Session Information
Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)
Background/Purpose To evaluate the Cut-off level of adalimumab (ADL) and the prevalence of antibodies anti-adalimumab (anti-ADL-ab), in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS).
Methods
We included 115 test of serum level of ADL and anti-ADL-Ab from 60 consecutives patients, on treatment with ADL at least 6 months, diagnosed of peripheral arthritis PsA (16 test in 10 patients), or AS (99 test in 50 patients). Clinical characteristics, clinical activity index (DAS28-ESR, SDAI, for peripheral PsA; BASDAI and ASDAS for AS, were recorded.
Serum levels of ADL and anti-ADL-Ab was evaluated by an ELISA kit: Promonitor®-ADL and Promonitor®-anti-ADL-Ab (Progenika Biopharma, S.A., a Grifols Company). Cut-off level for serum level of ADL was >0.004 U/mL and for anti-ADL-Ab was >3.5 U/mL. Serum samples were collected before injection of ADL, and stored frozen -80ºC, until analysis.
Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was used to obtain a cut-off value for ADL trough levels between RA patients with low disease activity (DAS28 ≤ 3.2) versus those with moderate or high activity (DAS28 > 3.2), and for AS patients, between ASDAS ≤2.1 vs >2.1.
Results
We enrolled 60 patients, 56% were women, mean age 48±16 years. In 50 (84%) patients with AS, 99 test (86%) for ADL level and anti-ADL-Ab and in 10 patients (16%), diagnosed of PsA, 16 (14%) test was done.
For the whole patients: the average time of treatment was 9.5±9 years and the average time on treatment with ADL 1.7±1.4 years; in 38 (63%), ADL was the first biological drug administered; the mean BMI was 27 and the prevalence of anti-ADL-Ab was 30% (18 patients: 14 -28%- patients with AS and 4 -40%- of patients with PsA).
In patients with anti-ADL-Ab versus patients without ant-ADL-ab, we obtained significantly higher level of ADL (11.5±5.3 vs 0.12 ± 0.2; p<0.0001), less BASDAI response (2.7±1.8 vs 5.5±2.0; p<0.0001), less ASDAS level (1.8±0.6 vs 3.5±2.6; p=0.008) and less time on treatment with ADL (2.2±1.4 vs 0.8±0.4; p<0.0001). Although the 35% patients without anti-ADL-ab was treated with DMARDs and only 10% of patients with anti-ADL-ab, there was not statistical differences (p=0.2). .The cut-off level of ADL in patients with AS to achieve an ASDAS≤2.1 was 5.4 mg/L, with AUC of 82.9% (sensitivity: 91%; specificity: 75%).
Table 1. Characteristics in responders and non-responders patients in relation with ASDAS results.
|
Responders (n:42) ASDAS ≤ 2.1 |
Non-Responders (n:42) ASDAS ≤ 2.1 |
P |
ADL level, mean ± SD |
11.0 ± 4.4 |
1.7 ± 4.1 |
<0.001 |
Anti-ADL-ab (%) |
2* |
71 |
0.006 |
BASDAI, mean ± SD |
2.5 ± 1.5 |
5.7 ± 1.8 |
<0.001 |
DMARD (%) |
40 |
17 |
0.4 |
Time (years) on ADL, mean±SD |
1.7±1.2 |
1.2±1 |
0,08 |
(*a patient with a detectable low level of ADL and the anti-ADL-ab was demonstrated using acid dissociation technique).
Conclusion
1.Cut-off level of ADL in patients with AS to achieve an ASDAS≤2.1 was 5.4 mg/L. 2. Prevalence anti-ADL-Ab in AS was 28%. 3. Anti-ADL-ab is correlated significantly with lower level of ADL, BASDAI and ASDAI results and less time on treatment. 4. Patients responders have occasionally anti-ADL-ab, and significantly higher serum concentrations of ADL than non-responders.
This study has a grant from Spanish Society for Rheumatology
Disclosure:
J. Rosas,
None;
F. Llinares-Tello,
None;
J. M. Senabre-Gallego,
None;
C. Santos-Ramirez,
None;
E. Salas-Heredia,
None;
X. Barber,
None;
G. Santos-Soler,
None;
J. Molina,
None;
M. García-Carrasco,
None;
A. Pons,
None;
C. Cano,
None;
G. Aire-MB,
None.
« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/cut-off-level-of-adalimumab-and-prevalence-of-antibodies-anti-adalimumab-in-patients-with-ankylosing-spondylitis-results-from-a-local-registry/