ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1531

CUT-Off LEVEL of Adalimumab and Prevalence of Antibodies ANTI-Adalimumab in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis: Results from a LOCAL Registry

Jose Rosas1, Francisca Llinares-Tello2, José M. Senabre-Gallego3, Carlos Santos-Ramirez4, Esteban Salas-Heredia3, Xavier Barber5, Gregorio Santos-Soler3, Juan Molina2, Mario García-Carrasco6, Ana Pons3, Catalina Cano3 and Group Aire-MB3, 1Rheumatology, Hospital Marina Baixa. Villajoyosa, Villajoyosa, Spain, 2Laboratory, Hospital Marina Baixa, Villajoyosa, Spain, 3Rheumatology, Hospital Marina Baixa, Villajoyosa, Spain, 4Rheumatology, Hospital Marina Salud, Denia, Spain, 5Universidad Miguel Hernández, CIO, Elche, Spain, 6Inmunología y Reumatología, Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Puebla, Mexico

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Adalimumab, ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and laboratory tests

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy: Novel therapies, Biosimilars, Strategies and Mechanisms in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose To evaluate the Cut-off level of adalimumab (ADL) and the prevalence of antibodies anti-adalimumab (anti-ADL-ab), in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

Methods

We included  115 test of serum level of ADL and anti-ADL-Ab from 60 consecutives patients, on treatment with ADL at least 6 months, diagnosed of peripheral arthritis PsA (16 test in 10 patients), or AS (99 test in 50 patients). Clinical characteristics, clinical activity index (DAS28-ESR, SDAI, for peripheral PsA; BASDAI and ASDAS for AS, were recorded.

Serum levels of ADL and anti-ADL-Ab was evaluated by an ELISA kit: Promonitor®-ADL and Promonitor®-anti-ADL-Ab (Progenika Biopharma, S.A., a Grifols Company). Cut-off level for serum level of ADL was >0.004 U/mL and for anti-ADL-Ab was >3.5 U/mL. Serum samples were collected before injection of ADL, and stored frozen -80ºC, until analysis. 

Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was used to obtain a cut-off value for ADL trough levels between RA patients with low disease activity (DAS28 ≤ 3.2) versus those with moderate or high activity (DAS28 > 3.2), and for AS patients, between ASDAS ≤2.1 vs >2.1. 

Results

We enrolled 60 patients, 56% were women, mean age 48±16 years. In 50 (84%) patients with AS, 99 test (86%) for ADL level and anti-ADL-Ab and in 10 patients (16%), diagnosed of PsA, 16 (14%) test was done.

For the whole patients: the average time of treatment was 9.5±9 years and the average time on treatment with ADL 1.7±1.4 years; in 38 (63%), ADL was the first biological drug administered; the mean BMI was 27 and the prevalence of anti-ADL-Ab was 30% (18 patients: 14 -28%- patients with AS and 4 -40%- of patients with PsA).

In patients with anti-ADL-Ab versus patients without ant-ADL-ab, we obtained significantly higher level of ADL (11.5±5.3 vs 0.12 ± 0.2; p<0.0001), less BASDAI response (2.7±1.8 vs 5.5±2.0; p<0.0001), less ASDAS level (1.8±0.6 vs 3.5±2.6; p=0.008) and less time on treatment with ADL (2.2±1.4 vs 0.8±0.4; p<0.0001). Although the 35% patients without anti-ADL-ab was treated with DMARDs and only 10% of patients with anti-ADL-ab, there was not statistical differences (p=0.2). .The cut-off level of ADL in patients with AS to achieve an ASDAS≤2.1 was 5.4 mg/L, with AUC of 82.9% (sensitivity: 91%; specificity: 75%).

Table 1. Characteristics in responders and non-responders patients in relation with ASDAS results.

 

Responders (n:42)

ASDAS ≤ 2.1

Non-Responders (n:42)

ASDAS ≤ 2.1

P

ADL level, mean ± SD

11.0 ±  4.4

1.7 ± 4.1

<0.001

Anti-ADL-ab (%)

2*

71

0.006

BASDAI, mean ± SD

2.5 ± 1.5

5.7 ± 1.8

<0.001

DMARD (%)

40

17

0.4

Time (years) on ADL, mean±SD

1.7±1.2

1.2±1

0,08

(*a patient with a detectable low level of ADL and the anti-ADL-ab was demonstrated using acid dissociation technique).

Conclusion

1.Cut-off level of ADL in patients with AS to achieve an ASDAS≤2.1 was 5.4 mg/L. 2. Prevalence anti-ADL-Ab in AS was 28%. 3. Anti-ADL-ab is correlated significantly with lower level of ADL, BASDAI and ASDAI results and less time on treatment. 4. Patients responders have occasionally anti-ADL-ab, and significantly higher serum concentrations of ADL than non-responders.

This study has a grant from Spanish Society for Rheumatology


Disclosure:

J. Rosas,
None;

F. Llinares-Tello,
None;

J. M. Senabre-Gallego,
None;

C. Santos-Ramirez,
None;

E. Salas-Heredia,
None;

X. Barber,
None;

G. Santos-Soler,
None;

J. Molina,
None;

M. García-Carrasco,
None;

A. Pons,
None;

C. Cano,
None;

G. Aire-MB,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/cut-off-level-of-adalimumab-and-prevalence-of-antibodies-anti-adalimumab-in-patients-with-ankylosing-spondylitis-results-from-a-local-registry/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology