ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0027

CYP2D6 Genotype and Reduced Codeine Analgesic Effect in Real-World Clinical Practice

Daniel Carranza Leon1, Alyson Dickson2, Andrea Gaedigk3, C. Michael Stein2 and Cecilia Chung2, 1Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, 2Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, 3University of Missouri, Kansas City

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: genomics, pain

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Friday, November 6, 2020

Title: Fibromyalgia & Other Clinical Pain Syndromes Poster

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Codeine, a widely prescribed analgesic, is an inactive pro-drug that is metabolized to morphine, the active drug, by cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6), a highly polymorphic enzyme. However, the impact of CYP2D6 metabolizer status on pain control in patients receiving codeine in real-world clinical practice is still poorly defined. We examined the hypotheses that among patients prescribed codeine (1) CYP2D6 poor and intermediate metabolizers have poorer pain control than normal or ultrarapid metabolizers; and (2) a response score combining clinical data with CYP2D6 phenotype is associated with pain response in real-world clinical practice.

Methods: We studied 157 patients with a baseline pain score higher than 4 (0-10 scale) who received codeine and had complete clinical data using a DNA biobank linked with electronic health records (EHRs). The primary outcome was pain response, defined as pain score of 4 or lower while receiving codeine. Clinical variables were collected from EHRs and a propensity score developed to adjust for potential confounders. Patients were classified as poor (PM), intermediate (IM), normal (NM), or ultrarapid CYP2D6 metabolizers (UM) based on CYP2D6 genotyping. To discriminate between patients who responded and who did not respond to codeine, we built a score that included clinical variables and CYP2D6 phenotype.

Results: There were 69 PM or IMs and 88 NM or UMs. Among the PM and IMs, the response rate was 14% (10 out of 69), compared to 27% among the NM or UM metabolizers (24 out of 88), p=0.08. After propensity score adjustment, the odds ratio of achieving a pain score of 4 or lower was 0.35 (95% CI: 0.14-0.84, p=0.02) among PM or IMs. The response rate was 38.5% (95% CI=25.3-53.0%) among patients in the high, 17.3% (95% CI: 8.2-30.3%) in the intermediate, and 9.4% (95% CI: 3.1-20.7%) in the low response score groups, respectively (p=0.001) (Figure).

Conclusion: The analgesic effect of codeine was lower among PM and IMs than in NM and UMs. A score based on CYP2D6 phenotype and clinical variables improved the discrimination between analgesic response and non-response to codeine in real-world clinical practice. 


Disclosure: D. Carranza Leon, None; A. Dickson, None; A. Gaedigk, None; C. Stein, None; C. Chung, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Carranza Leon D, Dickson A, Gaedigk A, Stein C, Chung C. CYP2D6 Genotype and Reduced Codeine Analgesic Effect in Real-World Clinical Practice [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/cyp2d6-genotype-and-reduced-codeine-analgesic-effect-in-real-world-clinical-practice/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/cyp2d6-genotype-and-reduced-codeine-analgesic-effect-in-real-world-clinical-practice/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology