screening. Outcomes to Wk 24 were evaluated in subgroups and compared with the overall population. Outcomes assessed were BILAG-based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) response, SLE Responder Index-4 (SRI-4) response, and change from baseline in Physician’s Global Assessment (PGA).

Results: A higher proportion of pts receiving SOC+PBO with acute flare (vs persistent disease activity) and with normal C3/C4 (vs low C3/C4) achieved BICLA response at Wk 24 (Figures 1a&1b). When the subgroups were combined, a significantly higher proportion of pts receiving SOC+PBO with acute flare and normal C3/C4 achieved BICLA response at Wk 24 compared with pts receiving SOC+PBO with either acute flare with low C3/C4 or persistent disease activity (Figure 1c). BICLA responses to Wk 24 in the combined subgroups for pts receiving SOC+PBO and SOC+DZP are presented in Figure 2b&2c, alongside BICLA response in the overall population from the RISE trial in Figure 2a. Similar patterns were seen for SRI-4 response and change from baseline in PGA in the combined subgroups (data not shown). Baseline characteristics in the combined subgroups are presented in Table 1.

Conclusion: Albeit in a limited sample size, pts with acute flare and normal complement were more likely to achieve response to SOC+PBO than pts with acute flare and low complement or persistent disease activity. These data suggest that SLE trial design may need to consider baseline clinical and serologic activity patterns to adequately assess treatment efficacy. References:1. Durcan L. Lancet. 2023;S0140-6736(23)00342-2. 2. Stach C. Presented at LUPUS & KCR 2023, Abstract 2023-0801, ePoster LP-198. 3. Furie RA. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021;60:5397–407.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2

Supporting image 3


Disclosures: A. Askanase: AbbVie, 2, Amgen, 2, AstraZeneca, 2, Aurinia, 2, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, Celgene, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, Genentech, 2, GSK, 2, Idorsia, 2, Janssen, 2, Mallinckrodt, 2, Pfizer, 2, UCB Pharma, 2; C. Stach: UCB Pharma, 3, 11; C. Brittain: UCB Pharma, 3, 11; G. Stojan: UCB Pharma, 3, 11; R. Furie: Biogen, 2, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Askanase A, Stach C, Brittain C, Stojan G, Furie R. Dapirolizumab Pegol Efficacy by Subgroups in Patients with SLE: A Post Hoc Analysis of Phase 2b Clinical Trial Data [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/dapirolizumab-pegol-efficacy-by-subgroups-in-patients-with-sle-a-post-hoc-analysis-of-phase-2b-clinical-trial-data/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/dapirolizumab-pegol-efficacy-by-subgroups-in-patients-with-sle-a-post-hoc-analysis-of-phase-2b-clinical-trial-data/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology