ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2945

Culturally Enhanced Pain Coping Skills Training for African Americans with Osteoarthritis

Kelli Allen1, Tamara Somers2, Lisa Campbell3, Cynthia Coffman4, Liubov Arbeeva5, Crystal Cene6, Eugene Oddone7 and Francis Keefe2, 1Rheumatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC, 2Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 3East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, 4Health Services Research, Durham VA Medical Center and Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 5TARC, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 6University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 7Duke University Medical Center and Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Coping skills, pain and race/ethnicity

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Wednesday, October 24, 2018

Title: 6W016 ARHP Abstract: Interventions & Self-Management–ARHP III (2940–2945)

Session Type: ARHP Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 9:00AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose:  African Americans (AAs) bear a disproportionate burden of osteoarthritis (OA), with greater pain and disability compared with Non-Hispanic Whites.  Pain coping skills training (PCST) is a promising intervention to reduce racial disparities in OA-related pain and other outcomes, but there has been little study of PCST among AAs.  This project engaged AAs with OA and other stakeholders (caregivers, clinicians) to culturally tailor a PSCT program for AAs, then evaluated the PCST program in a multi-site randomized controlled trial. 

Methods:  248 AAs (51% male, mean age = 29 years) with knee OA were randomized with equal allocation to PCST and wait list (WL) control groups.  The PCST program involved 11 telephone-based sessions over 12 weeks, delivered by a counselor.  Outcomes were assessed at baseline, 12 weeks and 36 weeks and included the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscale (primary outcome), WOMAC total score (pain, stiffness and function), Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ) – Total Coping Attempts, Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), PROMIS Pain Interference Scale, Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8, depressive symptoms), and Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale.  Linear mixed models were fit for all outcomes with unstructured covariance to account for repeated measurements. All models included stratification variables (enrollment site and gender).

Results:  At 12-week follow-up, the PCST group improved (decreased) in WOMAC pain score more than the WL group, but the difference was not statistically significant (Table 1).  At 12-week follow-up there were significant differences, in favor of the PCST group, for CSQ Total Coping Attempts, PCS, and Arthritis Self Efficacy (p<0.01).  At 36 weeks, WOMAC pain scores were significantly improved in the PCST group compared with the WL group (p<0.05, Table 1).  CSQ Total Coping Attempts and Arthritis Self Efficacy scores were also significantly improved at 36 weeks in the PCST group, compared with the WL group (p<0.01).

Conclusion: The culturally tailored PCST program resulted in improved pain severity, particularly at longer-term follow-up, and pain coping among AAs with knee OA.  Other studies also suggest that effects of PCST interventions may be more robust after patients have had more opportunity to practice and incorporate skills.  Dissemination of this PCST program may help to reduce racial disparities in pain.

Table 1.  Mean Differences in Study Outcomes Between PCST and WL Control Groups

 

Outcome

Time Point

WL Control (N=124)

Mean (95% CI)

PCST (N=124)

Mean (95% CI)

Treatment Difference:

PCST-WL

Mean (95% CI)

p-value

 

WOMAC Pain Score

Baseline

11.01 (10.53,11.49)

N/A 

N/A

 

12 weeks

10.05 (9.43,10.68)

9.39 (8.75,10.03)

-0.66 (-1.48,0.16)

0.1122

 

36 weeks

9.6 (8.91,10.3)

8.69 (7.96,9.42)

-0.91 (-1.82,-0.01)

0.0476

 

WOMAC Total Score

Baseline

53.01 (50.8,55.21)

N/A 

N/A

 

12 weeks

49.02 (46.17,51.87)

46.33 (43.43,49.23)

-2.69 (-6.09,0.7)

0.1194

 

36 weeks

47.49 (44.36,50.61)

43.71 (40.48,46.95)

-3.77 (-7.57,0.03)

0.0516

 

CSQ Total Coping Attempts

Baseline

105.28 (100.52,110.04)

N/A

N/A

 

12 weeks

106.43 (101.19,111.68)

121.64 (116.29,126.99)

15.2 (8.99,21.42)

0.001

 

36 weeks

102.87 (97.33,108.42)

114.27 (108.53,120.01)

11.4 (4.82,17.98)

0.0008

 

PCS

Baseline

19.73 (18.18,21.27)

19.73 (18.18,21.27)

12 weeks

20.83 (18.86,22.8)

17.8 (15.8,19.8)

-3.03 (-5.25,-0.8)

0.0078

 

36 weeks

18.35 (16.32,20.37)

16.97 (14.85,19.08)

-1.38 (-3.85,1.09)

0.2728

 

PROMIS Pain Interference

Baseline

63.76 (62.89,64.62)

N/A

N/A

 

12 weeks

61.96 (60.91,63.02)

61.09 (60.01,62.17)

-0.87 (-2.21,0.47)

0.203

 

36 weeks

62.14 (60.93,63.35)

60.91 (59.65,62.17)

-1.23 (-2.69,0.24)

0.1009

 

PHQ-8

Baseline

6.2 (5.54,6.86)

6.2 (5.54,6.86)

N/A

N/A

 

12 weeks

6.38 (5.53,7.24)

5.88 (5,6.76)

-0.5 (-1.57,0.57)

0.356

 

36 weeks

6.33 (5.44,7.21)

5.31 (4.37,6.25)

-1.02 (-2.19,0.15)

0.0866

 

Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale

Baseline

5.87 (5.62,6.11)

N/A

N/A

 

12 weeks

5.66 (5.35,5.98)

6.67 (6.35,6.99)

1.01 (0.61,1.41)

<0.001

 

36 weeks

5.66 (5.33,5.99)

6.33 (5.99,6.67)

0.67 (0.24,1.09)

0.0021

 


Disclosure: K. Allen, None; T. Somers, None; L. Campbell, None; C. Coffman, None; L. Arbeeva, None; C. Cene, None; E. Oddone, None; F. Keefe, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Allen K, Somers T, Campbell L, Coffman C, Arbeeva L, Cene C, Oddone E, Keefe F. Culturally Enhanced Pain Coping Skills Training for African Americans with Osteoarthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/culturally-enhanced-pain-coping-skills-training-for-african-americans-with-osteoarthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/culturally-enhanced-pain-coping-skills-training-for-african-americans-with-osteoarthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology